03-30-2006, 11:33 AM
|
#31
|
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
I'M NOT SUPPORTING BROOKS
Brooks played good enough to take us but you can't win without at least a fair defense
The defense misses 20 plays a game and so we are forced to ask the QB to win the game despite the OL screwing up worse than Brooks.
YES YOU ARE. Holy crap, how dense can you be? You can't say, "I'm not supporting Brooks," and then go out and defend him. That's called supporting him. But it's not even that which is so annoying. This is:
I don't want to get in to an argument on Brooks's carreer because
THEN DON'T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't even bring him up because you know what's going to happen, especially when you're going to say CRAP like this:
Why can't you guy see that Brooks was an average QB on a crappy team that was in way over his head and asked to win too many games by himself.
Crappy team? THey went to the playoffs. Half of that season (the better half with the better record) was played with Jeff Blake, not AB. Deuce, Horn, Turley, Bentley, Glover, Roaf, Williams. Crappy? Squirrel please. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Lighten up guys... your anger will be your undoing.
Yet you go ahead and say:
You're contradictions are almost as disgusting as your blind support of Brooks despite the cold hard facts.
|
|
|
|