![]() |
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Another thing to point out is the “soft schedule” rhetoric. 4 teams the Saints played won playoff games. That’s noteworthy.
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
You could be right. Then again it depends on what one considers a pot of a season. Carolina and New England were hoping for a season as good as the Saints had. Buffalo fans probably are more posses than most.
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
Lots of reasons why the Saints failed in 2023 ... coaching is at the top of my list. Taking your foot off the neck of the Packers (blew a big lead), being unprepared coming off a bye week and losing to back up QBs. IIRC the Saints were relatively healthy most of the season. Front office better make the right hire at OC, hit on this 2024 draft class & in Free Agency. Saints have work to do. Duly noted though. |
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
|
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
So what’s your definition of suck ass since you seem so fond of using anal analogies about others. |
Re: Pete Carmichael analytics show you something.
Quote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F-6YhA1W...g&name=900x900 The Saints obviously played subpar ball offensively last season. They started slow in most games and the play calling was ineffective. Where were the screen passes? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com