for or against shockey??
 

bdub asked for a poll so here it is..

Re: for or against shockey??
 

Well you can debate he'll be a cancer because one can change is stars but its fact the Giants got him out of the locker room with an engery and the team went on to win the SB. Don't need him.

Re: for or against shockey??
 

I really don't know if the player is a Cancer. I just don't think we need another player who hasn't played a full season in while. I might be wrong.

Re: for or against shockey??
 

I am not against getting him because he is a "cancer", I am against getting him because it of what it would cost us

Johnson and Miller had 75 catches between them last year. Yes, 75. I mean, how much more are we going to throw to the TE next year, with or without Shockey? J & M also had 4 TD's vs Shockey's 3.
No, I am not saying Shockey would not be an improvement, I am saying that he isn't worth what it would take to get him.

Re: for or against shockey??
 

Thats a very good point what will it cost the Saints. He's not worth a first, maybe a third.

I like the johnson, miller combo.

Re: for or against shockey??
 

I don't belive Shockey is a cancer... But I alos don't believe he is right for this team.

Why not make a move on a guy like LJ Smith or Kellen Winslow?

Re: for or against shockey??
 

Kellen Winslow the father YES the Kid NO. Dam his head is so big I'm suprised a hemet fits on it.

The kid is not his father and would be lucky if he could be half the TE his father was.

Fred Davis TE USC.

Re: for or against shockey??
 

he can't be a cancer, lol.

Re: for or against shockey??
 

yeah, I think he's a Leo, but don't quote me on that

Re: for or against shockey??
 

look sean knows and has coached him. So if he thinks he is the man then by all means get him. Shockey and Johnson on the field in dual TE set on third and two? talk about a secondary nightmare.