Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Charles Grant Trade

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Defensively, we would upgrade by getting Williams, a freak such as Peppers. So, how many sacks does Williams have next year, since you are able to see in the future? It was also said Kijana Carter was the next Eric ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2006, 03:26 PM   #21
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Defensively, we would upgrade by getting Williams, a freak such as Peppers.
So, how many sacks does Williams have next year, since you are able to see in the future? It was also said Kijana Carter was the next Eric Dickerson. We don't know what Williams is cause he hasn't played a down. He was also at best, average the two years prior to this last one. No way I throw Grant away for that.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 03:39 PM   #22
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by saintswhodi
Defensively, we would upgrade by getting Williams, a freak such as Peppers.
So, how many sacks does Williams have next year, since you are able to see in the future? It was also said Kijana Carter was the next Eric Dickerson. We don't know what Williams is cause he hasn't played a down. He was also at best, average the two years prior to this last one. No way I throw Grant away for that.
Like that avatar WhoDi.

I spent my lunch peering into the future and discerned that Williams will have 21 sacks next year.

I'm not sure that anyone is talking about throwing Grant away. (Or at least I'm not) If we take Williams, then we must get value for Grant. We cannot keep Grant on the roster entering a contract year if we take Williams. I'm not totally in love with Williams unless we get stuck at #2. At #2 Williams is probably the BPA (certainly open to debate, just my take).

At any rate, it doesn't seem crazy to me to get either a quality player or a 1st or 2nd round pick in exchange for Grant who can be a productive pass rusher.

.02 and the 21 sacks really impressed me.

BrooksMustGo is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 03:48 PM   #23
Nose Digger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 341
So, how many sacks does Williams have next year, since you are able to see in the future? It was also said Kijana Carter was the next Eric Dickerson. We don't know what Williams is cause he hasn't played a down. He was also at best, average the two years prior to this last one. No way I throw Grant away for that.
So, you must be a psychic then. How many sacks will Grant have next year? Your guess is as good as mine. You can sit the and say so and so is the next coming of who ever you want to choose. Charles Grant has been average at best.
Boogro is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:03 PM   #24
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,498
This trade doesn't make sense to me. By doing this trade we create another need on our team (DE) while not filling another (we don't need anymore wr's). Sure, Walker would be an upgrade at wr and Mario has so much upside, but lets just say we do this trade and take Mario at 2, we still have the same holes to fill and now we have to wait to the 2nd round to fill them. Grant/Smith is one of the better DE combos in the league, why create another hole on our team? Look to trade down with the jets, get their 2 first rounders and another pick in the middle of the draft and fill our needs on the o-line, dt, lb, and at corner.
LivnaLieTimay is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:21 PM   #25
100th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 269
it would just be dumb to thing mario would do any better the grant at de, this kids hasn't played a down in the nfl and he is already the next julis peppers, rather have a sloid already battle tested de then so a risking kid coming out of a weak football conference
NEXTPROBOWLER is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:24 PM   #26
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,737
Walker an elite player? Come on now that's a stretch... he had one good year and spent the year after that on IR. Pass.
papz is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:41 PM   #27
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,498
While I'm not in favor of Grant for Walker, hypothetically speaking, if Mario was our guy, I would say deal Grant. The trade I came up with was Grant and #2 to the Jets for their 2 first rounders, their 2nd round pick (more realistically their 3rd rounder), and the Jets first rounder next year. I don't know if the Jets would do this but what to you guys think? Note: Remember this is assuming our FO is stuck on Mario, I'm personally in favor of keeping Grant and Smith at DE and trading down for Hawk or Brick.
LivnaLieTimay is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:51 PM   #28
500th Post
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 594
Deja Vu all over again as the saying goes....

We don't know what the team has in store for Grant. However if they don't see him in the team's future next year, then it would behoove us to get something for him and learn from the Howard debacle. Howard was basically ineffective for this year we had him franchised and didn't want to be here. If they are getting this same vibe from Grant, then pull the trigger no doubt. Walker may or may not be a stud, but he's far better than letting someone walk for nothing again.
GoldRush26 is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:53 PM   #29
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 3,368
Blog Entries: 34
why trade a proven top 10 DE for anything less than someone of equal caliber. Walker certainly isn't a top 10 receiver, and Williams will take time to develop. I'm with everyone that thinks this is a profoundly stupid idea.
xan is offline  
Old 04-11-2006, 04:59 PM   #30
Problem?
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,737
Not to mention Walker wants a big fat contract extension... that's okay get it somewhere else.
papz is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts