Like I said in my earlier post. I NEVER liked Josh Bullocks. He sucked when we were good and he sucked when we were bad. He is the WORST player on our roster in my opinion. He cannot catch consistently, so he cannot be a significant playmaker. He's a liability agianst the run because he does not tackle well and takes poor angles. For a guy that is supposedly so fast he always seems to be late in pass coverage. Is it only me that thought that KK was SOOO much better when he got the start during Bullocks injury last year? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Bullocks is not a product of a bad defense. The bad defense is a product of Bullocks. Piece of F^&&*&*% S%@#. I will argue this until I die.

If he is sooo bad at coverage as you claim.....can you explain why over 80% of deep routes thrown on us last year where on the FS side of the field? One man does not make a defense bad. It does leave a hole...but this is not tennis.

P.S. If DB's could catch....they would be on offense!

Ahh excuse me here, I hate to get in the middle of two men at each other and doing it rather politely I might add.

But That last comment was just not fair.

You just dropped your guard and left yourself wide open here.

Confused

I will give you a hint.

The starting FS for the Saints is a guy whose name does not end with Harper.

Just thought I would warn you that a sucker punch is coming.

Other than that this has been a pretty good one. I will go back to watching now

The point was that the deep balls where trown "on" the FS "side" of the field (ie. the left) not on the FS and if you look at the film...almost never against Bullocks.