Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 (Post 935621)

He's started 2 games. Why don't you give him a minute to get acclimated to running the offense. At least we're seeing him have success.

5 TDs. 0 INTs. Over 700 yds passing. 94pt QBR. It's a very good start.

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 935626)

He's looking just like he looked in 2017-18 when he started 25 games in Denver. He's tentative, holds onto the ball, takes a lot of sacks, and completes under 60% of his passes. He's exactly who he's always been.

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 (Post 935628)

Tentative? Could it be the meager receivers he's working with?

Takes a lot of sacks? Should he be pass blocking for himself?

60% completion? Should he also be CATCHING his own passes?

Originally Posted by frydaddy (Post 935625)

Taysom Hill isn't starting NFL QB material, and he's never going to be. The man is in his 30s, too late to rebuild his mechanics and make him a proper passer. I know he managed to win some games last year, but he had a better supporting cast around him than what Siemian currently has to work with. I'd be willing to bet that putting him in as the starter would result in more lopsided losses than anything. Seems Payton has the same idea, or he wouldn't still be rolling with Trevor over Taysom.

Originally Posted by RailBoss (Post 935631)

I'm not sure Taysom would last behind center as a starter. He's already had a concussion and now he has an issue with his foot.
He's a bit of a "One Man Wrecking Crew" and has one speed which is full speed. In my opinion I think SP has this right.

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 935634)

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 935626)

He's looking just like he looked in 2017-18 when he started 25 games in Denver. He's tentative, holds onto the ball, takes a lot of sacks, and completes under 60% of his passes. He's exactly who he's always been.

Originally Posted by Thirty3 (Post 935642)

You sound like me talking about Winston.