for or against shockey??

pakowitz · 04-13-2008, 08:30 PM

bdub asked for a poll so here it is..

Euphoria · 04-13-2008, 09:10 PM

Well you can debate he'll be a cancer because one can change is stars but its fact the Giants got him out of the locker room with an engery and the team went on to win the SB. Don't need him.

QBREES9 · 04-13-2008, 09:46 PM

I really don't know if the player is a Cancer. I just don't think we need another player who hasn't played a full season in while. I might be wrong.

ScottF · 04-13-2008, 09:53 PM

I am not against getting him because he is a "cancer", I am against getting him because it of what it would cost us

Johnson and Miller had 75 catches between them last year. Yes, 75. I mean, how much more are we going to throw to the TE next year, with or without Shockey? J & M also had 4 TD's vs Shockey's 3.
No, I am not saying Shockey would not be an improvement, I am saying that he isn't worth what it would take to get him.

QBREES9 · 04-13-2008, 09:59 PM

Thats a very good point what will it cost the Saints. He's not worth a first, maybe a third.

I like the johnson, miller combo.

frankeefrank · 04-13-2008, 11:27 PM

I don't belive Shockey is a cancer... But I alos don't believe he is right for this team.

Why not make a move on a guy like LJ Smith or Kellen Winslow?

QBREES9 · 04-13-2008, 11:46 PM

Kellen Winslow the father YES the Kid NO. Dam his head is so big I'm suprised a hemet fits on it.

The kid is not his father and would be lucky if he could be half the TE his father was.

Fred Davis TE USC.

rjakapeanut · 04-14-2008, 12:09 AM

he can't be a cancer, lol.

BlackandBlue · 04-14-2008, 01:29 AM

Originally Posted by rjakapeanut

he can't be a cancer, lol.

yeah, I think he's a Leo, but don't quote me on that

hagan714 · 04-14-2008, 06:46 AM

look sean knows and has coached him. So if he thinks he is the man then by all means get him. Shockey and Johnson on the field in dual TE set on third and two? talk about a secondary nightmare.

View Poll Results: shockey, yes or no?
yes, makes our offense a juggernaut	26	56.52%
no, hes a cancer and will ruin our team	7	15.22%
dont really care either way, GEAUX SAINTS!!	13	28.26%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

04-13-2008, 08:30 PM	#1
pakowitz The Dark Overlord Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,450	for or against shockey?? bdub asked for a poll so here it is..

04-13-2008, 09:10 PM	#2
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Re: for or against shockey?? Well you can debate he'll be a cancer because one can change is stars but its fact the Giants got him out of the locker room with an engery and the team went on to win the SB. Don't need him.

04-13-2008, 09:46 PM	#3
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,985	Re: for or against shockey?? I really don't know if the player is a Cancer. I just don't think we need another player who hasn't played a full season in while. I might be wrong.

04-13-2008, 09:53 PM	#4
ScottF 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 6,324	Re: for or against shockey?? I am not against getting him because he is a "cancer", I am against getting him because it of what it would cost us Johnson and Miller had 75 catches between them last year. Yes, 75. I mean, how much more are we going to throw to the TE next year, with or without Shockey? J & M also had 4 TD's vs Shockey's 3. No, I am not saying Shockey would not be an improvement, I am saying that he isn't worth what it would take to get him.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

04-13-2008, 09:59 PM	#5
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,985	Re: for or against shockey?? Thats a very good point what will it cost the Saints. He's not worth a first, maybe a third. I like the johnson, miller combo.

04-13-2008, 11:27 PM	#6
frankeefrank 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 775	Re: for or against shockey?? I don't belive Shockey is a cancer... But I alos don't believe he is right for this team. Why not make a move on a guy like LJ Smith or Kellen Winslow?
frankeefrank 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 775

04-13-2008, 11:46 PM	#7
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,985	Re: for or against shockey?? Kellen Winslow the father YES the Kid NO. Dam his head is so big I'm suprised a hemet fits on it. The kid is not his father and would be lucky if he could be half the TE his father was. Fred Davis TE USC.
	Last edited by QBREES9; 04-13-2008 at 11:51 PM..

04-14-2008, 12:09 AM	#8
rjakapeanut 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 204	Re: for or against shockey?? he can't be a cancer, lol.
rjakapeanut 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 204

04-14-2008, 01:29 AM	#9
BlackandBlue Kinder, gentler Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,889	Re: for or against shockey?? Originally Posted by rjakapeanut he can't be a cancer, lol. yeah, I think he's a Leo, but don't quote me on that

04-14-2008, 06:46 AM	#10
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: for or against shockey?? look sean knows and has coached him. So if he thinks he is the man then by all means get him. Shockey and Johnson on the field in dual TE set on third and two? talk about a secondary nightmare.