Who is your dark horse for the 53 man roster?

AsylumGuido · 07-12-2023, 03:17 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

[/B]

I thought that a receiver needs to get open if he's not a possession receiver like Michael Thomas. 3Q doesn't get separation nor does he make the contested catches. I'm just being honest here. He doesn't get much separation and his best attribute is his blocking. Come on mow, surely there are better UDFA's who could do better. I'm tired of the 3Q saga! Obviously, you aren't, but most of the board agrees that he has been a disappointment. Let that sink in for a moment. Sometimes we have to step back and see what other people think. He has to prove himself in training camp and if he doesn't....then good riddance!

Edit: He may not have a high drop ratio but he's flat out unreliable!

The problem is because of injuries he was asked, along with Callaway, to assume the role of a #1 or #2 WR. He certainly isn't that nor should we have had to put him in that situation. We really won't be asking much more than what Tre'Quan is good at from any of the WR's past Thomas, Olave, or Shaheem. Personally I don't care whether or not we replace Tre'Quan. I just want to make sure who we keep can do what he does do at a high level.

I'm basically just relaying what I expect the Saints to do. They know what he is better than any of us. It simply wouldn't surprise me if he makes the squad again. It does no good to have a #5 WR that can run good routes, get open, and can't block worth a crap.

07-12-2023, 03:17 PM	#16
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: Who is your dark horse for the 53 man roster? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II [/B] I thought that a receiver needs to get open if he's not a possession receiver like Michael Thomas. 3Q doesn't get separation nor does he make the contested catches. I'm just being honest here. He doesn't get much separation and his best attribute is his blocking. Come on mow, surely there are better UDFA's who could do better. I'm tired of the 3Q saga! Obviously, you aren't, but most of the board agrees that he has been a disappointment. Let that sink in for a moment. Sometimes we have to step back and see what other people think. He has to prove himself in training camp and if he doesn't....then good riddance! Edit: He may not have a high drop ratio but he's flat out unreliable! The problem is because of injuries he was asked, along with Callaway, to assume the role of a #1 or #2 WR. He certainly isn't that nor should we have had to put him in that situation. We really won't be asking much more than what Tre'Quan is good at from any of the WR's past Thomas, Olave, or Shaheem. Personally I don't care whether or not we replace Tre'Quan. I just want to make sure who we keep can do what he does do at a high level. I'm basically just relaying what I expect the Saints to do. They know what he is better than any of us. It simply wouldn't surprise me if he makes the squad again. It does no good to have a #5 WR that can run good routes, get open, and can't block worth a crap.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill