#1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins?

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 04:47 PM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

Injuries are not the excuse Sunday brother. Lack of injuries is what you Epicaly Fail to understand. It is what you will be scratching you head/azz on Sunday afternoon wondering what happened.

Farve is Great but he is not Gandalf the Gray or White and has no magical spell for when he does not have the ball.

The first rule in Combat and war is to KNOW your enemy. You and the other Viqueen know your ranks (maybe) but do not know or understand your enemy.

You are so full of your own ignorance you have not even taken the time to assess the opponent. You have no clue that the Defense you will face on Sunday was absent from week 7 till last Sat.

Live in your ignorance, drink your purple kool-aid you get from ESPN, and the Dallas Twins on NFL Channel.

Come back Monday and PLEASE relive your Sunday Experience with us.

Keep in mind the Same "You are facing an Epic quarterback" was preached to us all last week.

I was waiting for someone in the stands to run and jump on top of him as he paused in the prone position to gather him self on the field and yell into his face "You got knocked the F&$% out!"

I know the Saints, you all seem to put everything on being injured. Also, as I pointed out, most of your INT's and scores came against rookies and 2nd year QB's. Please don't say the Vikes didn't score against similar... I'm NOT saying our D is a scoring D, just a run stopping pass rushing make a team one dimensional D.

spkb25 · 01-20-2010, 04:49 PM

the only stat i am aware of that matters is 13-3, which means we won more games n r playing @ home as a result- right?

DrewDat · 01-20-2010, 04:54 PM

I wanna hear you bring stats from home come sunday vike4life

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

I find it difficult not to insult a man who comes into forums and spews ignorant accusations. He gets what he gives.

Thank you for the spelling correction. I was pretty heated when i was replying.

Ignorant? I bring stats, I have reasonable conclusions based on them. All I've learned from every Saints fan is that
#1 your whole D was out and cheerleaders replaced them... excuse the hyperbole
#2 Because you can INT rookies (9 INTS plus 2 on Henne) you can INT a HOFer with 7 all year
#3 The reason the D stats are so bad is the offense gets off the field so fast, your O's TOP is 31:36. So the D isn't out there that much more.

Other than that just a lot of jeering with no real substance.

BIGEASY504 · 01-20-2010, 05:03 PM

Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this!

spkb25 · 01-20-2010, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by Vike4Life

Ignorant? I bring stats, I have reasonable conclusions based on them. All I've learned from every Saints fan is that
#1 your whole D was out and cheerleaders replaced them... excuse the hyperbole
#2 Because you can INT rookies (9 INTS plus 2 on Henne) you can INT a HOFer with 7 all year
#3 The reason the D stats are so bad is the offense gets off the field so fast, your O's TOP is 31:36. So the D isn't out there that much more.

Other than that just a lot of jeering with no real substance.

Well we do not want to do that with Childress- we all know what he is capable of

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by st thomas

vikedude you ever hear of double team both outside ends and still can slip a screen to bush or p.t. or throw it deep it will be done viko

I don't know about the Saints but the Vikes LB's are responsible for smelling out those simple screens and if you have 2 TE's then we can double your WR's.... simple. Hopefully your SP has more.

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 05:32 PM

Originally Posted by breesfan27

Am I the only one seeing this???? You tell us not to use injuries as an excuse, yet you just did. Hypocrite much?

I'm not using them as an excuse as I've posted many time, injuries happen it's the NFL. Vikes did what they could and unfortunately the "Jekyll and Hyde" Cards were on a Jekyll day, like they were against GB. You got lucky to catch a Hyde day.

xan · 01-20-2010, 05:36 PM

At this point, as Dennis Green might say, you are what we think you are and you are what your record says. You're a 4 loss team when the games counted. We're a two loss team when the games counted. Our losses totaled 10 points, one in OT, and while the loss to TB is embarrassing, not indicative of the current team as 11 starters sat (3 corners, 1 safety, 1 DT, 2 LB's, 1 TE, 2 RBs, 1 OT.)

If I were you, I'd be VERY afraid.

Vike4Life · 01-20-2010, 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by BIGEASY504

Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this!

True, if you can run stop and pass rush as good as the Vikes you can easily win it. But since they are not your forte... #13 in sacks and #21 in rush D. Compared to the Vikes #1 in sacks and #2 in rush D.

Ok it's now time for the Saints injury and reg season stats don't mean crap report, especially when it's bad for the Saints.

01-20-2010, 04:47 PM	#71
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by x626xBlack Injuries are not the excuse Sunday brother. Lack of injuries is what you Epicaly Fail to understand. It is what you will be scratching you head/azz on Sunday afternoon wondering what happened. Farve is Great but he is not Gandalf the Gray or White and has no magical spell for when he does not have the ball. The first rule in Combat and war is to KNOW your enemy. You and the other Viqueen know your ranks (maybe) but do not know or understand your enemy. You are so full of your own ignorance you have not even taken the time to assess the opponent. You have no clue that the Defense you will face on Sunday was absent from week 7 till last Sat. Live in your ignorance, drink your purple kool-aid you get from ESPN, and the Dallas Twins on NFL Channel. Come back Monday and PLEASE relive your Sunday Experience with us. Keep in mind the Same "You are facing an Epic quarterback" was preached to us all last week. I was waiting for someone in the stands to run and jump on top of him as he paused in the prone position to gather him self on the field and yell into his face "You got knocked the F&$% out!" I know the Saints, you all seem to put everything on being injured. Also, as I pointed out, most of your INT's and scores came against rookies and 2nd year QB's. Please don't say the Vikes didn't score against similar... I'm NOT saying our D is a scoring D, just a run stopping pass rushing make a team one dimensional D.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 04:49 PM	#72
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,093	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? the only stat i am aware of that matters is 13-3, which means we won more games n r playing @ home as a result- right?

01-20-2010, 04:54 PM	#73
DrewDat DOMEPATROL Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Jacksonville,Florida Due To Military Obligation Posts: 479	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? I wanna hear you bring stats from home come sunday vike4life

01-20-2010, 04:58 PM	#74
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by x626xBlack I find it difficult not to insult a man who comes into forums and spews ignorant accusations. He gets what he gives. Thank you for the spelling correction. I was pretty heated when i was replying. Ignorant? I bring stats, I have reasonable conclusions based on them. All I've learned from every Saints fan is that #1 your whole D was out and cheerleaders replaced them... excuse the hyperbole #2 Because you can INT rookies (9 INTS plus 2 on Henne) you can INT a HOFer with 7 all year #3 The reason the D stats are so bad is the offense gets off the field so fast, your O's TOP is 31:36. So the D isn't out there that much more. Other than that just a lot of jeering with no real substance.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 05:03 PM	#75
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this!
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-20-2010, 05:13 PM	#76
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,093	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by Vike4Life Ignorant? I bring stats, I have reasonable conclusions based on them. All I've learned from every Saints fan is that #1 your whole D was out and cheerleaders replaced them... excuse the hyperbole #2 Because you can INT rookies (9 INTS plus 2 on Henne) you can INT a HOFer with 7 all year #3 The reason the D stats are so bad is the offense gets off the field so fast, your O's TOP is 31:36. So the D isn't out there that much more. Other than that just a lot of jeering with no real substance. Well we do not want to do that with Childress- we all know what he is capable of Attached Thumbnails

01-20-2010, 05:29 PM	#77
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by st thomas vikedude you ever hear of double team both outside ends and still can slip a screen to bush or p.t. or throw it deep it will be done viko I don't know about the Saints but the Vikes LB's are responsible for smelling out those simple screens and if you have 2 TE's then we can double your WR's.... simple. Hopefully your SP has more.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 05:32 PM	#78
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by breesfan27 Am I the only one seeing this???? You tell us not to use injuries as an excuse, yet you just did. Hypocrite much? I'm not using them as an excuse as I've posted many time, injuries happen it's the NFL. Vikes did what they could and unfortunately the "Jekyll and Hyde" Cards were on a Jekyll day, like they were against GB. You got lucky to catch a Hyde day.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72

01-20-2010, 05:36 PM	#79
xan Professor Crab and Site Donor 2014 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Princeton Posts: 3,368 Blog Entries: 34	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? At this point, as Dennis Green might say, you are what we think you are and you are what your record says. You're a 4 loss team when the games counted. We're a two loss team when the games counted. Our losses totaled 10 points, one in OT, and while the loss to TB is embarrassing, not indicative of the current team as 11 starters sat (3 corners, 1 safety, 1 DT, 2 LB's, 1 TE, 2 RBs, 1 OT.) If I were you, I'd be VERY afraid.

01-20-2010, 05:37 PM	#80
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72	Re: #1 O vs #6 D and #5 O vs #25 D Who wins? Originally Posted by BIGEASY504 Once Farve is pressured he gets erratic, we stop the run cause Peterson and the reports I’ve read thinks he can have a good game considering what happened against the Card and I’m quite sure they seen the Atlanta came and a few others. I like our secondary against the Vikings receivers. The way we played against the Cardinals I haven’t seen that D since maybe the Patriots game (?) We stop the run on our way to Farve we can win this! True, if you can run stop and pass rush as good as the Vikes you can easily win it. But since they are not your forte... #13 in sacks and #21 in rush D. Compared to the Vikes #1 in sacks and #2 in rush D. Ok it's now time for the Saints injury and reg season stats don't mean crap report, especially when it's bad for the Saints.
Vike4Life Registered Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 72