Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?

		New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?

Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II [B] I agree. But, we do need an Alpha somewhere! At Head Coach, it would make a big difference for us right about now....

18Likes

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display Modes

12-18-2023, 02:55 PM	#10
Sinner 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 4,068	Re: Was Loomis not Haslett responsible for starting an injured Brooks over Delhomme? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II [B] I agree. But, we do need an Alpha somewhere! At Head Coach, it would make a big difference for us right about now. Rugby Saint II and K Major like this.
Sinner 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 4,068

« Week Sixteen: Saints @ Rams | Saints hire Dennis Allen as Head Coach »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.