|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; From Monday Morning QB: "This one really surprises me, and at first I didn't think it was true, but New Orleans is serious about trading into the top four -- preferably for LSU defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey but not only ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-21-2008, 08:18 AM | #1 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
from peter kings MMQ
From Monday Morning QB:
"This one really surprises me, and at first I didn't think it was true, but New Orleans is serious about trading into the top four -- preferably for LSU defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey but not only for Dorsey. Wish I could tell you the other apple of their eye, but I don't know who he is." Also of interest: "The Saints and Jeremy Shockey's rookie-year offensive coordinator, Sean Payton, are still hot for the tight end. It won't get done if the Giants insist on receiving in-his-prime, 25-year-old safety Roman Harper (a 2006 second-round pick), plus the 40th pick in the draft. Harper's the best player in New Orleans' secondary, and to trade him and a second-round pick for an injury-plagued tight end who will be 28 on opening day is not an equitable deal. If the Giants want, say, Harper and a sixth-round pick for Shockey, or a second- and sixth-rounder for him, then I could see the trade getting done." |
I Live In Beastmode!
|
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-21-2008, 08:31 AM | #2 |
Part Time Pimp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
I really hope they go out & get Dorsey. We need a disruptor at the DT position & Dorsey is non-stop for four quarters.
|
04-21-2008, 10:37 AM | #3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,985
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
We can't give up Harper. I'm all for trading up and getting Dorsey.
|
04-21-2008, 01:35 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,137
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
I just don't see how we move up for Dorsey and trade for Shockey. It probably has to be one or the other. We only have one second round pick this year. I agree though. You don't take away one of your best players on a below average defense in Harper to add a TE to your above average offense.
|
04-21-2008, 01:44 PM | #6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
Originally Posted by stockman311
I agree with you stockman, I think it's one or the other, and I sure as hell hope we go and get Dorsey. I'm sold that he's the best defensive player in a draft that has some very good defensive players.
|
04-21-2008, 01:50 PM | #7 |
500th Post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 807
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
|
04-21-2008, 01:57 PM | #8 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
my thinking it might be chris long.. with will smith becoming a FA and long being a high motor guy with great character.. have a crazy pass rush on 3rd downs
|
04-21-2008, 01:59 PM | #9 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
Originally Posted by stockman311
10 and 40 for the #2 Harper and a 6th for shockey move Bullocks over to SS so he can play in the box all the time.. play KK at FS and pick up a safety in the 3rd... i could see it happen |
04-21-2008, 02:09 PM | #10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,137
|
Re: from peter kings MMQ
Ugghhh. Bullocks and KK as our starting safeties?!? I think I just threw up in my mouth.
|