My FA shopping list

biloxi-indian · 02-18-2007, 10:52 AM

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL

Originally Posted by blacksaint

Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST.

Too old and wants too much money.

If you're going to spend serious money at the MLB position, get a young guy in there.

I still don't know what's the deal with Danny Clark. We have the guy on staff and he's a stud. I just can't figure out why Gibbs wouldn't put him on the field full time.

SFIAH

SFIAH, I posted the folllowing previously; I followed up on the stats of Edwards, Clark, and Briggs and here are the findings for the last four years (2003 stats are first);

Edwards, last four years with the Chargers;
Tackles 122, 112, 104, 97
Assists 39, 46, 40, 44
Sacks .5, 1, 3, 2.5
Int 2, 5, 2, 3

Clark, one year with the Jags, two years with Raiders, and one with the Saints;
Tackles 29, 98, 82, 23
Assists 11, 31, 31 6
Sacks 0, 2, 1, 0
Int 0, 0 ,0 ,0

Briggs, last four years with Bears;
Tackles 65, 102, 83, 109
Assists 13, 24, 24, 21
Sacks 0, .5, 2, 1
Int 1, 1, 2, 2

Clark is three years older than Briggs and three years younger than Edwards.

I think the stats speak for themselves as to performance on the field. I like Clark, but he ain't no Edwards when it comes to production and performance. Maybe the reason Clark wasn't on the field more...good run stuffer by lacks cover skills.

02-18-2007, 10:52 AM	#1
biloxi-indian Site Donor Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Southlake, TX Posts: 1,706	Re: RE: Re: RE: My FA shopping list Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL Originally Posted by blacksaint Yo, any of you guys ever hear of a LB by the name of Donnie Edwards. Don't be surprised if he's in the starting lineup. That boy is a BEAST. Too old and wants too much money. If you're going to spend serious money at the MLB position, get a young guy in there. I still don't know what's the deal with Danny Clark. We have the guy on staff and he's a stud. I just can't figure out why Gibbs wouldn't put him on the field full time. SFIAH SFIAH, I posted the folllowing previously; I followed up on the stats of Edwards, Clark, and Briggs and here are the findings for the last four years (2003 stats are first); Edwards, last four years with the Chargers; Tackles 122, 112, 104, 97 Assists 39, 46, 40, 44 Sacks .5, 1, 3, 2.5 Int 2, 5, 2, 3 Clark, one year with the Jags, two years with Raiders, and one with the Saints; Tackles 29, 98, 82, 23 Assists 11, 31, 31 6 Sacks 0, 2, 1, 0 Int 0, 0 ,0 ,0 Briggs, last four years with Bears; Tackles 65, 102, 83, 109 Assists 13, 24, 24, 21 Sacks 0, .5, 2, 1 Int 1, 1, 2, 2 Clark is three years older than Briggs and three years younger than Edwards. I think the stats speak for themselves as to performance on the field. I like Clark, but he ain't no Edwards when it comes to production and performance. Maybe the reason Clark wasn't on the field more...good run stuffer by lacks cover skills.
	Insanity is defined as doing the same thing over, over, and over again...and expecting a different outcome!