|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by NEPASaint I've been a Saints fan since they took George Rogers over Lawrence Taylor. So, I've been accustomed to disappointments year after year. There have been quite a few bright spots since that time too. [quote[ There ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-03-2008, 01:03 PM | #31 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,773
|
Re: 2008 predictions
Originally Posted by NEPASaint
There have been quite a few bright spots since that time too.
[quote[ There is quite a bit of optimism for 2008. I have seen improvements especially on the defensive side of the ball. However, there are still question marks in a few places. One, will Deuce McAllister be anything near his former self? If not, will the Saints give the ball consistantly to Pierre Thomas? [/quote] This Saints team under Payton doesn't give the ball consistently to anyone in the run game. For all the talk of Deuce being his former self, in 2006 Deuce only ran for 1057 yards on 244 carries. That's an average of 15 carries per game for 66 yards per game. This Saints offense isn't going to rush for a ton of yards. What they need to be able to do is to be consistent in the run game. The Saints have three offensive indicators of success: The number of passes Brees throws, the number of turnovers, and the yards per carry. When the Saints have positive results in those areas, the offense does well. Keep Brees' passes around 35, the number of turnovers to 1, and the YPC a shade above 4 and everything is fine. So does that mean 30 rushes? Nope. Does that mean Deuce or PT23, or Bush needs to gain 1500 yards in a season? Nope. It just means that when the Saints rush thhe ball they need to be productive and not turn the ball over. Each one of the 4 backs that we have on staff have done it on occasion. The issue is consistency. If Deuce gets 10 rushes per game for 45 yards, gets 3 first downs, and doesn't turn the ball over, then he's been productive. But that's only 700 yards for the season.
But it only needs to be productive, not explosive. You rush the ball 20 times for 90 yards, and that's enough to make the defense have to defend the run.
The other aspect of a productive running game is setting up play action. If a defense knows that you're simply going to wave the ball at the back, then they'll start to ignore the threat of the rush. The Saints have 4 guys that showed the potential of being productive. I hope that PT23 gets a lot more time on the field so that Deuce can be available when we need him.
There's no reason to think that he can't.
Also he'll be playing the Will LB. Many of those tackles that he used to make in the Mike will now go to Vilma.
I have my hopes way up. I hope that you can do the same. SFIAH |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
05-04-2008, 03:59 PM | #32 |
Fan Since 1967
|
Re: 2008 predictions
1. 13-3 regular season.
2. The Dome Patrol is Back. 3. No team can run on us. 4. We're ranked 5th in total defense but 12th against the pass. 5. We beat the Redskins in the NFC Championship. 6. We beat the Jaguars in the Superbowl 31-17. Now, suck on that for a while! |
05-04-2008, 04:41 PM | #33 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: 2008 predictions
I am exited for the 08 season. Admittedly too excited. I'm intoxicated on kool-aid. Maybe I'll sober up over the next few months. Looks like another deep thought discussion hosted by JKool. Tempered enthusiasm vs unbridled excitement. |
05-04-2008, 10:42 PM | #34 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: 2008 predictions
Hmm... I'm not sure what I had to do with it...
SFIAH, nice analysis! I'm kind of with lynwood on this one. It is very hard to make much of a prediction on this at least until we know who is going to make the roster. As of now, it seems pretty safe to say that the improvements we've made and what we have from last year looks VERY good compared to our division rivals. All said, as of right now, I'm pretty convinced by SFIAH. 13-3 seems like a very good possibility. I always like to throw in an extra loss or two, just to be on the safe side. It looks pretty hard to deny that we'll be the division champs, though. |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
05-05-2008, 12:51 AM | #35 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: 2008 predictions
|
05-05-2008, 04:47 AM | #36 |
LB Mentallity
|
Re: 2008 predictions
Sfiah nice post.
iceshack149 belittling comment the draft does appear to be a bust in 2007 but I think this year we will get a better idea how good or how bad the draft was. the OL is going to evolve in the next 3 years, IMO, from a pass blocking unit that needed creative play calling to make the run work. To a unit that dares you to stop them. I like the depth of this group, well on paper. Now I want them on the field to see if I can really stomach them. LT is the last ingredient I think we need. |
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins
|
|
05-05-2008, 09:32 AM | #37 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: 2008 predictions
Ice, I didn't feel belittled at all. I just didn't want to get credit for something I hadn't done.
So many great discussions going on now! I couldn't be more pleased. |