|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I don't think so, and truthfully there was a game recently where neither Bell or PT were rolling, and Bush came in and had I think 75 yards on 5 or 6 carries. He had his problems earlier this year, ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-01-2009, 05:01 PM | #11 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,101
|
Re: Better without Bush???
I don't think so, and truthfully there was a game recently where neither Bell or PT were rolling, and Bush came in and had I think 75 yards on 5 or 6 carries. He had his problems earlier this year, but I think he was beginning to run better the two games before the injury
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
12-01-2009, 05:05 PM | #12 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Better without Bush???
just like the giants were better without shockey
we were 9-0 this year with reggie......we are 2-0 without him that doesnt mean we are better without him we are 11-0 without lance moore and jammal brown too does that mean we are better without them? no.....it means we played lights out and dominated a team that deserves almost all the credit it ever gets reggie would've scored against the pats and we would've had another passing TD to add to brees' total |
12-01-2009, 05:13 PM | #13 |
E. Side Cholo
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: Better without Bush???
Originally Posted by CantonLegend
I think that's a good answer.
PAUL, I just got the "like other facets in life" joke--lol.... I dont know, man, I'm from the 80s, so this totally barren look is weird to me--- I need just a little at least-- so I feel at home. |
12-01-2009, 05:15 PM | #14 |
Senior Citizen
|
Re: Better without Bush???
I just want to say, that I'm NOT trying to start anything with this question, it's just a question. Maybe, just maybe, the Pats spent all week preparing for Bush in the game, only to find out he wasn't going to play, which could have gotten in their heads a little bit. Maybe...
|
12-01-2009, 05:23 PM | #15 |
Cake or Death?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,608
|
Re: Better without Bush???
The Saints are even better with Bush is the correct answer. And that should scare the Redskins.
|
12-01-2009, 05:25 PM | #16 |
Senior Citizen
|
Re: Better without Bush???
What can I say? I'm a firm believer that "bald is beautiful".
|
12-01-2009, 05:29 PM | #17 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Better without Bush???
|
12-01-2009, 06:04 PM | #18 |
E. Side Cholo
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: Better without Bush???
uh uh... just too weird. bear in mind, the first "educational film" I ever saw was made in the early 70s, if that tells you anything.
You know, in a few more years, this joke wont even make sense, as no one will call it that anymore. It's like "rolling up" your window, "dialing" your phone, or "cranking" something up. BOOGER ON REVENGE OF THE NERDS: "We have Bush." PERSON IN THE YEAR 2012: "What do plants have to do with a party?" |
12-01-2009, 06:20 PM | #19 |
Hou Saints Fan
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
|
Re: Question (regarding Bush)
Well when Reggie isn't in the game, Sean doesn't try to force Reggie as the main guy on offense but at the same time when Reggie is in the game, defenses key on him and it helps open up the field. I think this production with out Reggie is just a product of this elite team and would be even greater with him in the line up
|
12-01-2009, 07:43 PM | #20 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,073
|
Re: Question (regarding Bush)
Reggie is still incredibly useful to Sean Payton. He will most likely reduce his contract because he knows he is used correctly here and that this team is a winner. I don't think he will want to go anywhere else, he's got a good thing going in New Orleans and he knows it.
|