David Did Play Well

Euphoria · 12-17-2007, 12:57 PM

Originally Posted by FrenzyFan

This post demonstrates understanding of the concept of safety help, but not very good tape evaluation. On that particular play, the offensive play call had a double in route with required the safety to cover the shorter in route, while McKenzie had to cover the deep route. This was because the defense called was "quarters". It just happened to be the right offensive call against that defense (or the wrong defensive call for that offensive play - depending on how you look at it). If the safety hadn't moved up to cover the shorter in, that's who the ball would have went to and the result would have been the same for the offense. Then we'd be complaining how the safety hadn't moved up to cover the shorter route....

You play to much Madden... LOL! There was a man to cover the inside WR. It was man to man with a saftey to add double coverage on the deepest route. Everyone was covered but the Saftey instead of dropping back went forward to help the DB on the shorter route. Which was weak coverage is why he probably bit on it seeing it happen in front of him he just reacted instead of being disiplined staying home and taking his responsibility on he bit on a drag route which would have been picked up by a LB.

FrenzyFan · 12-17-2007, 01:25 PM

Originally Posted by Euphoria

You play to much Madden... LOL! There was a man to cover the inside WR. It was man to man with a saftey to add double coverage on the deepest route. Everyone was covered but the Saftey instead of dropping back went forward to help the DB on the shorter route. Which was weak coverage is why he probably bit on it seeing it happen in front of him he just reacted instead of being disiplined staying home and taking his responsibility on he bit on a drag route which would have been picked up by a LB.

You must not have watched the game on Fox, because the exact description I gave you above is how the analysts explained that play. I don't play Madden, though I've heard of it. It seems obvious that either you don't know much about defensive play calling and assignments, or you simply cannot admit when you are wrong when it doesn't support your erroneous argument.

WhoDatQB · 12-17-2007, 04:06 PM

TWO POINTS HERE.

1. JASON DAVID SUCKS, he has played some plays well, but I cannot remember him playing well for one whole game. No one plays great for a whole game, but a starting CB should not have as many bad plays as David has this year.

2. JOSH BULLOCKS SUCKS, he has played some plays well, but I cannot remember him playing well for one whole game. No one plays great for a whole game, but a starting S should not have as many bad plays as Bullocks has this year.

12-17-2007, 12:57 PM	#21
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Re: David Did Play Well Originally Posted by FrenzyFan This post demonstrates understanding of the concept of safety help, but not very good tape evaluation. On that particular play, the offensive play call had a double in route with required the safety to cover the shorter in route, while McKenzie had to cover the deep route. This was because the defense called was "quarters". It just happened to be the right offensive call against that defense (or the wrong defensive call for that offensive play - depending on how you look at it). If the safety hadn't moved up to cover the shorter in, that's who the ball would have went to and the result would have been the same for the offense. Then we'd be complaining how the safety hadn't moved up to cover the shorter route.... You play to much Madden... LOL! There was a man to cover the inside WR. It was man to man with a saftey to add double coverage on the deepest route. Everyone was covered but the Saftey instead of dropping back went forward to help the DB on the shorter route. Which was weak coverage is why he probably bit on it seeing it happen in front of him he just reacted instead of being disiplined staying home and taking his responsibility on he bit on a drag route which would have been picked up by a LB.

12-17-2007, 01:25 PM	#22
FrenzyFan 100th Post Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 406	Re: David Did Play Well Originally Posted by Euphoria You play to much Madden... LOL! There was a man to cover the inside WR. It was man to man with a saftey to add double coverage on the deepest route. Everyone was covered but the Saftey instead of dropping back went forward to help the DB on the shorter route. Which was weak coverage is why he probably bit on it seeing it happen in front of him he just reacted instead of being disiplined staying home and taking his responsibility on he bit on a drag route which would have been picked up by a LB. You must not have watched the game on Fox, because the exact description I gave you above is how the analysts explained that play. I don't play Madden, though I've heard of it. It seems obvious that either you don't know much about defensive play calling and assignments, or you simply cannot admit when you are wrong when it doesn't support your erroneous argument.
FrenzyFan 100th Post Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 406

12-17-2007, 04:06 PM	#23
WhoDatQB Boondock Saint Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: F***ing Atlanta Posts: 322	Re: David Did Play Well TWO POINTS HERE. 1. JASON DAVID SUCKS, he has played some plays well, but I cannot remember him playing well for one whole game. No one plays great for a whole game, but a starting CB should not have as many bad plays as David has this year. 2. JOSH BULLOCKS SUCKS, he has played some plays well, but I cannot remember him playing well for one whole game. No one plays great for a whole game, but a starting S should not have as many bad plays as Bullocks has this year.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey