|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; ...it was that was saying that Smith wasn't the #1 receiver in Carolina, while Muhammad was there? I think it was during the preseason, tried to do a search, but it's not working....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
Does anyone remember who...
...it was that was saying that Smith wasn't the #1 receiver in Carolina, while Muhammad was there? I think it was during the preseason, tried to do a search, but it's not working.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
RE: Does anyone remember who...
That is a Billyesque point .
Try Gambler . |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Trust me, that was Billy. I know, cause I had the argument with him when I was laying out all the people who got hurt for Carolina, and Jake still having a better year than AB. When I said Smith, he said Smith was not a number one anyway, Muhammed was. I laughed then, and I am laughing even harder now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockley, Tx
Posts: 1,515
|
BlackonBlack = Billy
Gotta be |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
One day you truly will stop embarrassing yourself, and actually say something that is correct, and shock us all.
2003: Steve Smith - 88 catches 1100 yards 7 TDs 2003: Muhsin Muhammed - 54 catches 837 yards 3 TDs. Who was the number one again? Please stop embarrassing yourself in EVERY thread. And lynwood, I think you are right. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockley, Tx
Posts: 1,515
|
Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
one name Reggie Bush. He's doing it all for USC. You put your best player in the positions that will help your team best.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
Cause prior to 2003 he wasn't the number one receiver.
![]() Just to make yourself look even sillier, go look at Muhammed's numbers from 2002 also. He wasn't even a number one receiver then. He has only had one or two good years, and that was like 3-5 years ago. Your lack of knowledge is just getting apalling. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hockley, Tx
Posts: 1,515
|
Originally Posted by BlackonBlack
Hopefully the Saints.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,768
|
I remember being a big part of that thread... I believe we pulled up a crap load of stats proving Smith was the number one receiver there. I can't remember who was debating against us though. Before Muhammad had that big year last season... the previous 2 or 3 seasons Smith had better numbers than Muhammad. That case was closed during the offseason...
![]() |
![]() |