McPherson being shopped?

papz · 06-16-2006, 07:46 PM

Might as well see what we can get for him... it's not like he's ever going to see the field... ever.

saintswhodi · 06-17-2006, 12:01 PM

Originally Posted by papz

Might as well see what we can get for him... it's not like he's ever going to see the field... ever.

Agreed there. They must be comfortable with Brees' recovery in order to be looking at trading him.

jnormand · 06-17-2006, 12:11 PM

I don't know who I would rather keep....Bouman or A-Mac. I wouldn't mind seeing what A-Mac can do, but if he is never going to see the field, than screw it.

mikesaintfan · 06-19-2006, 02:24 PM

Amac could be listed as a WR and brought in for trickery plays then fire the ball downfield after a reverse

BRSaintsFan · 06-25-2006, 05:31 PM

I think Amac could be the future QB down the line. If you get something worth it, then trade him but if not, then let Payton develop him and see what he can do. You cant deny the upside. Still will enver understand why last season we bench Brooks and play Bouman and not Amac. That was the time to give the guy a shot and see what he can do.

SaintFanInATLHELL · 06-26-2006, 06:37 PM

Originally Posted by BRSaintsFan

I think Amac could be the future QB down the line. If you get something worth it, then trade him but if not, then let Payton develop him and see what he can do. You cant deny the upside. Still will enver understand why last season we bench Brooks and play Bouman and not Amac. That was the time to give the guy a shot and see what he can do.

Definite co-sign on the last part. The season was lost. Playing AMac would have generated some interest and given him some valuable experience.

SFIAH

06-17-2006, 12:01 PM	#12
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	Originally Posted by papz Might as well see what we can get for him... it's not like he's ever going to see the field... ever. Agreed there. They must be comfortable with Brees' recovery in order to be looking at trading him.

06-26-2006, 06:37 PM	#16
SaintFanInATLHELL The Professor Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lithonia, GA Posts: 2,776	Originally Posted by BRSaintsFan I think Amac could be the future QB down the line. If you get something worth it, then trade him but if not, then let Payton develop him and see what he can do. You cant deny the upside. Still will enver understand why last season we bench Brooks and play Bouman and not Amac. That was the time to give the guy a shot and see what he can do. Definite co-sign on the last part. The season was lost. Playing AMac would have generated some interest and given him some valuable experience. SFIAH

06-16-2006, 07:46 PM	#11
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,754	Might as well see what we can get for him... it's not like he's ever going to see the field... ever.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

06-17-2006, 12:11 PM	#13
jnormand 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Free State of Idaho Posts: 5,687	I don't know who I would rather keep....Bouman or A-Mac. I wouldn't mind seeing what A-Mac can do, but if he is never going to see the field, than screw it.

06-19-2006, 02:24 PM	#14
mikesaintfan 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2006 Location: new jersey Posts: 1,070	Amac could be listed as a WR and brought in for trickery plays then fire the ball downfield after a reverse

06-25-2006, 05:31 PM	#15
BRSaintsFan 100th Post Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 449	I think Amac could be the future QB down the line. If you get something worth it, then trade him but if not, then let Payton develop him and see what he can do. You cant deny the upside. Still will enver understand why last season we bench Brooks and play Bouman and not Amac. That was the time to give the guy a shot and see what he can do.