Trotter works out for Bucs

Tobias-Reiper · 08-26-2007, 06:06 AM

Originally Posted by blacksaint

I don't think you can call numbers like these "diddley poo". The Redskins was just a bad team all around, but Jeremy Trotter was very productive. When he left the Eagles the first time it was dealing more with money and a lack of respect thing, I don't think they release him, Ithink he left on his own.

TEAR______TEAM_________G GS Total Solo Ast Sck PDef Int Yds Avg Lng
2003 Washington Redskins_16_16_113__90__23_1.5_10___1__21_21.0_21
2002 Washington Redskins_12_12__91__59__32_0.0__3___1___2__2.0__2

The numbers don't tell you the truth. I kinda follow the Redskins because I lived in the District for some years, and Trotter was a non factor the 2 years he was with the team. Could've been the scheme, sure, but he did not look good out there.

08-26-2007, 06:06 AM	#4
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: Trotter works out for Bucs Originally Posted by blacksaint I don't think you can call numbers like these "diddley poo". The Redskins was just a bad team all around, but Jeremy Trotter was very productive. When he left the Eagles the first time it was dealing more with money and a lack of respect thing, I don't think they release him, Ithink he left on his own. TEAR______TEAM_________G GS Total Solo Ast Sck PDef Int Yds Avg Lng 2003 Washington Redskins_16_16_113__90__23_1.5_10___1__21_21.0_21 2002 Washington Redskins_12_12__91__59__32_0.0__3___1___2__2.0__2 The numbers don't tell you the truth. I kinda follow the Redskins because I lived in the District for some years, and Trotter was a non factor the 2 years he was with the team. Could've been the scheme, sure, but he did not look good out there.