![]() |
Is it safe to say...
...that there is no Ace QB1 currently on our roster? Seems like we have interrim QB's but not the future of the franchise in Haener, Rattler, or Shough.
I've never been a tank kind of guy but this season is going to be a bad one on offense. Arch? Are we in the running? |
Re: Is it safe to say...
I am trying not to be too hard on Shough since he is a rookie with only limited time, in preseason games, to judge him on. But I really don't see anything to get excited about.
I think Rattler gives us our best chance at winning. And that chance is small. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Will we be in the running for Arch? Yes if he declares.
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Trent Dilfer says hello. He sports a SB ring. There are others.
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Arch is having too much fun down in Austin & he hasn’t played a whole lot of football at UT. Both uncles (Eli & Payton) stayed for their senior year in college.
Probably won’t see Arch’s name appear in the draft until 2027. I don’t think Coach Moore will end the “Shough experiment” so quickly. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Only problem with Arch is his grandfather has explicitly stated that Arch will be at Texas for 2 more years (this year and next year).
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
Look, I know preseason looks bad - at least not what we're all hoping to see - but things will improve. Don't expect the same results many of us saw in '06. That was a different roster. Since then, all we've done is "more of the same" and risky draft after risky draft. Maybe the reset wasn't planned, but it's needed and I'm confident Kellen and his staff can turn it around eventually. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Offensive line could crush this team again this season. Praying some young talent are able to step up now.
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Let's wait to see when we actually play starters across the board.
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Rattler and Shough are both raffle tickets with a 1 in 20 shot to be franchise QBs, at best. Its smart to take those kind of shots but dumb to watch one highlight reel from college or scrimmage and pretend that a longshot is a sure bet. Whichever of the two show the most, depending on what they show this year, we could go into next year looking at one of them as a starter who need a backup with upside, a possible starter who needs competition, or we could be looking for a new de-facto started in 2026. Even in the best of those cases, where one looks good enough to position themselves as the defacto started for 2026, its still more like they would become the next Derek Anderson, Jake Delhomme, Jake Plummer, Jason Campbell, Jacoby Brisset, Jay Cutler, Kyle Orton, Will Levis, Alex Smith, etc than a franchise QB. Some middle round pick QBs become stars. Some star QBs take awhile to develop. Some lose their first 6 games. Some enter the NFL at an older age after many college injuries. But stack all those factors and what we have are major longshots. Lets just take the shots, enjoy the show, and know that if they fail, we will have a high pick. Thats the beauty of leaving the insurance policy place by not cancelling it.
Arch is unlikely to enter the 2025 draft unless he has an amazing, likely national championship season, where he has more to lose than to gain by playing another year of college. His uncles played 4 years, but still had more to prove their senior year. But if he does win a natty, there will also be the temptation to attempt a repeat. So, its unlikely he will be available. But if your QBs fail and we have a top pick, often there are other QBs who will emerge. Neither Burrow not Daniels was considered a likely early first round pick before their senior year. There is a fair chance someone will emerge. If they don't we can use the pick on a key position player and continue to rebuild. Or we can try to find the right QB in free agency, those please not a 10 year loser like Carr was. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Not only are neither of these guys likely to be the franchise QB, we are also putting them behind an O line where neither Guard spot can play to even an average level.
It's a recipe for disaster. How Ruiz still has a starting job is beyond me, he's awful |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
In other words, we're stuck with both Ruiz and Penning until better options are found. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
He ended Brees's Career and he'll end up getting one of the young QBs injured too |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Great input here from Underhill and Triplett. They talk about the importance of McCoy to the overall offensive line play, especially with young QB's. Coverage calls lies heavily upon his shoulders because the QB's simply don't have the identification abilities practiced yet. They said the two breakdowns that appeared to come by Ruiz were stunts from Fuaga's man.
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
In case you don't have the 40 minutes to watch the whole thing ...
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
QB is actually #4 on my list of worries behind ...
1) can we protect the QB (especially with sketchy guard situations)? 2) can we stuff the run? 3) are the CB's good enough to not become a major deficiency? |
Re: Is it safe to say...
We need better Guard play. That's step one. This team should be built around Kelvin Banks and Taliese Fuaga. Both QB's have added pressure due to our inability to run the football. The lack of interior push is a major factor in that. I'm praying Devin Neal is exactly what he was in a college.
Also, this team needs to push the ball down the field. That's when they seem to be a their best. They look really good when they're just letting it rip. It backs the defenders up and opens up things underneath, including designed runs and QB scrambles. This team and organization lacks identity. They need to figure out who they are and who they want to be ASAP. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
Carson Tyler Typically it’s fairly simple. Good communication and technique amongst the Guard, the Tackle, and sometimes the Center. You want to see them moving in unison at the start of the play, basically like robots. Their hips should be square and they should be balanced with good knee bend. Think of a simplified goal of gap integrity. Each lineman is responsible for protecting a gap in the line pre-snap and blocking a corresponding defender. When facing a stunt, if the offensive line has good vision and can see what’s going on, then the tackle (or whichever lineman is initially blocking the stunting defensive lineman) will immediately see when the defender commits to the stunt, make a switch call with the lineman next to him, and square up the new defender who is picking up where the stunting defender left off. In turn, the guard (or whichever offensive lineman has the responsibility of picking up the switch call) identifies the new assignment and squares up the stunting defender. A stunt takes a bit of time to develop, when the DE makes the move and cuts inside towards a middle gap. So, it’s critical for the offensive linemen to work as a unit and stay disciplined and square to avoid overcommitting and turning their shoulders too early. The moment, say, a guard overcommits, turns his hips and shoulders at an angle, and inadvertently double teams a defensive tackle, the line is vulnerable to a stunting end who can blow by that guard down the middle. Note that the center still has a role of organizing the line pre-snap to guard the stunt. As an example, say the offensive line is facing a 4 player defensive front, and the defense runs a stunt with both DEs crashing the middle gap and the DTs taking the corresponding edges. The Center must make a choice - square up the left DE or the right DE. Once the Center picks a side/DE, that’s a 3v2 matchup on that side of the offensive line - on the other side of the line, it’s a 2v2 matchup. Ideally the guards are on the same page and know who has the extra help from the Center. But, at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how disciplined the tackles and the guards are about switching their assignments on a stunt if a guard is being completely overpowered at the LOS before the stunt even begins. In this situation, the defensive line is going to get pressure. The offensive line is simply in no position to make a switch to pick up the stunt. So, like every other concept in football, it’s a combination of strategy, technique, intelligence, and winning individual 1v1 matchups. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
At best I’m just hoping they’re competitive and develop some of the younger players that will be here next season. I’m prepared for a 5 win or less season. If they do better, that’s fantastic. But with offensive line issues, inexperienced QB play and depth problems on both sides of the ball, this is gonna be a tough one. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
Once he went down, the wheels fell off completely last season. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
People are excited about Arch Manning because he was the #1 overall recruit in the nation at one time, his grandfather and two of his uncles were top NFL QBs, and he is a solid 6'4". Yes we haven't seen what he can do at the college level yet but plenty of teams would give a 1st round pick for him now based on the upside and potential. He is no sure thing, and he will have to live up to expectations in college to cement his status as an early 1st round pick, but if teams could draft him now, he would go in the first round unless he plays poorly to prove he is not worth it. He has the most upside of any QB who is not yet in the NFL.
I hope Shough or Rattler shows something this year. I hope its somehow so great that they are the answer at QB. But as it stands, its more likely that Arch Manning becomes a pro bowler than Shough or Rattler. They were both high ranking recruits too, but they have since shown negative things in college, injuries, and Rattlers middling pro resume. Manning has the size of Shough without the age or injuries, and Shough had done nothing by Mannings current age, nor has he really ever had a college season we wouldn't call a letdown for Manning. Signing a veteran QB now would be stupid. There are many issues on our team now beyond just QB, so to really contend we either need a QB for the future when the rest of our team is better or a QB who can be so great this year that they make up for other issues, the highest upside, a sensation. Guys like Garappalo would be a safety net that might get us from 4 wins to 6 wins, and all that gets us is a worse draft pick. The only veteran QB I would consider is Dorian-Thompson Robinson because if things go sideways, I think he is the best tanker the league has seen since Chris Weinke and could confidently deliver us the #1 overall pick. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
It’s wild that this is probably the first season (preseason game#2) where we fans are pretty much already resolved to having a bad year, THIS SOON…
Y’all gotta admit, it’s probably an all time low. Still digging our front office? |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
It will be interesting what the Saints roster looks like after all those players hit the market after the final cut down date. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
"win/loss" season this year. The rebuild we wanted is here The coaching changes we lobbied for have happened The draft we needed most likely just happened The cap room we hoped for is favorable for the first time in over a decade IMO, the reasons for optimism far outweigh the perceived negatives from 2 preseason games. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
When our offensive line was the best in the league we had all five players playing well over 90% of the snaps on the season. I really think that is more of the issue today than the personnel. |
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
I'm not perturbed by preseason. The success of this team will be based on the ability or inability of the starters to stay on the field. Depth isn't a strength of this roster, and we've been watching back ups play with an occasional starter here and there. No Justin Reid, Demario Davis, Chase Young, Carl Granderson, Davon Godchaux, Julian Blackmon, etc. And we already know we need ALL hands on deck offensively for that to work. We won't get a decent read on this team until week 1.
|
Re: Is it safe to say...
Quote:
Exactly! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com