I made ONE comment on this thread and it was in regard to a comment Major made and my interpretation of it and how I thought guido missed his point. In what way was my comment an attack or argumentative?

Look, I’m not trying to stoke the flames here. I interpreted the posts by major and guido totally different than your take. I interpreted your response as being argumentative. If that wasn’t your intent then I apologize. After re-reading the post I can see your point on what major was saying. I simply didn’t see it that way. I thought your questions were argumentative because I didn’t view it as being about Weis or how good or bad he was. I simply saw it as Weis saying that he did things a certain way and that he sees now that was possibly why he struggled as a head coach. He can take that experience and share it with young coaches so they might not adopt the same philosophy. That’s how I read it. I can see the point of who is he to give head coaching advice given his record but if he knows now one of the areas he failed as a HC then I don’t see the problem with him sharing that with others. That’s just my take on it.

How I got dragged into this crap of being labeled as argumentative with guido of all posters is friggin beyond me. It does piss me the hell off though considering things he’s hit me with in the past.

Well thanks for the apology, but for someone not trying to take sides or fan the flames you made a post placing the blame quite firmly on me with:

“ This thread was going fine with a back and forth of thoughts, ideas, and opinions on the topic. Then you had to do exactly what y’all have vilified guido of doing and that’s try to start an argument.”

I clearly said “may be” he missed the point. I never said guido was wrong or attacked him. I was providing that back and forth of thoughts and ideas you claimed was fine when others were doing it; but for some reason it’s not fine with you, guido, fin or rugby when I did it.

Since my point was about Major’s post and he liked my response I feel guido did in fact miss Major’s point and my comment was spot on. How I got dragged into this crap of being labeled as argumentative with guido of all posters is friggin beyond me. It does piss me the hell off though considering things he’s hit me with in the past.

Look, I’m not trying to stoke the flames here. I interpreted the posts by major and guido totally different than your take. I interpreted your response as being argumentative. If that wasn’t your intent then I apologize. After re-reading the post I can see your point on what major was saying. I simply didn’t see it that way. I thought your questions were argumentative because I didn’t view it as being about Weis or how good or bad he was. I simply saw it as Weis saying that he did things a certain way and that he sees now that was possibly why he struggled as a head coach. He can take that experience and share it with young coaches so they might not adopt the same philosophy. That’s how I read it. I can see the point of who is he to give head coaching advice given his record but if he knows now one of the areas he failed as a HC then I don’t see the problem with him sharing that with others. That’s just my take on it.