|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by JOESAM2002 I'll say it again, reggie isn't being used right. He did great with Deuce in the backfield with him because there was another threat back there. Reggie performs better in a 2 back back field. Put ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Fan Since 1967
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
Originally Posted by JOESAM2002
What he said!
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
LB Mentallity
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
once again you have to compare the OL. The vikings had a good OL for running before AP was drafted. Now as far as pass protection goes they leave alot to be desired. We are close, I tell you, to having an OL that can do both. one maybe two pieces away from it. The combination of Brown and Evans could be just as good as Hutchinson and McKinnie are for the Vikings.
|
Last edited by hagan714; 12-06-2007 at 05:22 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Prediction Pain
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
Originally Posted by hagan714
I want Faneca on this team so bad.![]()
I'm terrible when it comes to evaluating offensive linemen, mainly because I follow the ball, but I'd love to hear you guys' thoughts on Strief as a LT. He always seemed to be solid at worst. I feel like Brown and Evans on the right would be fomidable, and if you put Faneca on at LG with whoever at LT, you should be able to run the dang ball. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
100th Post
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Orleans,La
Posts: 306
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
Originally Posted by WillMacKenzie
This is kinda unfair to Reggie. Vikings OL is way better than ours. They make better lanes for Adrian Peterson to run through. If Reggie had those kind of running lanes he would be breaking records.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
They are completely different runners. Reggie is not a power back and never will be, but he is extremely elusive in the open field and needs a big back in with him like we used last year with Deuce. He is an excellent decoy IF there is another threat in there. which we don't have this year after Duec's injury.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,729
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
The main thing that is disturbing about Reggie is he looks worn out. I agree that he also needs to be coached better as a RB. Hopefully next year he can return to the roll he had in 2006. The Saints really need to get another RB to compliment him, one who can get those 4 yard runs consistently, and a RB who can stand up to the pounding of a 25-30 carry type of game.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
OldiesDJ
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
Offensive Schemes have a lot to do with it. Sean Payton abandoned focus on an adequate running game for half of his tenure as a head coach.
According to Yahoo! Sports (http://sports.yahoo.com): Minnesota has rushed 377 times for 2,122 yards and 17 Touchdowns Minnesota has attempted to pass 306 times for 2,131 yards and 8 Touchdowns New Orleans has rushed 292 times for 1,032 yards and 10 Touchdowns New Orleans has attempted to pass 479 times for 3,176 yards, and 20 Touchdowns It's two totally different offenses. Plus, When Adrian Peterson was out, Chester Taylor continued the dominance at Running Back. It's not like Adrian Peterson was making their running game a success, he was just making it more of one. |
Season Ticket Holder Since 2005
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Nachooooooooooo
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Shreveport
Posts: 71
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
To the comment WillMcKenzie made.
I think PT is good, but take away that one, touchdown run and he has a 3.0 yrds/carry average. I think Reggie has done mostly what the coaches expect out of him. It's the media and the fans who have over-hyped him. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
LB Mentallity
|
Re: Reggie Bush vs. Adrian Peterson
New Orleans Saints History officially began on November 1-- All Saints Day-- in 1966.
Not a hard leap of faith to connect religion to anything in the big easy. Fleur de lis simple put is the symbol of New Orleans. Always has been and all ways will be. It is an enduring symbol of , but, being regarded most notably as the emblem of the monarchy, was not adopted officially by any of the . On the contrary as Spain is a constitutional monarchy, lis symbol is associated with the Spanish King Juan Carlos I (of French origin dinasty) and to the Kingdom of Spain. In , the fleur-de-lis is often associated with areas formerly settled by France, such as and and with the in other Canadian provinces. Nobody is avoiding the issue. But if you are going to go in the direction I think you are going to go. I strongly urge you to go to the ultimate smack down section of B&G. You are not the first to bring this topic up. That is were it belongs. You will get plenty response there. |
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins
Last edited by hagan714; 12-08-2007 at 06:00 AM.. |
|
![]() |