My early list of the 22 starters, in 2007.

gandhi1007 · 01-26-2007, 08:51 AM

Originally Posted by D24pick

Originally Posted by gandhi1007

I don't know if I'm pencilling in Bullocks just yet. He's lost in coverage, misses assignments regularly, & doesn't tackle worth a damn! Trading Deuce would be a mistake, too....a big one. Two backs are better than one. I do like the idea of Danny Clark starting next year though. Every time he was in the game, the guy made a play.

I'm sorry why are you taking it out on Bullocks when we play man to man! Leaving him in the box only for Thomas to get burned by a length of a full railroad! Hell with these people blaming it all on Bullocks, "OH missed assignments this, OH uts not all Thomas' fault". Yes it is! We play MAN TO MAN, this guy is a safety in the box leaving all the way out just to try to make-up for Thomas' let-downs.

I can't beleive this guy can't tackle in your eyues, that's one of the things you can't ever say abput this guy. He's pretty much a sure tackler who doesn't go for the big hits all the time and plays strong, you must have the wrong guy.

Dude....don't let your man-crush on Bullocks get in the way of reality. How many times have wideouts simply brushed away his poor tackling & went on to the house this year? How many times has he bit on play action & looked lost out there? How many RB's have flat out run over his a**? Believe me....I'm not absolving Fred Thomas for his sorry excuse for play all season. He flat out got torched. Hell...the only time Freddie made a play is when he yawned while running with his man & accidentally tipped the ball in mid yawn. But....Bullocks looked horrible this season as well. No excuses for either one of these plugs, please.

Bobaganoosh · 01-26-2007, 08:16 PM

Originally Posted by pakowitz

like I stated already... stinchcomb is a Restricted Free Agent which means if any team signs him and we dont match then we get their 2nd round pick in exchange

I am going to respectfully disagree with that. I think after you have played 4 years, you are unrestricted. I am not 100% sure, but i would bet that Stinchcomb is unrestricted.

frankeefrank · 01-27-2007, 12:58 AM

i see charles grant getting more money elsewhere and rob nincovivh starting next year

plus I don't think Joe Horn will take a pay cut ot be our no. 3 WR.

frankeefrank · 01-27-2007, 01:00 AM

plus if we draft a defensive back in the first round this year i think i will wet myself.
Payton will once again prove he can do no wrong.
since, we've needed help in the secondary since the reagen administration

D24pick · 01-27-2007, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by gandhi1007

Originally Posted by D24pick

Originally Posted by gandhi1007

I don't know if I'm pencilling in Bullocks just yet. He's lost in coverage, misses assignments regularly, & doesn't tackle worth a damn! Trading Deuce would be a mistake, too....a big one. Two backs are better than one. I do like the idea of Danny Clark starting next year though. Every time he was in the game, the guy made a play.

I'm sorry why are you taking it out on Bullocks when we play man to man! Leaving him in the box only for Thomas to get burned by a length of a full railroad! Hell with these people blaming it all on Bullocks, "OH missed assignments this, OH uts not all Thomas' fault". Yes it is! We play MAN TO MAN, this guy is a safety in the box leaving all the way out just to try to make-up for Thomas' let-downs.

I can't beleive this guy can't tackle in your eyues, that's one of the things you can't ever say abput this guy. He's pretty much a sure tackler who doesn't go for the big hits all the time and plays strong, you must have the wrong guy.

Dude....don't let your man-crush on Bullocks get in the way of reality. How many times have wideouts simply brushed away his poor tackling & went on to the house this year? How many times has he bit on play action & looked lost out there? How many RB's have flat out run over his a**? Believe me....I'm not absolving Fred Thomas for his sorry excuse for play all season. He flat out got torched. Hell...the only time Freddie made a play is when he yawned while running with his man & accidentally tipped the ball in mid yawn. But....Bullocks looked horrible this season as well. No excuses for either one of these plugs, please.

Now that's the Ghandi I like to see, totally agree. I'd like to give em one more yr, he can tackle like a p**** sometimes, maybe a lack of confidence or something

01-26-2007, 08:51 AM	#11
gandhi1007 Part Time Pimp Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,967	Re: RE: My early list of the 22 starters, in 2007. Originally Posted by D24pick Originally Posted by gandhi1007 I don't know if I'm pencilling in Bullocks just yet. He's lost in coverage, misses assignments regularly, & doesn't tackle worth a damn! Trading Deuce would be a mistake, too....a big one. Two backs are better than one. I do like the idea of Danny Clark starting next year though. Every time he was in the game, the guy made a play. I'm sorry why are you taking it out on Bullocks when we play man to man! Leaving him in the box only for Thomas to get burned by a length of a full railroad! Hell with these people blaming it all on Bullocks, "OH missed assignments this, OH uts not all Thomas' fault". Yes it is! We play MAN TO MAN, this guy is a safety in the box leaving all the way out just to try to make-up for Thomas' let-downs. I can't beleive this guy can't tackle in your eyues, that's one of the things you can't ever say abput this guy. He's pretty much a sure tackler who doesn't go for the big hits all the time and plays strong, you must have the wrong guy. Dude....don't let your man-crush on Bullocks get in the way of reality. How many times have wideouts simply brushed away his poor tackling & went on to the house this year? How many times has he bit on play action & looked lost out there? How many RB's have flat out run over his a**? Believe me....I'm not absolving Fred Thomas for his sorry excuse for play all season. He flat out got torched. Hell...the only time Freddie made a play is when he yawned while running with his man & accidentally tipped the ball in mid yawn. But....Bullocks looked horrible this season as well. No excuses for either one of these plugs, please.
	http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g2...gs/12-3006.jpg ______________________________ KNOWING IS HALF THE BATTLE! -G.I. Joe

01-26-2007, 08:16 PM	#12
Bobaganoosh PorkchopExpress Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 608 Blog Entries: 2	Re: RE: Re: My early list of the 22 starters, in 2007. Originally Posted by pakowitz like I stated already... stinchcomb is a Restricted Free Agent which means if any team signs him and we dont match then we get their 2nd round pick in exchange I am going to respectfully disagree with that. I think after you have played 4 years, you are unrestricted. I am not 100% sure, but i would bet that Stinchcomb is unrestricted.

01-27-2007, 12:58 AM	#13
frankeefrank 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 775	RE: Re: RE: Re: My early list of the 22 starters, in 2007. i see charles grant getting more money elsewhere and rob nincovivh starting next year plus I don't think Joe Horn will take a pay cut ot be our no. 3 WR.
frankeefrank 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 775

01-27-2007, 01:00 AM	#14
frankeefrank 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 775	RE: Re: RE: Re: My early list of the 22 starters, in 2007. plus if we draft a defensive back in the first round this year i think i will wet myself. Payton will once again prove he can do no wrong. since, we've needed help in the secondary since the reagen administration
frankeefrank 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 775

01-27-2007, 03:33 PM	#15
D24pick 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: New Orleans Posts: 578	Re: RE: My early list of the 22 starters, in 2007. Originally Posted by gandhi1007 Originally Posted by D24pick Originally Posted by gandhi1007 I don't know if I'm pencilling in Bullocks just yet. He's lost in coverage, misses assignments regularly, & doesn't tackle worth a damn! Trading Deuce would be a mistake, too....a big one. Two backs are better than one. I do like the idea of Danny Clark starting next year though. Every time he was in the game, the guy made a play. I'm sorry why are you taking it out on Bullocks when we play man to man! Leaving him in the box only for Thomas to get burned by a length of a full railroad! Hell with these people blaming it all on Bullocks, "OH missed assignments this, OH uts not all Thomas' fault". Yes it is! We play MAN TO MAN, this guy is a safety in the box leaving all the way out just to try to make-up for Thomas' let-downs. I can't beleive this guy can't tackle in your eyues, that's one of the things you can't ever say abput this guy. He's pretty much a sure tackler who doesn't go for the big hits all the time and plays strong, you must have the wrong guy. Dude....don't let your man-crush on Bullocks get in the way of reality. How many times have wideouts simply brushed away his poor tackling & went on to the house this year? How many times has he bit on play action & looked lost out there? How many RB's have flat out run over his a? Believe me....I'm not absolving Fred Thomas for his sorry excuse for play all season. He flat out got torched. Hell...the only time Freddie made a play is when he yawned while running with his man & accidentally tipped the ball in mid yawn. But....Bullocks looked horrible this season as well. No excuses for either one of these plugs, please. Now that's the Ghandi I like to see, totally agree. I'd like to give em one more yr, he can tackle like a p** sometimes, maybe a lack of confidence or something
	http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q...gle5/art24.png

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey