|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I don't like bringing this to the attention of others, but not talking about it does not do it justice. These are the facts: New Orleans is a small market by NFL standards, even before Katrina devastated the city. Most ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 770
|
I have to state the case for relocation.
I don't like bringing this to the attention of others, but not talking about it does not do it justice. These are the facts:
New Orleans is a small market by NFL standards, even before Katrina devastated the city. Most of those who lived in NO prior to the storm have relocated to Baton Rouge, many intend to stay. Baton Rouge is currently larger than NO, and by all analysts estimates, will remain permanently larger than NO. Baton Rouge absorbed not only many of the former citizens of NO, but many of the businesses have relocated as well. People and corporations are a major factor in the placement of NFL teams. Geographically speaking, BR is the most centrally located city in the state. The commisioner has adamently stated that he would like the Saints to remain in Louisiana, if possible. The commisioner also stated that the team needed to better regionalize itself, which could include renaming the team to better represent the state. If the team were to leave Louisiana, the prospects of receiving another team are slim, at best. A state of the art stadium, financed by Louisiana taxpayers, is one of the major sticking points on whether or not the Saints will remain in the state. Tiger stadium is indeed a state of the art facility already built and paid for by the taxpayers. All of these leads me to believe that the team and the fans would be better off if the team were to relocate to Baton Rouge permanently. Thank you for hearing me out. |
![]() |