|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; They're entitled to their opinion but the only way to find out is to play each other heads up. The only thing that irked me what the fact they pointed out that the Vikings are better because they have a ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-29-2009, 08:33 PM | #11 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,744
|
Re: Vikings better?
They're entitled to their opinion but the only way to find out is to play each other heads up. The only thing that irked me what the fact they pointed out that the Vikings are better because they have a better rushing attack, which just isn't the case. There's a difference in having a better running back versus better rushing attack. Peterson is all world but when you stack he and Taylor up against our trio, we have the 4th ranked rushing attack in the NFL as opposed to the Vikings' 10th. So that comment which they made didn't make any sense. If you go to NFL.com and compare basically every offensive statistic, we are superior to them. Heck even our offensive line rates better than them.
In total defense, they're 12th and we're 16th. Their rushing defense is far superior to ours but we haven't had Ellis playing for quite awhile... which definitely hurts that number. As far as our secondaries are concerned, we take the edge on that one. I do believe even if we were completely healthy, their defense is better than ours. With that said, even the best defenses in the league have trouble stopping our #1 ranked offense. The only defense I'd be scared to play in the NFL is a completely healthy Steelers D. I just don't see us having problem putting up enough points to beat anyone else. If we were to play head to head, it would be a great game to watch. The reason why I think we'd come out on top is the fact Favre has broken down towards the tail end of the last couple of seasons. He's always been prone to making mistakes and we now have a defense that can capitalize on it. Also as good as Peterson is, he too has trouble holding on to the football. This is the same Saints D of old... we've been making people pay when they turn the football over. And because of that, I think we'd come out on top. They think the Vikes are a better team... fine. I think otherwise... fine. Hopefully we'll be able to meet in the playoffs and fine out. |
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
All little common sense goes a long way. |
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
11-29-2009, 09:12 PM | #12 |
Saint Historian
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick & steel of a nondescript building..
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Vikings better?
Take a look at SOS (which is the 5th tiebreaker breaker on HFA)
Vikings opponents: 45-76 (.372) Saints 1st 10 opponents: 41-69 (.372) Saints beat Patriots: 48-72 (.397) Saints lose to Pats: 49-71 (.405) No matter what happens on MNF, the Saints have played a harder schedule... |
11-29-2009, 09:53 PM | #13 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Vikings better?
the vikings defense is all condensed into 3 stud defensive linemen
however......we have arguably the best offensive line in the league even with goodwin and a backup LT drew is arguably the most elusive QB in the league when hes in the pocket drew has better pocket awareness than any QB they have played our running game is better than any other team they have played.......our QB is better than any other QB they have played our defense is better than any other defense they have played our record is better than theirs and our schedule is tougher than theirs the ONLY reason they are getting so much credit is because of brett favre let me re-iterate that.....the vikings are the beneficiaries of a scrub schedule and are beating up on a terrible nfc north(can you believe the packers are 7-3? lmao) the only reason they are getting so much press....so much respect......so much credit is because of brett favre.......they have only beaten 1 good team and that was by a last second field goal against baltimore the other good team they played? the steelers beat them by 10 |
"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
|
|
11-29-2009, 09:53 PM | #14 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
|
Re: Vikings better?
To say that the Saints do not have a run game is senseless. The Saints run the ball more than they pass it. I think we are hearing from game announcers who have not done their homework.
We do not have that one great running back, like Adrian Peterson, but we have an excellent running game. The Vikings, I suspect, use the run as much as they do because of Brett Favre's age. He had an age-related meltdown last season with the Jets, and the Vikings don't want another one. The Saints and the Vikings have to face one another head on to finally answer this question. Both great teams. I would guess that whoever is at home will win. |
11-29-2009, 10:03 PM | #15 |
Guam Saints Fan
|
Re: Vikings better?
Originally Posted by saintpaul25
true agree with that its only because of bret.
|
11-29-2009, 10:04 PM | #16 |
Guam Saints Fan
|
Re: Vikings better?
|
11-29-2009, 10:06 PM | #17 |
Guam Saints Fan
|
Re: Vikings better?
i feel our front 4 is pretty sick but we need sed back.. hargrove is amazing.. i think adding in mcray in the middle would add some valuable pass rush.
|
11-29-2009, 10:09 PM | #20 |
Guam Saints Fan
|
Re: Vikings better?
Originally Posted by Frederick Smith
good analysis frederick. true only a ring and our biggest test will tell us how good we truly are. although we did have some hard games prior to the tampa game.
|
|
|