Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

The Saints According to The Sporting News

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; NEW ORLEANS SAINTS New offense, new head coach, refurbished Superdome, and an even worse defense. That will be the greatest challenge for Sean Payton and the offense. How do they score 40 points a game to make up for this ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-24-2006, 02:56 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,367
The Saints According to The Sporting News

NEW ORLEANS SAINTS

New offense, new head coach, refurbished Superdome, and an even worse defense. That will be the greatest challenge for Sean Payton and the offense. How do they score 40 points a game to make up for this horrific unit? Drew Brees will benefit from talented set of playmakers including WRs Joe Horn and Donte' Stallworth, Deuce McAllister and, of course, Reggie Bush. Assuming all of those guys can stay healthy -- which is not a safe assumption. But I'm looking for positives here. The offensive line is very shaky after losing Gandy and G/C LeCharles Bentley. The one bright spot on the other side of the ball for the Saints is emerging DE Will Smith and incumbent Charles Grant. Outside of that, CB Mike McKenzie still is OK, but he can't make up for a horrible linebacker unit and a equally awful rest of the secondary.

Predicted Finish: 4-12, No Playoffs. After their bye week, they host Baltimore before traveling the road to Pittsburgh and Tampa, come home to host the Bengals and then go back on the road to Atlanta. The finish the year with games at Dallas and the Giants, around home games with Carolina and Washington. YIKES!


NFC South.....
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn...c.php?t=120339


8)

My Guardian Angel wears a hard hat.
TallySaint is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 03:02 PM   #2
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
I said way back we had one of, if not the otughest schedule in the league. Mainly cause our team is not that good, and outside of our dividion, we play prob the toughest AFC and NFC divisions. We get our easy games out the way early too. It's gonna be a long one.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 03:38 PM   #3
Sammich Lover
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 682
I thought losing teams were supppsed to have easy schedules the next year?
wheelman is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 03:43 PM   #4
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Originally Posted by wheelman
I thought losing teams were supppsed to have easy schedules the next year?
Schedules are made years in advance now, except for two games, and in those two games you play two last place teams, or whever your team ranked. We play SF and GB. Since we were last place, and they were last place. Cleveland just happens to be in the AFC North, and we play that divison. Those days of cream puff schedules for losing teams are gone, unless you luck out and have to play like the AFC South and the NFC West one season.
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 03:55 PM   #5
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,367
This is from years ago. Don't know if its been tweaked since....



NFL ANNOUNCES 2002-2009 SCHEDULE ROTATION

The NFL announced the regular-season scheduling rotation for the next eight seasons (2002 through 2009) under the realignment plan that will take effective this season.

The interconference and intraconference divisional matchups – comprising 14 of each season’s 16 regular-season games -- for the next eight seasons were determined following extensive analysis and discussion with NFL clubs. A key factor in deciding the initial schedules was the displacement of certain teams from their traditional divisions in the new alignment.

These eight season schedules will take each team through a cycle of games – home and away – against every other team in the league. In these eight seasons, every team will play every other team at least twice – once home and once away. After the 2009 season, a decision will be made on whether to continue with the same rotation or modify it.

“The new scheduling formula is one of the most positive aspects of realignment,� Commissioner PAUL TAGLIABUE said. “The new formula guarantees that NFL fans will see every team play each other on a regular, rotating basis. The formula will eliminate the many aberrations of the past in which teams either did not play for long periods of time or did not play in another team’s stadium for many years.�

In determining how to begin the divisional rotation in 2002, the displacement of teams from their old divisions in the new alignment was taken into account. Preference was given to scheduling games with former division rivals and other regional opponents for clubs realigned from otherwise intact divisions.

For example, in 2002 the new NFC West will play the AFC West to match Seattle with its old rivals from the AFC West (Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego). The NFC West also will play the NFC East in order to match Arizona with its old NFC East rivals (Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington).

Also in 2002, the AFC North and AFC South are matched so that Jacksonville and Tennessee will play their former rivals from the old AFC Central (Baltimore, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Pittsburgh). The NFC North and NFC South pairing in 2002 will give Tampa Bay games against its former NFC Central rivals (Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota).

Other regional 2002 matchups include Dallas visiting Houston in the Texans’ inaugural season (NFC East vs. AFC South) and San Francisco at Oakland (NFC West vs. AFC West).

Games matching other previous division rivals or regional rivals that could not be scheduled in 2002 were put into the rotation as early as possible. Indianapolis will play its former AFC East rivals (Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets) in 2003 with the AFC East-AFC South matchup. The New York Jets will host the New York Giants in 2003 when the AFC East plays the NFC East. San Francisco and St. Louis will meet their old NFC West rivals (Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans) in 2004 when the NFC West and NFC South meet.



The new scheduling format includes the following elements:

· There will be an increased common-opponent emphasis with every team in a division playing against 14 common opponents.

· All teams will play each other on a regular basis, home and away, for a more consistent presentation of attractive games, eliminating the many schedule aberrations of the past.

· Teams are guaranteed to play all nondivision opponents in their conference at least once every three years, and at home at least once every six years.

· Every AFC team will play every NFC team once every four years, and at home once every eight years.

· A team’s record from the previous year will have less of a bearing on its schedule, with only two (rather than four) opponents being based on the previous year’s standing. Thus, the so-called “easy� fifth-place schedules are eliminated.

· The division in which a team resides will be less of a factor in a team’s won-loss record with 10 of 16 games each year being against non-division teams.

Under the new scheduling formula, every team within a division will play 16 games as follows:

· Home and away against its three division opponents (6 games).

· The four teams from another division within its conference on a rotating three-year cycle (4 games).

· The four teams from a division in the other conference on a rotating four-year cycle (4 games).

· Two intraconference games based on the prior year’s standings (2 games). These games will match a first-place team against the first-place teams in the two same-conference divisions the team is not scheduled to play that season. The second-place, third-place, and fourth-place teams in a conference will be matched in the same way each year.

NOTE -- Following are past schedule aberrations that no longer will occur under the new formula:

· Oakland did not play in Pittsburgh from 1981 through 1999.

· Miami and Denver played once between 1983-1997 when Dan Marino and John Elway were in their primes.

· Green Bay and Washington did not play from 1989-2000 and have not played in Washington since 1979.

· Atlanta and the New York Giants did not play from 1989-1997.

· Pittsburgh and Kansas City have played five consecutive times in Kansas City.

· Green Bay played in Dallas four years in a row from 1993-96.

· Tampa Bay has never played in Buffalo.

My Guardian Angel wears a hard hat.
TallySaint is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 04:11 PM   #6
Breakin Records
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Deville, Louisiana
Posts: 2,167
Im not worried about the schedule.......... I think we can pull 7 wins.........
AllSaints is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 04:13 PM   #7
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,367
Im not worried about the schedule.......... I think we can pull 7 wins.........

I was gonna make a smart-arse comment on where they would have to pull them from.


Nevermind.
TallySaint is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 04:17 PM   #8
Breakin Records
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Deville, Louisiana
Posts: 2,167
out there a$$........ duh..........
AllSaints is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 04:43 PM   #9
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
Originally Posted by TallySaint
This is from years ago. Don't know if its been tweaked since....



NFL ANNOUNCES 2002-2009 SCHEDULE ROTATION

The NFL announced the regular-season scheduling rotation for the next eight seasons (2002 through 2009) under the realignment plan that will take effective this season.

The interconference and intraconference divisional matchups – comprising 14 of each season’s 16 regular-season games -- for the next eight seasons were determined following extensive analysis and discussion with NFL clubs. A key factor in deciding the initial schedules was the displacement of certain teams from their traditional divisions in the new alignment.

These eight season schedules will take each team through a cycle of games – home and away – against every other team in the league. In these eight seasons, every team will play every other team at least twice – once home and once away. After the 2009 season, a decision will be made on whether to continue with the same rotation or modify it.

“The new scheduling formula is one of the most positive aspects of realignment,� Commissioner PAUL TAGLIABUE said. “The new formula guarantees that NFL fans will see every team play each other on a regular, rotating basis. The formula will eliminate the many aberrations of the past in which teams either did not play for long periods of time or did not play in another team’s stadium for many years.�

In determining how to begin the divisional rotation in 2002, the displacement of teams from their old divisions in the new alignment was taken into account. Preference was given to scheduling games with former division rivals and other regional opponents for clubs realigned from otherwise intact divisions.

For example, in 2002 the new NFC West will play the AFC West to match Seattle with its old rivals from the AFC West (Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego). The NFC West also will play the NFC East in order to match Arizona with its old NFC East rivals (Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington).

Also in 2002, the AFC North and AFC South are matched so that Jacksonville and Tennessee will play their former rivals from the old AFC Central (Baltimore, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Pittsburgh). The NFC North and NFC South pairing in 2002 will give Tampa Bay games against its former NFC Central rivals (Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota).

Other regional 2002 matchups include Dallas visiting Houston in the Texans’ inaugural season (NFC East vs. AFC South) and San Francisco at Oakland (NFC West vs. AFC West).

Games matching other previous division rivals or regional rivals that could not be scheduled in 2002 were put into the rotation as early as possible. Indianapolis will play its former AFC East rivals (Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets) in 2003 with the AFC East-AFC South matchup. The New York Jets will host the New York Giants in 2003 when the AFC East plays the NFC East. San Francisco and St. Louis will meet their old NFC West rivals (Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans) in 2004 when the NFC West and NFC South meet.



The new scheduling format includes the following elements:

· There will be an increased common-opponent emphasis with every team in a division playing against 14 common opponents.

· All teams will play each other on a regular basis, home and away, for a more consistent presentation of attractive games, eliminating the many schedule aberrations of the past.

· Teams are guaranteed to play all nondivision opponents in their conference at least once every three years, and at home at least once every six years.

· Every AFC team will play every NFC team once every four years, and at home once every eight years.

· A team’s record from the previous year will have less of a bearing on its schedule, with only two (rather than four) opponents being based on the previous year’s standing. Thus, the so-called “easy� fifth-place schedules are eliminated.

· The division in which a team resides will be less of a factor in a team’s won-loss record with 10 of 16 games each year being against non-division teams.

Under the new scheduling formula, every team within a division will play 16 games as follows:

· Home and away against its three division opponents (6 games).

· The four teams from another division within its conference on a rotating three-year cycle (4 games).

· The four teams from a division in the other conference on a rotating four-year cycle (4 games).

· Two intraconference games based on the prior year’s standings (2 games). These games will match a first-place team against the first-place teams in the two same-conference divisions the team is not scheduled to play that season. The second-place, third-place, and fourth-place teams in a conference will be matched in the same way each year.

NOTE -- Following are past schedule aberrations that no longer will occur under the new formula:

· Oakland did not play in Pittsburgh from 1981 through 1999.

· Miami and Denver played once between 1983-1997 when Dan Marino and John Elway were in their primes.

· Green Bay and Washington did not play from 1989-2000 and have not played in Washington since 1979.

· Atlanta and the New York Giants did not play from 1989-1997.

· Pittsburgh and Kansas City have played five consecutive times in Kansas City.

· Green Bay played in Dallas four years in a row from 1993-96.

· Tampa Bay has never played in Buffalo.
So exactly what I said, but a much longer version. :P
saintswhodi is offline  
Old 08-24-2006, 06:17 PM   #10
xan
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Princeton
Posts: 3,368
Blog Entries: 34
So how do we play NYG at the Meadowlands in consecutive years? Are they truly considering last year a home game? Sometimes I think the NFL is just a bunch of turds because of this type of thing.
xan is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts