There's also some thought by some that Saints whiffed on not retaining Dan Campbell in some capacity, and then elevating him to HC. Would you consider Dan Campbell's decisions in the NFCCG on foregoing the FGs similar to DAs decisions here on more than one occasion? Just how different do you guesstimate our fortunes here would have fared under Dan Campbell? It's the very same cap management team at the end of the day. Detroit took in our oft injured golden haired LB and made him a starter.

Dan Campbell has been catching hell all morning for his decision making. He looked more like Chargers' recently fired coach Brandon Staley with some of the in game moves than any sort of revolutionary head coach.

Let's not forget that part way through last season Campbell had a record of 4-19-1 as the Lions' Head Coach and Detroit fans were calling for him to be fired immediately. Let's just wait this out and see if he can bounce back.

How funny … or sad, that here we are, talking about Dan Campbell bouncing back, when it’s Dennis Allen that needs to be bounced out of the building.

Probably true...

This will be DA's third year coming up, correct? And this was DC's third year. Does any correlation make sense in terms of allowing DA to flourish in his third year?

DC had arguably a tougher path to navigate to elevate Detroit to the NFCCG.

Campbell's path was made a good deal smoother by the Packers losing their future Hall of Fame QB prior to the season and the Vikings losing their starting QB, as well, with Nick Mullens and Jaren Hall both starting multiple games. Not to mention facing the powerhouse NFC South. LOL!

Campbell's path was made a good deal smoother by the Packers losing their future Hall of Fame QB prior to the season and the Vikings losing their starting QB, as well, with Nick Mullens and Jaren Hall both starting multiple games. Not to mention facing the powerhouse NFC South. LOL!