Trotter works out for Bucs

Tobias-Reiper · 08-26-2007, 06:06 AM

Originally Posted by blacksaint

I don't think you can call numbers like these "diddley poo". The Redskins was just a bad team all around, but Jeremy Trotter was very productive. When he left the Eagles the first time it was dealing more with money and a lack of respect thing, I don't think they release him, Ithink he left on his own.

TEAR______TEAM_________G GS Total Solo Ast Sck PDef Int Yds Avg Lng
2003 Washington Redskins_16_16_113__90__23_1.5_10___1__21_21.0_21
2002 Washington Redskins_12_12__91__59__32_0.0__3___1___2__2.0__2

The numbers don't tell you the truth. I kinda follow the Redskins because I lived in the District for some years, and Trotter was a non factor the 2 years he was with the team. Could've been the scheme, sure, but he did not look good out there.

08-26-2007, 06:06 AM	#4
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: Trotter works out for Bucs Originally Posted by blacksaint I don't think you can call numbers like these "diddley poo". The Redskins was just a bad team all around, but Jeremy Trotter was very productive. When he left the Eagles the first time it was dealing more with money and a lack of respect thing, I don't think they release him, Ithink he left on his own. TEAR______TEAM_________G GS Total Solo Ast Sck PDef Int Yds Avg Lng 2003 Washington Redskins_16_16_113__90__23_1.5_10___1__21_21.0_21 2002 Washington Redskins_12_12__91__59__32_0.0__3___1___2__2.0__2 The numbers don't tell you the truth. I kinda follow the Redskins because I lived in the District for some years, and Trotter was a non factor the 2 years he was with the team. Could've been the scheme, sure, but he did not look good out there.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode