Question (regarding Bush)

skymike · 12-01-2009, 04:13 PM

Originally Posted by CantonLegend

just like the giants were better without shockey

we were 9-0 this year with reggie......we are 2-0 without him

that doesnt mean we are better without him

we are 11-0 without lance moore and jammal brown too

does that mean we are better without them?

no.....it means we played lights out and dominated a team that deserves almost all the credit it ever gets

reggie would've scored against the pats and we would've had another passing TD to add to brees' total

I think that's a good answer.

PAUL, I just got the "like other facets in life" joke--lol.... I dont know, man, I'm from the 80s, so this totally barren look is weird to me--- I need just a little at least-- so I feel at home.

12-01-2009, 04:13 PM	#13
skymike E. Side Cholo Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Barrio, H-town Posts: 6,089	Re: Better without Bush??? Originally Posted by CantonLegend just like the giants were better without shockey we were 9-0 this year with reggie......we are 2-0 without him that doesnt mean we are better without him we are 11-0 without lance moore and jammal brown too does that mean we are better without them? no.....it means we played lights out and dominated a team that deserves almost all the credit it ever gets reggie would've scored against the pats and we would've had another passing TD to add to brees' total I think that's a good answer. PAUL, I just got the "like other facets in life" joke--lol.... I dont know, man, I'm from the 80s, so this totally barren look is weird to me--- I need just a little at least-- so I feel at home.