Abraham to the Falcons

BJSim · 03-21-2006, 08:18 PM

They (Denver) can still throw alot at GB or SF for their picks so they can get Cutler or Young whichever is still available. They still have the #15 and #22 to play with.

TheDeuce · 03-21-2006, 10:50 PM

I don't think Mangold is going to be there in the second round. I think that if we want to get him, we're going to have to trade down to the 24-32nd range...

BlackandBlue · 03-21-2006, 11:27 PM

both firsts, and the 3rd would be more in line. would be a 4th, but you gotta bump that given the talent.

LKelley67 · 03-21-2006, 11:33 PM

Just FYI
#2= 2600

#4+#29= 2440 off by 160

their 3rd #71= 235
and 4th #103= 88

take 4, 29, and 71 since we are missing a 3rd rd pick. Throw'em a 5th rd if need be
----
of cousre there is the 4th to 7th move after that. only 300 pts diff tho.
Raiders give #7 & #38 (2020pts) and we give them #4 & the acquired #71 (2035pts)
They throw in a 7th rd if need be
----
end result? basically move from to 2 to 7 and add #29 and #38
#7, 29, 34, 38 are the picks. i could see 3 starters as a result.

dulplay · 03-22-2006, 12:11 AM

Whew... looking at your post Kelley made me flash back to algebra class. I'd be happy getting both 1st and their 3rd. Starting off day two of the draft with a high pick, plenty of great players should be sitting right there. I like the Hawk/Winston combo the most but i am really high on Da Brick... especially since the Dirty Ass Birds have Kerney and Abraham to contend with now! But I have to admit, going to war with one year of experience between two tackles scares me a little.

03-22-2006, 12:11 AM	#25
dulplay Registered Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 62	Whew... looking at your post Kelley made me flash back to algebra class. I'd be happy getting both 1st and their 3rd. Starting off day two of the draft with a high pick, plenty of great players should be sitting right there. I like the Hawk/Winston combo the most but i am really high on Da Brick... especially since the Dirty Ass Birds have Kerney and Abraham to contend with now! But I have to admit, going to war with one year of experience between two tackles scares me a little.
dulplay Registered Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 62

03-21-2006, 08:18 PM	#21
BJSim 500+ posts Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Centreville, VA Posts: 577	They (Denver) can still throw alot at GB or SF for their picks so they can get Cutler or Young whichever is still available. They still have the #15 and #22 to play with.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-21-2006, 10:50 PM	#22
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	I don't think Mangold is going to be there in the second round. I think that if we want to get him, we're going to have to trade down to the 24-32nd range...
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

03-21-2006, 11:27 PM	#23
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	both firsts, and the 3rd would be more in line. would be a 4th, but you gotta bump that given the talent.

03-21-2006, 11:33 PM	#24
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	Just FYI #2= 2600 #4+#29= 2440 off by 160 their 3rd #71= 235 and 4th #103= 88 take 4, 29, and 71 since we are missing a 3rd rd pick. Throw'em a 5th rd if need be ---- of cousre there is the 4th to 7th move after that. only 300 pts diff tho. Raiders give #7 & #38 (2020pts) and we give them #4 & the acquired #71 (2035pts) They throw in a 7th rd if need be ---- end result? basically move from to 2 to 7 and add #29 and #38 #7, 29, 34, 38 are the picks. i could see 3 starters as a result.