|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; LOL I think Minnesota learned their lessons about taking on WR like that....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
12-17-2007, 10:06 PM | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,985
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
He has been great this year GOD YES !!!. Leadership, Championship rings
|
12-18-2007, 06:06 PM | #13 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
|
12-18-2007, 06:09 PM | #14 |
Cold as Ice!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
resign patten, let devery go and sign crayton.
|
12-18-2007, 06:13 PM | #15 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,744
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
With Branch, Burleson, and Engram on board in Seattle, I can see Hackett possibly leaving for greener pastures. Other names that jump out at me are Berrian (though he's said he wants to stay in Chicago) and Patrick Crayton. I would not be surprised if Payton/Loomis made a strong play for Crayton.
|
12-19-2007, 02:02 AM | #16 |
SoCal Saint
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OB - San Diego, CA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
i watched crayton on sunday...and don't get me wrong he HAS looked great...but he didn't look like he was trying at all. no passion, no WANT for the ball. did anyone else notice this? i was a huge proponent of his earlier...but i dunno now. thoughts?
|
12-19-2007, 07:44 AM | #17 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,773
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
Originally Posted by hagan714
Won't happen.
1. Thank Henderson for his service and wish him well in his next gig. Personally I'd just man up and tell him he's not worth the big money and frankly he's obligated to test the FA market. 2. Resign Patton and install him as the #2 receiver. 3. Get Meachum ready to play. In other words, I wouldn't spend a lick of time on the receiver position this offseason. Now if another gem like Colston is lingering around in the later rounds of the draft, then maybe I spend a pick. Maybe. But free agents? Not unless they want to come play for the minimum. I just can't see justifying paying any more money for receivers right now. That's my nickel (inflation ya know?) to the convo. SFIAH |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
12-19-2007, 08:02 AM | #18 |
The NY Geaux Getter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 348
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
Meacham..Meachem.......that guy who looked like he got a Tic Tac stuck in his epiglottis when the Saints called him on Draft Day?
|
12-19-2007, 07:24 PM | #19 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Re: Should David Patten get re-signed in the offseason?
Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL
Nice post SFIAH. I agree with you completely about letting Henderson go. I am sick and tired of his inconsistency. You can't win in the NFL today if you can't count on your wide receivers to catch a football. The Saints, IMO, have been more than patient enough with Henderson to develop into what he was expected to be, and he just hasn't reached that level. Time to cut our losses and move on.
That being said, I still think our WR corps is a little weak after Colston, and nobody on the FA market stands out to me. Moss is going to go somewhere for HUGE money, and I don't think Patrick Crayton's all that good. Patten (assuming he learns how to hold onto the ball) and Copper are GREAT third options (and Lance Moore is a very solid #4 guy), but we really seem to be missing that #2 option. In all honesty, I'm surprised that Meachem didn't even get a chance to play this season. It's not like any one of our receivers have been playing so lights out that Payton shouldn't want to let the rook start in front of them. The guy is obviously a very talented WR, and I'd like to see him get his shot to be the guy opposite Colston next year. |