#1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins?

BIGEASY504 · 01-20-2010, 05:03 PM

Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this!

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by BIGEASY504

Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this!

True, if you can run stop and pass rush as good as the Vikes you can easily win it. But since they are not your forte... #13 in sacks and #21 in rush D. Compared to the Vikes #1 in sacks and #2 in rush D.

Ok it's now time for the Saints injury and reg season stats don't mean crap report, especially when it's bad for the Saints.

spkb25 · 01-20-2010, 05:41 PM

Originally Posted by Vike4Life

True, if you can run stop and pass rush as good as the Vikes you can easily win it. But since they are not your forte... #13 in sacks and #21 in rush D. Compared to the Vikes #1 in sacks and #2 in rush D.

Ok it's now time for the Saints injury and reg season stats don't mean crap report, especially when it's bad for the Saints.

They mean a lot- 13 wins, u guys had less, right?

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 05:49 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

They mean a lot- 13 wins, u guys had less, right?

Wow! you found a stat that actually matters. Yes the Vikes should have beat the Bears and had HFA. But you should be VERY glad they did lose, because if they didn't the Saints would have NO CHANCE coming into the 9-0 Metrodome... compared to the 2 loss Superdome.

spkb25 · 01-20-2010, 06:03 PM

Originally Posted by Vike4Life

Yes the Vikes should have beat the Bears and had HFA.

Ohhhh yeah- the ol coulda, woulda, shoulda argument. Meaningless- completely.

lumm0x · 01-20-2010, 07:53 PM

Originally Posted by Vike4Life

Wow! you found a stat that actually matters. Yes the Vikes should have beat the Bears and had HFA. But you should be VERY glad they did lose, because if they didn't the Saints would have NO CHANCE coming into the 9-0 Metrodome... compared to the 2 loss Superdome.

Should have.....that's funny. We're counting should have won games now. You haven't won on the road in 2 months. You should have done better than that. You haven't proven you can win on the road at all and you couldn't win important games at the end of the season even when facing ousted competition with your starters in. Must be pumping crowd noise in the Metrodome and poisoning the opponents water cause away from there you resemble mediocre teams that are watching the playoffs right now. Your swiss cheese secondary will have fits against a powerful passing attack just like the Cards gave you. Gregg Williams has all his defensive backs healthy finally and you should check our stats defensively when we have Porter, Greer, Harper and Sharper all in the game. Just like he did to Warner, GW will wheel out the chair to take Brett away to his southern retirement home.

xan · 01-20-2010, 05:36 PM

At this point, as Dennis Green might say, you are what we think you are and you are what your record says. You're a 4 loss team when the games counted. We're a two loss team when the games counted. Our losses totaled 10 points, one in OT, and while the loss to TB is embarrassing, not indicative of the current team as 11 starters sat (3 corners, 1 safety, 1 DT, 2 LB's, 1 TE, 2 RBs, 1 OT.)

If I were you, I'd be VERY afraid.

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 05:52 PM

It's been nice chatting with ya'll, but I'll be back tomorrow to see what you've got to say.

BTW, I can't wait to come back after the game and do some more chatting.

leilung · 01-20-2010, 05:55 PM

My God man! The vikings play in a conference where they play the Lions and the Bears TWICE!!! Just like the Packers and their #1 D ranking, the Vikes have been exposed numerous times by decent teams all season, and the ranking is more smoke and mirrors than you care to admit!

I'm predicting ANOTHER statement game with a 21 pt margin of victory for the Saints! Maybe then, as Aretha sings, we'll start getting a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T!

WHO DAT?!

strato · 01-20-2010, 06:31 PM

The Vikes would be 9-7 at best in the NFC south...Just look what Carolina did to them...and what were going to do them..better be glad you play in that weak as Division..or you wouldnt even be coming to our fine city..

01-20-2010, 05:03 PM	#1
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this!
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487

01-20-2010, 05:37 PM	#2
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by BIGEASY504 Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this! True, if you can run stop and pass rush as good as the Vikes you can easily win it. But since they are not your forte... #13 in sacks and #21 in rush D. Compared to the Vikes #1 in sacks and #2 in rush D. Ok it's now time for the Saints injury and reg season stats don't mean crap report, especially when it's bad for the Saints.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 05:41 PM	#3
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,145	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by Vike4Life True, if you can run stop and pass rush as good as the Vikes you can easily win it. But since they are not your forte... #13 in sacks and #21 in rush D. Compared to the Vikes #1 in sacks and #2 in rush D. Ok it's now time for the Saints injury and reg season stats don't mean crap report, especially when it's bad for the Saints. They mean a lot- 13 wins, u guys had less, right?

01-20-2010, 05:49 PM	#4
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by spkb25 They mean a lot- 13 wins, u guys had less, right? Wow! you found a stat that actually matters. Yes the Vikes should have beat the Bears and had HFA. But you should be VERY glad they did lose, because if they didn't the Saints would have NO CHANCE coming into the 9-0 Metrodome... compared to the 2 loss Superdome.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 05:36 PM	#7
xan Professor Crab and Site Donor 2014 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Princeton Posts: 3,373 Blog Entries: 34	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? At this point, as Dennis Green might say, you are what we think you are and you are what your record says. You're a 4 loss team when the games counted. We're a two loss team when the games counted. Our losses totaled 10 points, one in OT, and while the loss to TB is embarrassing, not indicative of the current team as 11 starters sat (3 corners, 1 safety, 1 DT, 2 LB's, 1 TE, 2 RBs, 1 OT.) If I were you, I'd be VERY afraid.

01-20-2010, 06:03 PM	#5
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,145	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by Vike4Life Yes the Vikes should have beat the Bears and had HFA. Ohhhh yeah- the ol coulda, woulda, shoulda argument. Meaningless- completely.

01-20-2010, 07:53 PM	#6
lumm0x Resident antediluvian Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,026	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by Vike4Life Wow! you found a stat that actually matters. Yes the Vikes should have beat the Bears and had HFA. But you should be VERY glad they did lose, because if they didn't the Saints would have NO CHANCE coming into the 9-0 Metrodome... compared to the 2 loss Superdome. Should have.....that's funny. We're counting should have won games now. You haven't won on the road in 2 months. You should have done better than that. You haven't proven you can win on the road at all and you couldn't win important games at the end of the season even when facing ousted competition with your starters in. Must be pumping crowd noise in the Metrodome and poisoning the opponents water cause away from there you resemble mediocre teams that are watching the playoffs right now. Your swiss cheese secondary will have fits against a powerful passing attack just like the Cards gave you. Gregg Williams has all his defensive backs healthy finally and you should check our stats defensively when we have Porter, Greer, Harper and Sharper all in the game. Just like he did to Warner, GW will wheel out the chair to take Brett away to his southern retirement home.

01-20-2010, 05:52 PM	#8
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? It's been nice chatting with ya'll, but I'll be back tomorrow to see what you've got to say. BTW, I can't wait to come back after the game and do some more chatting.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 05:55 PM	#9
leilung Booty Bandit Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: The Wastelands that are NJ Posts: 1,432	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? My God man! The vikings play in a conference where they play the Lions and the Bears TWICE!!! Just like the Packers and their #1 D ranking, the Vikes have been exposed numerous times by decent teams all season, and the ranking is more smoke and mirrors than you care to admit! I'm predicting ANOTHER statement game with a 21 pt margin of victory for the Saints! Maybe then, as Aretha sings, we'll start getting a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T! WHO DAT?!

01-20-2010, 06:31 PM	#10
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? The Vikes would be 9-7 at best in the NFC south...Just look what Carolina did to them...and what were going to do them..better be glad you play in that weak as Division..or you wouldnt even be coming to our fine city..