|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'm sorry if someone already addressed this, but why did we go for 2 instead of the PAT? If we make the PAT, we are up by more than a field goal and less than a TD+PAT. If we make ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-22-2007, 08:34 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 737
|
2-Point Conversion
I'm sorry if someone already addressed this, but why did we go for 2 instead of the PAT? If we make the PAT, we are up by more than a field goal and less than a TD+PAT. If we make the 2-point conversion, we are still up by more than a field goal but less than a TD+PAT. Do we have that little faith in Mare?
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-22-2007, 08:37 AM | #2 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,773
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
Originally Posted by mjf150
It was totally crazy. I think the coaching staff simply couldn't add properly.
SFIAH |
10-22-2007, 09:11 AM | #3 |
100th Post
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 154
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
I didn't understand it either... but my best guess is that if they got 2 field goals we would still be tied.
But remember, I deal in reality and not the NFL. |
10-22-2007, 09:39 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 737
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
I'm glad to see that I wasn't the only one who thought it was a little odd.
|
10-22-2007, 09:49 AM | #5 |
Team Doctor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Deep South
Posts: 856
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
Originally Posted by mjf150
There is little difference between 4 and 5 points. On the otherhand, 6 points protects against two field goals which is still a possibility with as much time as there was. The 2 was a good call.
|
10-22-2007, 10:50 AM | #6 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: on the road - now based in Austin, TX
Posts: 480
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
I was busy adding crazy scenarios too - including a saftey - but then I thought it had to come down to Mare.
That makes me nervous. |
10-22-2007, 12:24 PM | #7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,985
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
Odd call yes, Reggie came up HUGE !!!!
|
10-22-2007, 02:00 PM | #8 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
Mental game....
up by 4, 5 or 6, anyway a TD still ties you/beats you. However, up by 4 or 5, two field goals beat you. It is easier to defend against a TD than it is to defend against a FG, and it is much easier to score a FG than score a TD. The Falcons have a really good kicker. The Falcons had been moving the ball , but stunk in the red zone. Mentally, down by 5, knowing they need to score 2 field goals, they could feel the game is within reach, since they've been moving the ball well outsidet he red zone, whereas they know they stink in the red zone and it makes it a much bigger task in their minds. |
'Cause the simple man pays the thrills, the bills and the pills that kill
|
|
10-22-2007, 02:20 PM | #9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,627
|
Re: 2-Point Conversion
I think it was a good call. If you don't convert it, you're still winning. But if you do convert it, you can withstand the following FG and onside kick (if the Falcons recover it).
Saints 2pt conversion kickoff to Falcons Falcons move ball -----------------> FG Falcons recover onside kick, move ball a mere 10 yards -----------> FG Chances are they win. But since we have those 2 points in our backpocket - they only tie us. Good call Payton. |