New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006 (https://blackandgold.com/saints/101951-jameis-winston-doubters-parallel-drew-brees-doubters-2006-a.html)

AsylumGuido 05-24-2022 08:53 AM

The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006

Here's the truth. Drew Brees doubters and naysayers were just as passionate in 2006 as the ones who cast doubts about Jameis Winston today.

KYLE T. MOSLEY 1 HOUR AGO

Most Saints fans, some media, and podcasters were too young to recall Drew Brees signing with the team, let alone the negative commentary hurled at the future Hall of Famer.

For most who have "thrown shade" at Winston, it's another example of "convenient amnesia."

Let's be honest, Drew Brees was shown the door in San Diego by a front office executive that the Mannings strategically maneuvered a No. 1 draft pick from the Chargers to swap with the Giants, and the rest is history. Eli wins two Super Bowl rings, Rivers none.


Back to Brees and Winston

Brees was called "hot garbage" because of his injured shoulder. He proved his naysayers wrong through his grit, passion, and excellence in this profession — also a little help from Dr. James Andrews repairing his shoulder.

For everyone who says "Winston Sucks" because of his poor numbers, let's examine.

It took Drew Brees nine seasons before he reached a Super Bowl. Jameis Winston is entering year No. 8. Perhaps, Winston's negative commentary for his dreadful 30 interceptions is somewhat deserving, but the Bucs' offensive was mediocre at best. After seven years in the NFL, Brees had 88 interceptions compared to Winston's 91. Let it sink in.

The same goes for Winston. Jameis sat for a season to rehabilitate his career from a season of greatness and hell. The focus on his 30-30 found plenty wanting to drive him out of Tampa like he was Frankenstein being ousted from the village. (Watch the movie or read the book.) Besides the 30 horrid interceptions, his 5,109 passing yards and 33 touchdowns were impressive for an NFL quarterback in his fifth season.

Here's the bottom line. Jameis ain't Drew and Brees ain't Winston. I think I said that correctly, but let's move on to reality. New Orleans set up Winston for success in 2022. He and every team will have question marks. How will the offensive line protect him? Can Winston gel with Thomas, Landry, and Olave? Will Alvin Kamara be available? What will his relationship be like with Dennis Allen and Pete Carmichael Jr.?

Albeit, the truth lies within the decision-making. Brees tossed 79 interceptions in his first five seasons with New Orleans. In 2006, he deserved to get a pass by winning the Lombardi Trophy — but he was a turnover magnet at times.

Fans and coaches shouldn't be too quick to judge and give Winston the hook this season should he hit a rough patch. Good quarterbacks rise out of dark situations. Great quarterbacks excel through adversity and claim victory with their performances in crunch time. Given a chance, Winston will have that opportunity.

Can it happen?

We shall see.

AsylumGuido 05-24-2022 09:14 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 

SmashMouth 05-24-2022 11:20 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
I think most of us have been echoing this for a while now. We all saw a glimpse last year. He has a chance to do something special this year. One thing is self-evident, he's matured as a person and a player if one compares his behavior from the early part of his career.

K Major 05-24-2022 11:24 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Michael Thomas (hopefully he's healthy in 2022), Landry, Callaway, Harty & Olave & a mauler LT in Trevor P...

Coach Dennis Allen has definitely surrounded Winston with the talent to succeed in 2022.

This season is going to be nuts !

AsylumGuido 05-24-2022 11:27 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 952588)
I think most of us have been echoing this for a while now. We all saw a glimpse last year. He has a chance to do something special this year. One thing is self-evident, he's matured as a person and a player if one compares his behavior from the early part of his career.

One would think it is self-evident, but there are still some that still either define him purely off his college and early professional demeaner or off that one season under "No Risk It, No Biscuit" Arians.

SmashMouth 05-24-2022 01:21 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 952591)
Michael Thomas (hopefully he's healthy in 2022), Landry, Callaway, Harty & Olave & a mauler LT in Trevor P...

Coach Dennis Allen has definitely surrounded Winston with the talent to succeed in 2022.

This season is going to be nuts !

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952592)
One would think it is self-evident, but there are still some that still either define him purely off his college and early professional demeaner or off that one season under "No Risk It, No Biscuit" Arians.

One could argue the best talents Jamay has ever had surrounding him, including his days at Fla St. Arians never gave the beef up front like he did for Pretty TB.

AsylumGuido 05-24-2022 01:47 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 952602)
One could argue the best talents Jamay has ever had surrounding him, including his days at Fla St. Arians never gave the beef up front like he did for Pretty TB.

It's not only the offensive talent around him now. His last two seasons with Tampa Bay he had the 31st (2018 - 29.0/g) and 29th (2019 - 28.1/g) ranked scoring defense in the NFL "supporting" him. The Saints should easily be ranked as a top five defense this coming season.

iceshack149 05-24-2022 02:50 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 952602)
One could argue the best talents Jamay has ever had surrounding him, including his days at Fla St. Arians never gave the beef up front like he did for Pretty TB.

I think Brady has been the GM over the last two years.

AsylumGuido 05-24-2022 04:08 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iceshack149 (Post 952605)
I think Brady has been the GM over the last two years.

And the offensive coordinator.

Lord_Saint83 05-24-2022 05:02 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Jameis with those weapons will be just fine. I have faith in him

darksoul35 05-24-2022 05:08 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
I like Winston. I think we are in a way better place right now than we wouldve been trading for Watson. They just need to trust him and open the playbook up a little. Our defense should be at least close to top 5.

halloween 65 05-24-2022 08:13 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul35 (Post 952612)
I like Winston. I think we are in a way better place right now than we wouldve been trading for Watson. They just need to trust him and open the playbook up a little. Our defense should be at least close to top 5.

That's the question " The Playbook". How much will PC calls or DA of the O ? Myself , I definitely let PC call. If Allen calls the O-plays it's going to be limited. Allen didn't fair well in his last HC job. All the talent in the word want mean a thing if managed wrong. Got to see how he does with the keys of the kingdom
that was aired to him. Running in the middle of the pack want cut it to me.

jeanpierre 05-25-2022 05:03 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
The idea that someone would attempt to draw parallels between Drew Brees and Jameis Winston is illogical, then again not surprised as who wrote this article...

Remember some fans noting the risk, many ignorant of Bree's injury, but the consensus was they'd had enough of Aaron Brooks inconsistent, mediocre-record play...

Personally liked Brooks, especially after I saw a side of him at the Metairie Best Buy where he innocently played pick-a-boo with my baby girl in the DVD section...

Brooks lost me when both he and Haslett turned on Kyle Turley in the media for KT having his QB's back, letting the Jets know they couldn't give his QB the business...

So Brees was a welcomed change and he certainly didn't have Jameis background of suspect behavior, including rape allegations buried by FSU and the alumni...

No matter, Winston's apologists will continue the effort to insulate Winston from criticism; no matter, these were very different situations with little to no parallels...

Brees often played with receivers that would struggle to make other rosters, and yet he produced at an elite level; Winston apparently needs a better supporting cast...

Let's see Winston play under the same scrutiny as other NFL QBs and let him earn the appropriate praise and/or criticism that his play will deserve to receive...

rezburna 05-25-2022 06:03 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
It’s quite simple. Drew Brees is the superior football player. Jameis has more arm talent. He has the size. He has the mobility. However, Brees flourished in every aspect of the game once he came to New Orleans. Because Jameis has more natural talent he of course has a higher ceiling. It’s a ceiling I hope he reaches. If he can’t live up to Brees I won’t hold it against him. It’s only a handful of QB’s in history who can.

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 06:30 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 952616)
The idea that someone would attempt to draw parallels between Drew Brees and Jameis Winston is illogical, then again not surprised as who wrote this article...

Remember some fans noting the risk, many ignorant of Bree's injury, but the consensus was they'd had enough of Aaron Brooks inconsistent, mediocre-record play...

Personally liked Brooks, especially after I saw a side of him at the Metairie Best Buy where he innocently played pick-a-boo with my baby girl in the DVD section...

Brooks lost me when both he and Haslett turned on Kyle Turley in the media for KT having his QB's back, letting the Jets know they couldn't give his QB the business...

So Brees was a welcomed change and he certainly didn't have Jameis background of suspect behavior, including rape allegations buried by FSU and the alumni...

No matter, Winston's apologists will continue the effort to insulate Winston from criticism; no matter, these were very different situations with little to no parallels...

Brees often played with receivers that would struggle to make other rosters, and yet he produced at an elite level; Winston apparently needs a better supporting cast...

Let's see Winston play under the same scrutiny as other NFL QBs and let him earn the appropriate praise and/or criticism that his play will deserve to receive...

You covered a couple different points here JP. Some I agree with some not. My take(s):

While I appreciate his helping us in winning our first playoff game, I never could fully get behind Brooks. To me he never had his head/attitude in the game. His smiling on the sidelines after throwing an Int was the final
straw for me. Nice story about him and your daughter. Though.

You mention the scrutiny Brees played under; was your point that Winston has not had scrutiny? If so I disagree. I think he’s had more. Also not sure about your apologists insulating him comments.

It wasn’t until late in his career that Brees had subpar receivers. Thomas, Meacham, Henderson, Colston, Stills, Snead, Graham, Shockey, Cooks, Sanders (not to mention great receiving backs) all were quality players that could/did play for other teams.

TheOak 05-25-2022 07:00 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rezburna (Post 952618)
It’s quite simple. Drew Brees is the superior football player. Jameis has more arm talent. He has the size. He has the mobility. However, Brees flourished in every aspect of the game once he came to New Orleans. Because Jameis has more natural talent he of course has a higher ceiling. It’s a ceiling I hope he reaches. If he can’t live up to Brees I won’t hold it against him. It’s only a handful of QB’s in history who can.

By nearly all accounts Brees exceeded his perceived ceiling (After all, Drew is too short to see over his centers a** :)), and Jameis could as well have a similar career.

Once you get to the NFL everyone has a high skill floor, the ceiling development depends a lot on the player. Contrasting Drew Brees vs JaMarcus Russell highlights what happens when work ethic out performs unrefined raw talent.

Speculation gets players into the league, application determines how successful they are, and luck determines how long they stay.:bng:

jeanpierre 05-25-2022 07:15 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952619)
You covered a couple different points here JP. Some I agree with some not. My take(s):

While I appreciate his helping us in winning our first playoff game, I never could fully get behind Brooks. To me he never had his head/attitude in the game. His smiling on the sidelines after throwing an Int was the final
straw for me. Nice story about him and your daughter. Though.

For me, the smiling on the sideline while I can see how it upset some, for me, he was just trying to be positive and even keel...

As I said he and Haslett lost me when they threw KT under the media bus; Can't speak to his drive and will to win other than the results...

Yes, that was a genuine moment at Best Buy I appreciated for both...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952619)
You mention the scrutiny Brees played under; was your point that Winston has not had scrutiny? If so I disagree. I think he’s had more. Also not sure about your apologists insulating him comments.

Really didn't mention any scrutiny Brees faced, just said that most fans were not aware of the seriousness of his injury at that time; most of that came out later...

As I do read, share articles that I view in the Twittersphere, I've seen several apologists' takes and my impression is that there's a concerted effort...

One of my factual, statistical criticisms replying to some articles is if you take away the Packers, Redskins games, Winston averaged one (1) PaTd/GM...

Also mention Winston only had one game over 250PaYds and that really riles and ruffles feathers and Payton is blamed for not turning Winston loose...

That's not consistent winning football...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952619)
It wasn’t until late in his career that Brees had subpar receivers. Thomas, Meacham, Henderson, Colston, Stills, Snead, Graham, Shockey, Cooks, Sanders (not to mention great receiving backs) all were quality players that could/did play for other teams.

Brees had an effective rookie Marques Colston, an ineffective Joe Horn (cut after 2006), and Devery running deep while Brees could air it out then...

Brees didn't have many of those mentioned receivers until you get to the SuperBowl year and after, and yet he put up 4400 to 5000 PaYds early on...

Meachem was a bust for a first round pick; in fact he showed up his rookie year out of shape - a receiver; was an early and often critic of that draft pick...

Snead and Lance Moore were both UDFAs that developed into effective underneath route runners and chains movers, but disappeared on other rosters...

Shockey made some plays, he didn't have the impact in this explosive offense that was expected; his fan popularity was more noteworthy than production...

The best receivers Brees had were Colston, Cooks, and Thomas - and that wasn't all at the same time; their play overlapped each just a few seasons between them...

Brees only got recognition when he broke all time passing records and was infamously snubbed from an MVP in 2011 because Rodgers had a higher QBR...

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 07:19 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by halloween 65 (Post 952615)
That's the question " The Playbook". How much will PC calls or DA of the O ? Myself , I definitely let PC call. If Allen calls the O-plays it's going to be limited. Allen didn't fair well in his last HC job. All the talent in the word want mean a thing if managed wrong. Got to see how he does with the keys of the kingdom
that was aired to him. Running in the middle of the pack want cut it to me.

Where did you ever get the idea that Dennis Allen would ever make the offensive calls? That has never been a consideration.

:confused:

jeanpierre 05-25-2022 08:27 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rezburna (Post 952618)
It’s quite simple. Drew Brees is the superior football player. Jameis has more arm talent. He has the size. He has the mobility. However, Brees flourished in every aspect of the game once he came to New Orleans. Because Jameis has more natural talent he of course has a higher ceiling. It’s a ceiling I hope he reaches. If he can’t live up to Brees I won’t hold it against him. It’s only a handful of QB’s in history who can.

Not trying parse your words, but I'd say Brees has been the more successful football player; athletically, you're dead on - Winston wins the Combine contest...

As far QBs success, I'd like to know once season is underway what time in the morning the QBs show; Brees use to open the door for the custodian by some accounts...

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 08:47 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 952621)
For me, the smiling on the sideline while I can see how it upset some, for me, he was just trying to be positive and even keel...

As I said he and Haslett lost me when they threw KT under the media bus; Can't speak to his drive and will to win other than the results...

Yes, that was a genuine moment at Best Buy I appreciated for both...




Really didn't mention any scrutiny Brees faced, just said that most fans were not aware of the seriousness of his injury at that time; most of that came out later...

As I do read, share articles that I view in the Twittersphere, I've seen several apologists' takes and my impression is that there's a concerted effort...

One of my factual, statistical criticisms replying to some articles is if you take away the Packers, Redskins games, Winston averaged one (1) PaTd/GM...

Also mention Winston only had one game over 250PaYds and that really riles and ruffles feathers and Payton is blamed for not turning Winston loose...

That's not consistent winning football...




Brees had an effective rookie Marques Colston, an ineffective Joe Horn (cut after 2006), and Devery running deep while Brees could air it out then...

Brees didn't have many of those mentioned receivers until you get to the SuperBowl year and after, and yet he put up 4400 to 5000 PaYds early on...

Meachem was a bust for a first round pick; in fact he showed up his rookie year out of shape - a receiver; was an early and often critic of that draft pick...

Snead and Lance Moore were both UDFAs that developed into effective underneath route runners and chains movers, but disappeared on other rosters...

Shockey made some plays, he didn't have the impact in this explosive offense that was expected; his fan popularity was more noteworthy than production...

The best receivers Brees had were Colston, Cooks, and Thomas - and that wasn't all at the same time; their play overlapped each just a few seasons between them...

Brees only got recognition when he broke all time passing records and was infamously snubbed from an MVP in 2011 because Rodgers had a higher QBR...

I see. Your “Let's see Winston play under the same scrutiny as other NFL QBs” statement threw me off a little as I feel he’s had great scrutiny. For example he was shredded all over the media for his 30 INT season and people overlooked that he also had 5,000+ yards and 33 TDs that year. By comparison Bret Favre didn’t get near the grief for his 29 INT season in 2005 that had less than 4,000 yards and only 20 TDs. Manning had a worse statistical year than Winston’s early in his career too and he wasn’t knocked as hard as Winston was.

I also think Brees got recognition because the first year he came here he led us to our first NFC championship appearance. And while You are correct that If you take out Winston’s two best games (out of only 6 1/2) he didn’t have great numbers, but he also wasn’t the TO machine he had the label of being. It’s not like any of his replacements did any better.

Plus let’s take a look at Drew’s first year here. If we pull out his two best games (Dallas and Tampa) he had 18 TDs in 14 games. That’s just over 1/game. Very similar to Jameis. Plus he had 11 INTs in those 14 games. That’s worse than Winston’s 2 INT in 4 1/2 games (He threw one against the Redskins game we are throwing out). Just food for thought.

I also think Colston, Horn, and Henderson were better than what Winston had to work with last year.

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 09:14 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952630)
I see. Your “Let's see Winston play under the same scrutiny as other NFL QBs” statement threw me off a little as I feel he’s had great scrutiny. For example he was shredded all over the media for his 30 INT season and people overlooked that he also had 5,000+ yards and 33 TDs that year. By comparison Bret Favre didn’t get near the grief for his 29 INT season in 2005 that had less than 4,000 yards and only 20 TDs. Manning had a worse statistical year than Winston’s early in his career too and he wasn’t knocked as hard as Winston was.

I also think Brees got recognition because the first year he came here he led us to our first NFC championship appearance. And while You are correct that If you take out Winston’s two best games (out of only 6 1/2) he didn’t have great numbers, but he also wasn’t the TO machine he had the label of being. It’s not like any of his replacements did any better.

Plus let’s take a look at Drew’s first year here. If we pull out his two best games (Dallas and Tampa) he had 18 TDs in 14 games. That’s just over 1/game. Very similar to Jameis. Plus he had 11 INTs in those 14 games. That’s worse than Winston’s 2 INT in 4 1/2 games (He threw one against the Redskins game we are throwing out). Just food for thought.

I also think Colston, Horn, and Henderson were better than what Winston had to work with last year.

Dead on, Boston. But Winston detractors ignore those facts. They continue to bring up his college transgressions and his interceptions in an extremely interception friendly offense coupled with one of the worst defenses in the NFL which was always forcing him to play from behind. They ignore that he has been universally loved by his teammates and has been praised as a hard worker by all ... INCLUDING Drew Brees himself.

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 09:20 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952632)
Dead on, Boston. But Winston detractors ignore those facts. They continue to bring up his college transgressions and his interceptions in an extremely interception friendly offense coupled with one of the worst defenses in the NFL which was always forcing him to play from behind. They ignore that he has been universally loved by his teammates and has been praised as a hard worker by all ... INCLUDING Drew Brees himself.

He’s certainly working hard and doing what he can to come back from his injury. I only wish Thomas would have done the same thing.

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 09:26 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952633)
He’s certainly working hard and doing what he can to come back from his injury. I only wish Thomas would have done the same thing.

From what little I have heard and read, Thomas has been working hard to be ready for this coming season. The difference is that his "management team" isn't posting twitter video after twitter video showing what he's doing like Winston's "team". :D

SaintGnome 05-25-2022 09:26 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 952616)

Haslett turned on Kyle Turley in the media for KT having his QB's back, letting the Jets know they couldn't give his QB the business...


This was also when I checked out on Haslett

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 09:27 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952635)
From what little I have heard and read, Thomas has been working hard to be ready for this coming season. The difference is that his "management team" isn't posting twitter video after twitter video showing what he's doing like Winston's "team". :D

Hope so.

SmashMouth 05-25-2022 09:27 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952632)
Dead on, Boston. But Winston detractors ignore those facts. They continue to bring up his college transgressions and his interceptions in an extremely interception friendly offense coupled with one of the worst defenses in the NFL which was always forcing him to play from behind. They ignore that he has been universally loved by his teammates and has been praised as a hard worker by all ... INCLUDING Drew Brees himself.

Media and Social platforms need to generate traffic... even if it means stretching facts to fit their narratives.

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 09:28 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 952638)
Media and Social platforms need to generate traffic... even if it means stretching facts to fit their narratives.

So, so true!

Lord_Saint83 05-25-2022 09:33 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952630)
I see. Your “Let's see Winston play under the same scrutiny as other NFL QBs” statement threw me off a little as I feel he’s had great scrutiny. For example he was shredded all over the media for his 30 INT season and people overlooked that he also had 5,000+ yards and 33 TDs that year. By comparison Bret Favre didn’t get near the grief for his 29 INT season in 2005 that had less than 4,000 yards and only 20 TDs. Manning had a worse statistical year than Winston’s early in his career too and he wasn’t knocked as hard as Winston was.

I also think Brees got recognition because the first year he came here he led us to our first NFC championship appearance. And while You are correct that If you take out Winston’s two best games (out of only 6 1/2) he didn’t have great numbers, but he also wasn’t the TO machine he had the label of being. It’s not like any of his replacements did any better.

Plus let’s take a look at Drew’s first year here. If we pull out his two best games (Dallas and Tampa) he had 18 TDs in 14 games. That’s just over 1/game. Very similar to Jameis. Plus he had 11 INTs in those 14 games. That’s worse than Winston’s 2 INT in 4 1/2 games (He threw one against the Redskins game we are throwing out). Just food for thought.

I also think Colston, Horn, and Henderson were better than what Winston had to work with last year.



I agree with you on that. Some people don’t remember that it took Drew until about the 09 season to fully master the offense. He came to us as a qb that was good but not great, yet. He was benched a few times in SD and until they drafted Rivers did he get a grasp on the game. I’m in no way bashing Drew but what I’m saying is he had bumps on his way to greatness and some guys take a while to figure it out. Jameis is just gonna be a guy that is damned if you damned if you don’t. Just like Stafford

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 10:18 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord_Saint83 (Post 952640)
I agree with you on that. Some people don’t remember that it took Drew until about the 09 season to fully master the offense. He came to us as a qb that was good but not great, yet. He was benched a few times in SD and until they drafted Rivers did he get a grasp on the game. I’m in no way bashing Drew but what I’m saying is he had bumps on his way to greatness and some guys take a while to figure it out. Jameis is just gonna be a guy that is damned if you damned if you don’t. Just like Stafford

Absolutely, LS! This subject came up on one of Bruce Murray's shows on NFL Radio very recently. They were trying to come up with this year's Matthew Stafford (a QB taking over a different team that could have great success) and both Murray, and I believe Kirk Morrison, came up with Jameis being the most likely to fit that bill in 2022.

K Major 05-25-2022 10:35 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 952638)
Media and Social platforms need to generate traffic... even if it means stretching facts to fit their narratives.

https://media4.giphy.com/media/LpM87...giphy.gif&ct=g

K Major 05-25-2022 10:41 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952632)
Dead on, Boston. But Winston detractors ignore those facts. They continue to bring up his college transgressions and his interceptions in an extremely interception friendly offense coupled with one of the worst defenses in the NFL which was always forcing him to play from behind. They ignore that he has been universally loved by his teammates and has been praised as a hard worker by all ... INCLUDING Drew Brees himself.

I've just come to accept this type of feedback and negative criticism from some fans and the media as it relates to JW.

Before the unfortunate ACL tear last season, Jameis had a 5:1 TD/INT ratio, yet somehow what he did in 2019 (Tampa) is still brought up :rolleyes:.

jeanpierre 05-25-2022 10:42 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952630)
I see. Your “Let's see Winston play under the same scrutiny as other NFL QBs” statement threw me off a little as I feel he’s had great scrutiny. For example he was shredded all over the media for his 30 INT season and people overlooked that he also had 5,000+ yards and 33 TDs that year. By comparison Bret Favre didn’t get near the grief for his 29 INT season in 2005 that had less than 4,000 yards and only 20 TDs. Manning had a worse statistical year than Winston’s early in his career too and he wasn’t knocked as hard as Winston was.

Media coverage has been far more favorable for Winston, if anything; the criticisms (not all is bad) has been in replies to articles, or tweets with links to articles...

Have seen the obsession of Winston one season with Arians that you refer, but I've looked at his five years and wasn't impressed with his development, progression...

In so far as the comparison to Favre, Favre really played in two different eras of NFL football...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952630)
I also think Brees got recognition because the first year he came here he led us to our first NFC championship appearance. And while You are correct that If you take out Winston’s two best games (out of only 6 1/2) he didn’t have great numbers, but he also wasn’t the TO machine he had the label of being. It’s not like any of his replacements did any better.

It's ironic you mention in your second line he wasn't a TO machine, and that's absolute correct, and yet Winston's supporters argue Payton limited him?!?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952630)
Plus let’s take a look at Drew’s first year here. If we pull out his two best games (Dallas and Tampa) he had 18 TDs in 14 games. That’s just over 1/game. Very similar to Jameis. Plus he had 11 INTs in those 14 games. That’s worse than Winston’s 2 INT in 4 1/2 games (He threw one against the Redskins game we are throwing out). Just food for thought.

I also think Colston, Horn, and Henderson were better than what Winston had to work with last year.

Well let's see Winston play; he's had his Lasix, declared himself ready to go today to NFLN, and there's never been a better Saints roster than now, so we shall see...

While we mentioned Horn, he was awful in his last season; many of the interceptions were because Horn was in the wrong place, failed to make his reads...

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 11:22 AM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Agree that he has no excuses (maybe his injury) now. On paper he has the tools at WR. He should be able to get near his 5000 yard, 33 Td season while still keeping TOs down. The improved D (vs what he had in Tampa) should ensure that.

That being said I am a little worried about the RB situation, esp if Kamara has a suspension. If not he he is still likely to miss a handful of games with injuries. So, I say we have a few question marks at RB. I also don’t like our TE situation unless the Krull steps up. So the RB and TE question marks are worrisome issues just like Winston had at Tampa even though he had good WRs.

i do think Payton drilled into him to not thrown INTs..so that kept him down. But so did the lack of quality receivers and TEs. Maybe Payton told him to keep things in check because he felt he didn’t have TEs or WRs that could be trusted to make plays. That happened to Drew in the playoff loss to tampa…his TE fumbled and his WRs weren’t stepping up without a healthy Thomas.

You are right though that the proof will be on the field. I am very optimistic.

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 12:01 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952662)
Agree that he has no excuses (maybe his injury) now. On paper he has the tools at WR. He should be able to get near his 5000 yard, 33 Td season while still keeping TOs down. The improved D (vs what he had in Tampa) should ensure that.

That being said I am a little worried about the RB situation, esp if Kamara has a suspension. If not he he is still likely to miss a handful of games with injuries. So, I say we have a few question marks at RB. I also don’t like our TE situation unless the Krull steps up. So the RB and TE question marks are worrisome issues just like Winston had at Tampa even though he had good WRs.

i do think Payton drilled into him to not thrown INTs..so that kept him down. But so did the lack of quality receivers and TEs. Maybe Payton told him to keep things in check because he felt he didn’t have TEs or WRs that could be trusted to make plays. That happened to Drew in the playoff loss to tampa…his TE fumbled and his WRs weren’t stepping up without a healthy Thomas.

You are right though that the proof will be on the field. I am very optimistic.

Don't forget about Taysom Hill at TE. He was the 19th rated TE (2022 PPR projections) in our dynasty/legacy league draft going on right now.

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 12:09 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952664)
Don't forget about Taysom Hill at TE. He was the 19th rated TE (2022 PPR projections) in our dynasty/legacy league draft going on right now.

Good point. He slipped my mind.

AsylumGuido 05-25-2022 12:13 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952667)
Good point. He slipped my mind.

He's slipped several minds. Somehow, the fantasy sites are on top of it, however.

Boston Saint 05-25-2022 12:18 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 952668)
He's slipped several minds. Somehow, the fantasy sites are on top of it, however.

Since this is a Winston thread, mentioning Hill brings up another point; Winston still has never had a full training camp/preseason/ under the Saints where he was the number 1 and got to run with the first stringers without sharing time. That’s a big disadvantage for him and Another thing people forget about him.

jeanpierre 05-25-2022 12:19 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Saint (Post 952662)
Agree that he has no excuses (maybe his injury) now. On paper he has the tools at WR. He should be able to get near his 5000 yard, 33 Td season while still keeping TOs down. The improved D (vs what he had in Tampa) should ensure that.

That being said I am a little worried about the RB situation, esp if Kamara has a suspension. If not he he is still likely to miss a handful of games with injuries. So, I say we have a few question marks at RB. I also don’t like our TE situation unless the Krull steps up. So the RB and TE question marks are worrisome issues just like Winston had at Tampa even though he had good WRs.

i do think Payton drilled into him to not thrown INTs..so that kept him down. But so did the lack of quality receivers and TEs. Maybe Payton told him to keep things in check because he felt he didn’t have TEs or WRs that could be trusted to make plays. That happened to Drew in the playoff loss to tampa…his TE fumbled and his WRs weren’t stepping up without a healthy Thomas.

You are right though that the proof will be on the field. I am very optimistic.

Sure wished we still had Dan Campbell coaching TEs; like Dan Roushar, but not sure how his duties lay out between TEs and Run Game Coordinator...

We also just added Kahale Warring who's got a poor history of staying healthy, but he's athletically a dancing bear; fingers crossed?

Krull left Florida because he was stuck behind Kyle Pitts on the depth chart so he transferred to Pitt and though he only had one season, it was an impressive one...

Quietly optimistic about the depth of the TE position; but as we get into Training Camp/PreSeason, you may recall this conversation...

SmashMouth 05-25-2022 12:26 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 952670)
Sure wished we still had Dan Campbell coaching TEs; like Dan Roushar, but not sure how his duties lay out between TEs and Run Game Coordinator...

We also just added Kahale Warring who's got a poor history of staying healthy, but he's athletically a dancing bear; fingers crossed?

Krull left Florida because he was stuck behind Kyle Pitts on the depth chart so he transferred to Pitt and though he only had one season, it was an impressive one...

Quietly optimistic about the depth of the TE position; but as we get into Training Camp/PreSeason, you may recall this conversation...

What if he turns out to be better than Kyle Pitts? Wouldn't be the first time a college coach biffed up on evaluating a player only to see that player far outdo/exceed his choice.

jeanpierre 05-25-2022 03:02 PM

Re: The Jameis Winston Doubters Parallel the Drew Brees Doubters of 2006
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmashMouth (Post 952673)
What if he turns out to be better than Kyle Pitts? Wouldn't be the first time a college coach biffed up on evaluating a player only to see that player far outdo/exceed his choice.

From your lips to the Football Gods Will...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com