RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - DRAFT HIM
 

If we take Leinart he'll know what Brokeback Moutain is all about, getting rapped by Defenses as our line is horrible and getting worse.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - DRAFT
 

So why can't we have both??? After we dump Brooks we'll have over 15 mil in cap room. We could aquire some good FA help for the defensive and offensive line, and still draft Leinart. There's a way everyone can be happy, unless you desperately want Brooks here still, in which case you're out of luck.

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

Bringing in a couple of FA is ok but you're not going to get veterans who are in there prime or tail end of their careers to come to a team with a unproven NFL QB that will take time to develop. We need major help on the lines before we should address the QB position. Build a OL and DL and it won't matter who you have at QB, DENVER, PITT, SEATTLE, CAROLINA... wait did I just mention the final four teams in the playoffs, damn.

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

No matter what the QB situation has to be addressed. I agree that the OL and DL are definite needs but QB is right there too. We have Brooks, who is finished here. We have Bouman who is a lifetime back up, and AMac who is a couple years away from contributing by all reports. I think we would have a harder time attracting FA's to come here and block for any of our QBs than for a rookie QB. We either need to get a QB through FA, like David Gerrard, or draft one, simple as that.

Denver, Pitt, Seattle, Carolina. You just named two teams with QBs picked in the top 15 picks in the draft. Hasselbeck and Delhomme also are bright QBs who make good decisions. None of our current QBs compare to them in the least.

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

actually i am the only JEDI master on this board

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

Ben went in the top 15. What other one? Plummer was a second round pick

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

Neither of the QBs you mention have lines and D like us... they wouldn't be in the playoffs if behind our line. Trading down is the best way to go. Hell draft a QB in later rounds but we have to address the lines first.

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

I'm really high on Jacobs. I think his stock will rise. I see him as a Leftwich clone. The big knock is the system he played in. Which is the same as Alex Smith did last year.

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - D
 

I agree Euphoria

Re: RE: Official change of stance on Leinart - DRAFT HIM!!!!
 

Oh, I have a name for you, but it does not include the words "Jedi", "Master", or "Supreme". :wink:

This is true. Pak is the official resident Jedi. :wink: