|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Because you post rediculous numbers in half a season, does not make one an "impact", imo Who are you talking about?...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
But why would we get a guy who isn't going to be playing the whole time when we can draft a guy at a position of need who WILL play the entire game?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
500+ posts
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 577
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
Deuce, I'm not arguing your point. I agree that it wouldn't be the best player for us by need, but if we've got him, it's an upgrade to the possition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
I guess it would be an upgrade, but I really think that the tandem of Grant and Will is one of the best in the NFL. I know he's a good player, but why use your best pick to upgrade a position that's already the best on your team when you have holes at OT, OC, LB, DT, and CB; none of which Williams will fill...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
RE: Mario Williams Poll
grant is good, don't consider him to be "impact".
and again, i'm not advocating the pic. it is not what i would consider to be ideal. however, i would be happy with it. |
![]() |