Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

I've just read

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I like how we go after players past their prime thinking they can revive their careers on a struggling team. Whatever....

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2005, 07:47 PM   #1
100th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 275
RE: I

I like how we go after players past their prime thinking they can revive their careers on a struggling team. Whatever.
Savant is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:16 AM   #2
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 610
Re: RE: I

Originally Posted by Savant
I like how we go after players past their prime thinking they can revive their careers on a struggling team. Whatever.
Huh??

So Mike McKenzie and Dwight Smith are past their primes?

Who specifically are you referring to?

(And please don't go back more than 2 years)
TheGambler is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:57 AM   #3
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
(And please don't go back more than 2 years)
Why would you restrict the guy's right to defend himself by saying don't go back more than two years? Hasn't the current regime been here 6? I would think he would at least get the amount of time the current group of coaches and GM has been here. Isn't that fair?
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 10:13 AM   #4
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 3,369
Blog Entries: 34
Az-Hakim comes to mind immediately, as does McKinnon, Conwell, Macafee, and Meier.

Of the 5, only McKinnon seems to not cost us much and adds to his role. Conwell's been hit or miss since he got here, when he's been healthy. Macafee is clearly here for leadership, certainly not his ball handling skills. Meier and Az-Hakim are just look-squaders getting paid handsomely for nothing.
xan is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 10:25 AM   #5
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Well, you can add Ambrose last year, and Dale Carter the year before. If under the entire regime, Gandy comes to mind. Norman Hand also. I was never sold on Bellamy, and was pissed we re-signed him this offseason.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 05:02 PM   #6
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by xan
Az-Hakim comes to mind immediately.

I woudln't write Hakim off as a loss just yet...
TheGambler is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 05:03 PM   #7
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
Well, you can add Ambrose last year, and Dale Carter the year before. If under the entire regime, Gandy comes to mind. Norman Hand also. I was never sold on Bellamy, and was pissed we re-signed him this offseason.

Gandy and Bellamy did well in my opinion..................you're right about AA and DC though.
TheGambler is offline  
Old 10-06-2005, 05:45 PM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,367
I woudln't write Hakim off as a loss just yet...
Agreed. My gut feeling is he's probably ready and able to prove his worth. Let me be the first to say it - our starting WR's and backups are nothing to sneeze at. A talented bunch, I must say.



8)
TallySaint is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts