concern at the wide reciever position?!?!?!

cadilacin · 09-09-2007, 11:59 AM

Originally Posted by Euphoria

You should never draft a WR unless you expect to give him the time to develop. Typically yes 3-4 years it takes. You like Henderson??? He cracks the line-up and a starter in the 4th year.

Other positions its a lot easier for some to develop a lot faster but WR is one of the most difficult.

He does show promise so there is no way I would put him in the bust category just yet.

All true. But when you have the #1 offense in the league and the worst run defense in the league, and bad cornerback play, and your receivers seem to be inter-changeable, the last thing you need to draft #1 is a receiver. We need LBs CB, DL, and OL. WE DIDN'T NEED HIM, and he's not going to be able to contribute while Deuce is in his prime. I hated that pick. And it looks even worse now. Great job Sean.

09-09-2007, 11:59 AM	#12
cadilacin "Real Talk" Join Date: May 2007 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 148	Re: concern at the wide reciever position?!?!?! Originally Posted by Euphoria You should never draft a WR unless you expect to give him the time to develop. Typically yes 3-4 years it takes. You like Henderson??? He cracks the line-up and a starter in the 4th year. Other positions its a lot easier for some to develop a lot faster but WR is one of the most difficult. He does show promise so there is no way I would put him in the bust category just yet. All true. But when you have the #1 offense in the league and the worst run defense in the league, and bad cornerback play, and your receivers seem to be inter-changeable, the last thing you need to draft #1 is a receiver. We need LBs CB, DL, and OL. WE DIDN'T NEED HIM, and he's not going to be able to contribute while Deuce is in his prime. I hated that pick. And it looks even worse now. Great job Sean.