trade back twice in the first?

BRSaintsFan · 04-23-2008, 06:32 PM

As much as I hate the idea of trading down, trading down to get two proven players and still getting a 1st round rookie prospect would be worth it if we can not get Dorsey.

WVSaint · 04-23-2008, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by BRSaintsFan

As much as I hate the idea of trading down, trading down to get two proven players and still getting a 1st round rookie prospect would be worth it if we can not get Dorsey.

thats what im saying, if dorsey or ellis are not available at 10. id love to see us trade down.

CantonLegend · 04-23-2008, 07:57 PM

its great in principal but i just dont see it happening....trades are complicated when they involve picks because if the giants are content at staying at 31 they wont even consider a trade to 19....we forget....moving up wont guarentee getting a better player

04-23-2008, 06:32 PM	#1
BRSaintsFan 100th Post Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 449	Re: trade back twice in the first? As much as I hate the idea of trading down, trading down to get two proven players and still getting a 1st round rookie prospect would be worth it if we can not get Dorsey.

04-23-2008, 06:34 PM	#2
WVSaint 500th Post Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: West Virginia Posts: 807	Re: trade back twice in the first? Originally Posted by BRSaintsFan As much as I hate the idea of trading down, trading down to get two proven players and still getting a 1st round rookie prospect would be worth it if we can not get Dorsey. thats what im saying, if dorsey or ellis are not available at 10. id love to see us trade down.

04-23-2008, 07:57 PM	#3
CantonLegend 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 2,685 Blog Entries: 2	Re: trade back twice in the first? its great in principal but i just dont see it happening....trades are complicated when they involve picks because if the giants are content at staying at 31 they wont even consider a trade to 19....we forget....moving up wont guarentee getting a better player