|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I just don't see how we move up for Dorsey and trade for Shockey. It probably has to be one or the other. We only have one second round pick this year. I agree though. You don't take away one ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,137
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
I just don't see how we move up for Dorsey and trade for Shockey. It probably has to be one or the other. We only have one second round pick this year. I agree though. You don't take away one of your best players on a below average defense in Harper to add a TE to your above average offense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
Originally Posted by stockman311
I agree with you stockman, I think it's one or the other, and I sure as hell hope we go and get Dorsey. I'm sold that he's the best defensive player in a draft that has some very good defensive players.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
Originally Posted by stockman311
![]()
10 and 40 for the #2 Harper and a 6th for shockey move Bullocks over to SS so he can play in the box all the time.. play KK at FS and pick up a safety in the 3rd... i could see it happen |
![]() |