lets go back to 2006

JOESAM2002 · 11-25-2007, 08:08 AM

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL

Houston passed on Bush because they believed that he wouldn't work within the salary framework they were looking for. They thought it would be become a J Russel type situation.

Bush really isn't the problem. He's worked well in the year and a half thay he's been here.

Trading the pick would have been foolish from a PR standpoint. Trading the pick if Bush had been picked first may have worked. But it's been nearly two years later and Houston is still being panned for picking Williams.

At the time the Saints needed more than a football player (or two or three). They needed an icon to rally around. Bush has filled that role admirably.

I posit that if the Saints had not picked Bush and done well last year, they would not in fact still be in the region. That's how important picking Bush was.

SFIAH

Not picking Reggie would have been a marketing disaster. He has contributed to the play of this team last year and this year. I don't think he's been used right this year but I'm not the coach either. Reggie was difinitly the right pick for the Saints last year. Tradin g him for picks would have given us more players but how do we know they would have worked out? We don't. Anyway, I agree with SFIAH Reggie was the pick.

dasaints26 · 11-25-2007, 10:51 AM

How has the 2006 draft worked out? Lets see we go from 3-13 to 10-6. I would have to say that worked out pretty good. Going from 3-13 to a 1st round bye in the playoffs that is a good turnaround in 1 year. Having the 2nd pick in the draft and getting the best player in the draft is a good deal. How about that draft making it to the divisional championship game for the 1st time in franchise history?
No matter who is chosen in our draft some people will say it was a good choice and others will say we had bigger needs in other areas or the other side of the ball. It is also very easy to judge the talent a year or two later after we get to watch them play. The coaches dont have that luxury they have to make a choice on what the scouts tell them and take a chance that the player lives up to the potential.

11-25-2007, 08:08 AM	#11
JOESAM2002 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS Posts: 4,100	Re: lets go back to 2006 Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL Houston passed on Bush because they believed that he wouldn't work within the salary framework they were looking for. They thought it would be become a J Russel type situation. Bush really isn't the problem. He's worked well in the year and a half thay he's been here. Trading the pick would have been foolish from a PR standpoint. Trading the pick if Bush had been picked first may have worked. But it's been nearly two years later and Houston is still being panned for picking Williams. At the time the Saints needed more than a football player (or two or three). They needed an icon to rally around. Bush has filled that role admirably. I posit that if the Saints had not picked Bush and done well last year, they would not in fact still be in the region. That's how important picking Bush was. SFIAH Not picking Reggie would have been a marketing disaster. He has contributed to the play of this team last year and this year. I don't think he's been used right this year but I'm not the coach either. Reggie was difinitly the right pick for the Saints last year. Tradin g him for picks would have given us more players but how do we know they would have worked out? We don't. Anyway, I agree with SFIAH Reggie was the pick.

11-25-2007, 10:51 AM	#12
dasaints26 100th Post Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 167	Re: lets go back to 2006 How has the 2006 draft worked out? Lets see we go from 3-13 to 10-6. I would have to say that worked out pretty good. Going from 3-13 to a 1st round bye in the playoffs that is a good turnaround in 1 year. Having the 2nd pick in the draft and getting the best player in the draft is a good deal. How about that draft making it to the divisional championship game for the 1st time in franchise history? No matter who is chosen in our draft some people will say it was a good choice and others will say we had bigger needs in other areas or the other side of the ball. It is also very easy to judge the talent a year or two later after we get to watch them play. The coaches dont have that luxury they have to make a choice on what the scouts tell them and take a chance that the player lives up to the potential.
dasaints26 100th Post Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 167

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey