Culpepper

saintz08 · 09-19-2005, 11:51 AM

Once and for all

Its " Fumbalaya Brooks " and " Dropsie Culpepper "

TheGambler · 09-19-2005, 11:55 AM

Originally Posted by papz

Culpepper > Brooks anyday.

Just like he was yesterday right? And the Sunday before that.

Anyway......my only problem is the fact that people sweep Daunte's mistake's under the rug while bashing Brooks for very similar errors. I don't really care if people prefer Culpepper over Brooks.........but there's no need to act like the margin of difference is vastly wide.

saintswhodi · 09-19-2005, 11:58 AM

Originally Posted by papz

That ONE playoff win would mean the world to us Saints' fans. We've been waiting way too long for it.

Culpepper > Brooks anyday. It's extremely interesting and weird why anyone would consider Brooks over Culpepper? That's a first for me.

Me too papz. I have decided I just won't entertain this any more. Certain arguments are not even worth it.

papz · 09-19-2005, 12:13 PM

If you knew that the starting left tackle played in one game last year, the guard is a rookie, and Matt Birk is out... then you would know that it's not entirely Culpepper's fault. So basically, he's playing with only 2 regulars on that line.

He might have blew this weekend and the last, but he definately is one of the elite quarterbacks out there and has proven to be year in and year out. He has two playoff appearances, which to me is the only thing that counts even though he's had 2 Probowl appearances to go along with some sick numbers, to AB's one.

You are trying to discredit Culpepper over two bad games. So would you have rather had Culpepper or Brooks on your team last season. How about the year before that? Come on now we all can see you're a pretty hardcore Saints fan and like to defend our players... but you are denying the fact that Brooks has been a part of the problem here.

chRxis · 09-19-2005, 06:05 PM

with randy gone (which was the biggest offseason mistake in the nfl) they have no real downfield threat... combine that with a lack luster running game, shotty at best offensive line, and you have the vikings... they greatly improved the defense on paper, but that hasn't really materialized on the field, where the game is played... tice now sits on the hottest seat in the nfl, thanks to trading away the premier wr in the game...

09-19-2005, 11:51 AM	#31
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	Once and for all Its " Fumbalaya Brooks " and " Dropsie Culpepper "
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020

09-19-2005, 11:55 AM	#32
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by papz Culpepper > Brooks anyday. Just like he was yesterday right? And the Sunday before that. Anyway......my only problem is the fact that people sweep Daunte's mistake's under the rug while bashing Brooks for very similar errors. I don't really care if people prefer Culpepper over Brooks.........but there's no need to act like the margin of difference is vastly wide.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

09-19-2005, 11:58 AM	#33
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by papz That ONE playoff win would mean the world to us Saints' fans. We've been waiting way too long for it. Culpepper > Brooks anyday. It's extremely interesting and weird why anyone would consider Brooks over Culpepper? That's a first for me. Me too papz. I have decided I just won't entertain this any more. Certain arguments are not even worth it.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

09-19-2005, 12:13 PM	#34
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,744	If you knew that the starting left tackle played in one game last year, the guard is a rookie, and Matt Birk is out... then you would know that it's not entirely Culpepper's fault. So basically, he's playing with only 2 regulars on that line. He might have blew this weekend and the last, but he definately is one of the elite quarterbacks out there and has proven to be year in and year out. He has two playoff appearances, which to me is the only thing that counts even though he's had 2 Probowl appearances to go along with some sick numbers, to AB's one. You are trying to discredit Culpepper over two bad games. So would you have rather had Culpepper or Brooks on your team last season. How about the year before that? Come on now we all can see you're a pretty hardcore Saints fan and like to defend our players... but you are denying the fact that Brooks has been a part of the problem here.

09-19-2005, 06:05 PM	#35
chRxis 500th Post Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Baton Rouge, LA Posts: 690	with randy gone (which was the biggest offseason mistake in the nfl) they have no real downfield threat... combine that with a lack luster running game, shotty at best offensive line, and you have the vikings... they greatly improved the defense on paper, but that hasn't really materialized on the field, where the game is played... tice now sits on the hottest seat in the nfl, thanks to trading away the premier wr in the game...