Which former Saint player do you miss the most?

TheGambler · 10-10-2005, 11:33 AM

Double post

saintswhodi · 10-10-2005, 11:35 AM

I responded to Saints LB, you responded to me. See the difference? In other threads, you respond TO ME, see the difference? Is there an ounce of truth in you? Yet even when I responded to LB, I didn't feel the need to name call you. But of course, that's above you. Have a nice day.

TheGambler · 10-10-2005, 11:40 AM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

I responded to Saints LB, you responded to me. See the difference? In other threads, you respond TO ME, see the difference? Is there an ounce of truth in you? Yet even when I responded to LB, I didn't feel the need to name call you. But of course, that's above you. Have a nice day.

And yet the question still stands, liar, where did I ever claim to be "above everyone"?

Nobody is stupid. Your "reply" was an obvious attempt to encourage his idiotic behavior. If you hand't replied at all, then you woudln't have been called out on anything, now would you? And yet, in your idiotic mind, you feel as though you've done nothing wrong, as usual.

Last week you repeatedly embarrassed yourself by behaving similarly. Save yourself some trouble and just drop it.

saintswhodi · 10-10-2005, 11:49 AM

LMAO. Embarrassed myself? Kid, you're a liar, who posted threads that proved he was one. Yet somehow you think attempting to call me one will make you look justified? Pathetic. Did it hurt your feelings I posted to someone else so you HAD to post to me? Try this, if I don't post to you, don't post to me. I GUARANTEE there is no way in hell you can avoid posting to me and getting smacked down as normal. But I also guarantee you this, if you do not post to me, I will not post one word to you. And I will put $100 on that right now. Since you are "above it" put your money where your mouth is. Or you can just keep lying and having it displayed. Either way.

Your "reply" was an obvious attempt to encourage his idiotic behavior

Cause you don't agree with LB it was idiotic behavior? Yeah, I see how you are so "above it." LMAO!!!

TheGambler · 10-10-2005, 11:51 AM

By the way, I'm going to play your little game:

Originally Posted by TheGambler

Where did I ever say that. As Chris Griffin would say: LIAR!!!!!!! I"m above you and that other jerk............but you 2 don't constitute "everyone" by any means. Just last week you got onto me about interrupitng your thread with nonsense....and yet you did the same thing in THIS thread of mine. But I woudl't dare accuse you of trying to stir the pot in this thread, because you NEVER do anything WRONG WHATSOEVER.

Anyway, take your Eddie Haskell routine elsewhere.

This was my reply to you. Name one thing I said in this thread that isn't true. I said you interrupted my thread with NONSENSE (Go Get em Saint LB! , followed by some moronic emoticon), and you did. Name one thing in this thread that is a "lie".

Nevertheless, you replied with:

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

I responded to Saints LB, you responded to me. See the difference? In other threads, you respond TO ME, see the difference? Is there an ounce of truth in you? Yet even when I responded to LB, I didn't feel the need to name call you. But of course, that's above you. Have a nice day.

What do the specifics of "who replied to who" have to do with lying?

From now on, I"m going to start calling you out on your BS accusations. This crap you normally pull isn't gonna fly anymore.

TheGambler · 10-10-2005, 12:22 PM

I find it pretty amazing that nobody seemed to have a real problem with this thread until a few select individuals had to chime in.

saintswhodi · 10-10-2005, 12:25 PM

So no on the $100 bet? I didn't think so.

TheGambler · 10-10-2005, 12:32 PM

Originally Posted by saintswhodi

So no on the $100 bet? I didn't think so.

Nice attempt at deflecting from everything I said.

Anyway, if you don't want to see my replies, just put me on ignore. I am strongly considering doing so with you.

In fact. You know what? I'm done considering. You will never have to worry about seeing my replies, because as of this moment you are now on ignore. After all, you can't possibly be a problem if you're not there, right?

Poof.

saintswhodi · 10-10-2005, 01:06 PM

SaintStoneyMount · 10-10-2005, 01:15 PM

Tune in tomorrow for another episode of ....As the BG Turns.....LOL

10-10-2005, 11:33 AM	#21
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Double post
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

10-10-2005, 11:40 AM	#23
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by saintswhodi I responded to Saints LB, you responded to me. See the difference? In other threads, you respond TO ME, see the difference? Is there an ounce of truth in you? Yet even when I responded to LB, I didn't feel the need to name call you. But of course, that's above you. Have a nice day. And yet the question still stands, liar, where did I ever claim to be "above everyone"? Nobody is stupid. Your "reply" was an obvious attempt to encourage his idiotic behavior. If you hand't replied at all, then you woudln't have been called out on anything, now would you? And yet, in your idiotic mind, you feel as though you've done nothing wrong, as usual. Last week you repeatedly embarrassed yourself by behaving similarly. Save yourself some trouble and just drop it.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

10-10-2005, 11:51 AM	#25
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	By the way, I'm going to play your little game: Originally Posted by TheGambler Where did I ever say that. As Chris Griffin would say: LIAR!!!!!!! I"m above you and that other jerk............but you 2 don't constitute "everyone" by any means. Just last week you got onto me about interrupitng your thread with nonsense....and yet you did the same thing in THIS thread of mine. But I woudl't dare accuse you of trying to stir the pot in this thread, because you NEVER do anything WRONG WHATSOEVER. Anyway, take your Eddie Haskell routine elsewhere. This was my reply to you. Name one thing I said in this thread that isn't true. I said you interrupted my thread with NONSENSE (Go Get em Saint LB! , followed by some moronic emoticon), and you did. Name one thing in this thread that is a "lie". Nevertheless, you replied with: Originally Posted by saintswhodi I responded to Saints LB, you responded to me. See the difference? In other threads, you respond TO ME, see the difference? Is there an ounce of truth in you? Yet even when I responded to LB, I didn't feel the need to name call you. But of course, that's above you. Have a nice day. What do the specifics of "who replied to who" have to do with lying? From now on, I"m going to start calling you out on your BS accusations. This crap you normally pull isn't gonna fly anymore.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

10-10-2005, 12:22 PM	#26
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	I find it pretty amazing that nobody seemed to have a real problem with this thread until a few select individuals had to chime in.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

10-10-2005, 12:32 PM	#28
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610	Originally Posted by saintswhodi So no on the $100 bet? I didn't think so. Nice attempt at deflecting from everything I said. Anyway, if you don't want to see my replies, just put me on ignore. I am strongly considering doing so with you. In fact. You know what? I'm done considering. You will never have to worry about seeing my replies, because as of this moment you are now on ignore. After all, you can't possibly be a problem if you're not there, right? Poof.
TheGambler 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 610

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-10-2005, 11:35 AM	#22
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	I responded to Saints LB, you responded to me. See the difference? In other threads, you respond TO ME, see the difference? Is there an ounce of truth in you? Yet even when I responded to LB, I didn't feel the need to name call you. But of course, that's above you. Have a nice day.

10-10-2005, 11:49 AM	#24
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	LMAO. Embarrassed myself? Kid, you're a liar, who posted threads that proved he was one. Yet somehow you think attempting to call me one will make you look justified? Pathetic. Did it hurt your feelings I posted to someone else so you HAD to post to me? Try this, if I don't post to you, don't post to me. I GUARANTEE there is no way in hell you can avoid posting to me and getting smacked down as normal. But I also guarantee you this, if you do not post to me, I will not post one word to you. And I will put $100 on that right now. Since you are "above it" put your money where your mouth is. Or you can just keep lying and having it displayed. Either way. Your "reply" was an obvious attempt to encourage his idiotic behavior Cause you don't agree with LB it was idiotic behavior? Yeah, I see how you are so "above it." LMAO!!!

10-10-2005, 12:25 PM	#27
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	So no on the $100 bet? I didn't think so.

10-10-2005, 01:06 PM	#29
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941

10-10-2005, 01:15 PM	#30
SaintStoneyMount 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Stone Mountain, GA Posts: 448	Tune in tomorrow for another episode of ....As the BG Turns.....LOL