![]() |
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton interested in
I am going to start up my FanNJ fan club. LOL. Thanx Fan. I'm not saying we are joined at the hip but its good to see that someone understands what I am talking about.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton inter
LOLOL....like I said....IF I'm not mistaken...;0) Quick question though and I ask this cause I really don't remember....How many games did Blake play that season?
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton interested in
C'mon.
O.K., Cutler had a lack of talent at Vandy. He still didn't win. Tom Brady, during their 1st championship year, had a lack of talent as well. Their starting RB is now our 2nd-3rd stringer. He had receivers like Troy Brown & David Patten (hardly Pro Bowl material) & he won the Super Bowl. Brooks, who had far more talent on offense than Brady consistently killed his team. However, it is pointless to argue with you, because you are obviously hellbent on hating Leinart & defending Brooks. But ponder this: If Leinart was not that good, would the Jets be willing to give up John Abraham (a perrenial Pro-Bowler) & a sh**load of picks to move up to get him? |
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton interested in
Quote:
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton interested in
Quote:
OK lets make it easy for ya. Put Cutler of the same USC team and then make a comparison. Give the guy all day to throw to talented recievers and backs, and tight ends, and the numbers will jump off the chart, but we can't do that because he played at F ing Vandy. USC has 5 Players from offense that are potential first round picks. 5. This should have been a Wonderlink question:) |
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton interested in
FatiusJeebs, Blake started the first 11 games and had a record of 7-3.5 (he was injured the last game so I'm only crediting him with half that loss). Brooks finished the last five and had a record of 3-2 regular season and 1-1 playoffs.
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton interested in
Funny.....I really tried to keep Brooks out of this one but you guys are sooo hellbent on Lienart and the anti-Brooks movement that common sense has left the building for you guys. How could you say Brady had no talent? A. Smith was awesome during his younger years. Troy Brown has good hands. The defense was spectacular. Where do you get the idea that Brady had a bad squad? Or at least a squad not able to contend? No one here is saying that Lienart sux. Thuth is, however, the man has had the best of the best and he really doesn't know what pressure is. What we are saying is.. Cutler had crap and he made crap respectable. What could he possibly do if he had better or even the best crap? ;0) I know this arguement can go both ways but remember guys...I live in Miami. I am a big Hurricane fan. And I know for SURE that QB's that kick ass in college and win Heisman Trophies don't account for crap most of the time. Of all the QB's that UM had that were successful between 1980 and 2005 how many can you name that made a dent in the NFL? I can only think of 3. Kelly, Kosar, and Testaverde. What happened to Toretta? Kicked ass in college..Hiesman winner....SQUAT! How about Walsh? We all know that answer. HEY what about Ken Dorsey? So far...no news. So for all of you who feel that Lienart had great collegiate success...knows how to run a winning program and should do well in the NFL becuase of it....please be very very careful.
|
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton intereste
Quote:
|
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Payton intereste
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com