LBs

D_it_up · 04-29-2007, 01:19 PM

And LB is NOT a glaring need

TheDeuce · 04-29-2007, 01:29 PM

Originally Posted by D_it_up2

And LB is NOT a glaring need

It's not? You seriously think Scott Shanle is the answer? I don't. Compared to every other position on this team, only defensive tackle is a more pressing need in my eyes. We could have used a guy like Posluszny.

D_it_up · 04-29-2007, 01:36 PM

If you had read a post I made earlier, you would have seen exactly what I said about our LB corps. It's not great, but it is deep. That is why it isn't a glaring need. A starting DT and depth at DE behind Smith and Grant are more pressing IMO than LB. I'm not at all worried about our LB's. First time I can honestly say that in a quite a while.

TheDeuce · 04-29-2007, 01:58 PM

Originally Posted by D_it_up2

If you had read a post I made earlier, you would have seen exactly what I said about our LB corps. It's not great, but it is deep. That is why it isn't a glaring need. A starting DT and depth at DE behind Smith and Grant are more pressing IMO than LB. I'm not at all worried about our LB's. First time I can honestly say that in a quite a while.

I'm not arguing against the offensive line picks, because I do think that Brees needs protection, and you can never go wrong with OLine depth. But drafting a Pittman and mutliple corners is just misguided in my opinion, especially considering we just signed Jason David to handle the other corner opposite MM. I'm just saying that having depth at LB is nice, but we could have had a stud in Posluszny. Right now we have a bunch of guys who can play, but nobody really who stands out. I think we need a playmaker at the linebacker spot, a guy who can change the game, and we just don't have one right now. Just my opinion, you don't have to agree with it, but I'm just not convinced Scott Shanle can provide what we need out of the linebacking position.

hagan714 · 04-29-2007, 02:16 PM

Passed up some good talent. but we have so much depth at OL now I am happy for the next couple of years. look at the street FA added and the draft, man o man. I can not wait to see what we pick up in UDFA after this. We got some nice DT on the practice squad too, that are playing in europe. I think all the money spent in the off season on the D held us back abit. As for LB we got round 7 still. Alot of the odd balls on my chart are falling now. god knows what will be left. Do not rule out something happening before the season starts to.

ScottF · 04-29-2007, 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by hagan714

Alot of the odd balls on my chart are falling now. god knows what will be left. Do not rule out something happening before the season starts to.

Pittman (LSU) and Patrick finally went. Surprised by Lua- didn't even start last year.

I hope we go D-line here.....

ssmitty · 04-29-2007, 02:27 PM

chicago had the two best linebackers in the superbowl.......
payton was trying to get us to the superbowl and fell to chicago....
chicago goes over and over in my mind.........what did we not have to beat em? was it luck? some..........our recieving corps, our running backs, our kicking team, our corners, our dts, what else..............how did payton m. do it? he took what they gave him and fed it back to em..........
who out there says we wont be back barring injury to brees? and do we look better than last time? i'd be surprised if we're not..........superbowl, the saints are coming....................smitty

hagan714 · 04-29-2007, 03:22 PM

Simpson, Juwan 6-2 225 Alabama
Johnson, Rory 6-1 237 Mississippi
Shotwell, Kyle 6-1 237 Cal Poly
Holloway, David 6-2 229 Maryland
Muncy, Matt 6-1 242 Ohio
Nkang, Chad 5-11 220 Elon
Taylor, Tony 6-0 236 Georgia
Zalewski, Mark 6-2 234 Wisconsin

Are still on the board so there is hope for you.

ScottyRo · 04-29-2007, 03:42 PM

The LB we got wasn't on your list.

ScottyRo · 04-29-2007, 07:59 PM

Originally Posted by TheDeuce

But drafting a Pittman and mutliple corners is just misguided in my opinion...

Saints | Pittman added to crowded backfield
Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:23:23 -0700

Associated Press reports the New Orleans Saints added another running back to their stable Sunday, April 29, with the selection of RB Antonio Pittman, formerly of Ohio State. He is expected to compete for the No. 3 running back job with RB Aaron Stecker. Pittman said he was shocked with the Saints selecting him because he never worked out for them before the NFL Draft.
From KFFL

I, too, am wondering why Pittman. I guess we'll see. From the bios I've seen on him I don't think the rumors that we get rid of Deuce next year are reasonable. Not because we have Pittman anyway.

04-29-2007, 01:29 PM	#2
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Originally Posted by D_it_up2 And LB is NOT a glaring need It's not? You seriously think Scott Shanle is the answer? I don't. Compared to every other position on this team, only defensive tackle is a more pressing need in my eyes. We could have used a guy like Posluszny.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

04-29-2007, 01:58 PM	#4
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Originally Posted by D_it_up2 If you had read a post I made earlier, you would have seen exactly what I said about our LB corps. It's not great, but it is deep. That is why it isn't a glaring need. A starting DT and depth at DE behind Smith and Grant are more pressing IMO than LB. I'm not at all worried about our LB's. First time I can honestly say that in a quite a while. I'm not arguing against the offensive line picks, because I do think that Brees needs protection, and you can never go wrong with OLine depth. But drafting a Pittman and mutliple corners is just misguided in my opinion, especially considering we just signed Jason David to handle the other corner opposite MM. I'm just saying that having depth at LB is nice, but we could have had a stud in Posluszny. Right now we have a bunch of guys who can play, but nobody really who stands out. I think we need a playmaker at the linebacker spot, a guy who can change the game, and we just don't have one right now. Just my opinion, you don't have to agree with it, but I'm just not convinced Scott Shanle can provide what we need out of the linebacking position.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

04-29-2007, 02:16 PM	#5
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Passed up some good talent. but we have so much depth at OL now I am happy for the next couple of years. look at the street FA added and the draft, man o man. I can not wait to see what we pick up in UDFA after this. We got some nice DT on the practice squad too, that are playing in europe. I think all the money spent in the off season on the D held us back abit. As for LB we got round 7 still. Alot of the odd balls on my chart are falling now. god knows what will be left. Do not rule out something happening before the season starts to.
	"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins

04-29-2007, 03:36 PM	#6
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Originally Posted by hagan714 Alot of the odd balls on my chart are falling now. god knows what will be left. Do not rule out something happening before the season starts to. Pittman (LSU) and Patrick finally went. Surprised by Lua- didn't even start last year. I hope we go D-line here.....

04-29-2007, 02:27 PM	#7
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879	chicago had the two best linebackers in the superbowl....... payton was trying to get us to the superbowl and fell to chicago.... chicago goes over and over in my mind.........what did we not have to beat em? was it luck? some..........our recieving corps, our running backs, our kicking team, our corners, our dts, what else..............how did payton m. do it? he took what they gave him and fed it back to em.......... who out there says we wont be back barring injury to brees? and do we look better than last time? i'd be surprised if we're not..........superbowl, the saints are coming....................smitty
ssmitty 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,879

04-29-2007, 01:19 PM	#1
D_it_up Faqda Falcons Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Ruston, Louisiana Posts: 3,465 Blog Entries: 3	And LB is NOT a glaring need

04-29-2007, 01:36 PM	#3
D_it_up Faqda Falcons Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Ruston, Louisiana Posts: 3,465 Blog Entries: 3	If you had read a post I made earlier, you would have seen exactly what I said about our LB corps. It's not great, but it is deep. That is why it isn't a glaring need. A starting DT and depth at DE behind Smith and Grant are more pressing IMO than LB. I'm not at all worried about our LB's. First time I can honestly say that in a quite a while.

04-29-2007, 03:22 PM	#8
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Simpson, Juwan 6-2 225 Alabama Johnson, Rory 6-1 237 Mississippi Shotwell, Kyle 6-1 237 Cal Poly Holloway, David 6-2 229 Maryland Muncy, Matt 6-1 242 Ohio Nkang, Chad 5-11 220 Elon Taylor, Tony 6-0 236 Georgia Zalewski, Mark 6-2 234 Wisconsin Are still on the board so there is hope for you.

04-29-2007, 03:42 PM	#9
ScottyRo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here) Posts: 1,704	The LB we got wasn't on your list.

04-29-2007, 07:59 PM	#10
ScottyRo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here) Posts: 1,704	Originally Posted by TheDeuce But drafting a Pittman and mutliple corners is just misguided in my opinion... Saints \| Pittman added to crowded backfield Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:23:23 -0700 Associated Press reports the New Orleans Saints added another running back to their stable Sunday, April 29, with the selection of RB Antonio Pittman, formerly of Ohio State. He is expected to compete for the No. 3 running back job with RB Aaron Stecker. Pittman said he was shocked with the Saints selecting him because he never worked out for them before the NFL Draft. From KFFL I, too, am wondering why Pittman. I guess we'll see. From the bios I've seen on him I don't think the rumors that we get rid of Deuce next year are reasonable. Not because we have Pittman anyway.