Colts Receivers better than Ours?

indy4192 · 02-02-2010, 04:20 PM

They are two different issues. There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit, but that doesn't mean they will win the game, because as the local and national media has said, the Colts are defenseless without Freeney and the Saints will role.

Originally Posted by JoanieNTX

But the thing is that Indy must be schizo or bi-polar (no offense to those who have the legit problem), because one minute he concedes defeat to the Saints, and the next, he's touting the Dolts offense as the best there is. Make up your mind, Indy!

Papa Voodoo · 02-02-2010, 04:27 PM

Originally Posted by indy4192

They are two different issues. There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit, but that doesn't mean they will win the game, because as the local and national media has said, the Colts are defenseless without Freeney and the Saints will role.

I understanding that razzing opposing teams' message boards is well and good, but willy nilly opinions are silly willy.

The Saints, not the Colts have the better offensive unit. Saints have 4 big time recievers to the Colts' 2 1/2 (Collie is not that wonderful). The Saints have 3 RB's to the Colts' 1. Let's call the TE position a wash.

Besides that, the number 1 offense in the NFL this season is New orleans. The Colts aren't even number 2. The Colts have the 25th rushing O where the Saints led the league for much of the year until PT got hurt (who is fully healthy again).

The Saints can run well and extend drives.

indy4192 · 02-02-2010, 04:55 PM

If Collie is not that wonderful how did he do what he did against the No. 1 ranked D in all of football? How many of your big time WR had 100 catches this season? The Colts have 2 good RB and 1 who can pound it down low (Addai/Brown/Hart) and the TE is a wash? Your kidding right, there is no TE in the game that can do what Clark can do. The Saints didn't play the quality of teams the colts did, thus the rankings are a big misleading.[

QUOTE=Papa Voodoo;202493]I understanding that razzing opposing teams' message boards is well and good, but willy nilly opinions are silly willy.

The Saints, not the Colts have the better offensive unit. Saints have 4 big time recievers to the Colts' 2 1/2 (Collie is not that wonderful). The Saints have 3 RB's to the Colts' 1. Let's call the TE position a wash.

Besides that, the number 1 offense in the NFL this season is New orleans. The Colts aren't even number 2. The Colts have the 25th rushing O where the Saints led the league for much of the year until PT got hurt (who is fully healthy again).

The Saints can run well and extend drives.[/QUOTE]

SAINT_MICHAEL · 02-02-2010, 07:18 PM

Originally Posted by indy4192

There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit,

Really? Well, how about this to make you question it? The Saints and Colts played 6 common opponents this year; the Dolphins, Jets, Cardinals, Rams, Pats, and Bills. We'll take out the Bills as I know you will say you guys didn't try. So between the remaining 5 teams, if you look at average of yards gained and points scored it boils down to this:

Colts 399.5 ypg 30.0 ppg
Saints 415 ypg 33.8 ppg

So, explain to me how there is no question that the Colts have the better offense. I'm not saying the Saints ARE better. I'm just saying that there is no question your statement is stupid.

02-02-2010, 04:20 PM	#1
indy4192 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 122	Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours? They are two different issues. There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit, but that doesn't mean they will win the game, because as the local and national media has said, the Colts are defenseless without Freeney and the Saints will role. Originally Posted by JoanieNTX But the thing is that Indy must be schizo or bi-polar (no offense to those who have the legit problem), because one minute he concedes defeat to the Saints, and the next, he's touting the Dolts offense as the best there is. Make up your mind, Indy!
indy4192 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 122

02-02-2010, 04:27 PM	#2
Papa Voodoo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,634	Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours? Originally Posted by indy4192 They are two different issues. There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit, but that doesn't mean they will win the game, because as the local and national media has said, the Colts are defenseless without Freeney and the Saints will role. I understanding that razzing opposing teams' message boards is well and good, but willy nilly opinions are silly willy. The Saints, not the Colts have the better offensive unit. Saints have 4 big time recievers to the Colts' 2 1/2 (Collie is not that wonderful). The Saints have 3 RB's to the Colts' 1. Let's call the TE position a wash. Besides that, the number 1 offense in the NFL this season is New orleans. The Colts aren't even number 2. The Colts have the 25th rushing O where the Saints led the league for much of the year until PT got hurt (who is fully healthy again). The Saints can run well and extend drives.

02-02-2010, 04:55 PM	#3
indy4192 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 122	Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours? If Collie is not that wonderful how did he do what he did against the No. 1 ranked D in all of football? How many of your big time WR had 100 catches this season? The Colts have 2 good RB and 1 who can pound it down low (Addai/Brown/Hart) and the TE is a wash? Your kidding right, there is no TE in the game that can do what Clark can do. The Saints didn't play the quality of teams the colts did, thus the rankings are a big misleading.[ QUOTE=Papa Voodoo;202493]I understanding that razzing opposing teams' message boards is well and good, but willy nilly opinions are silly willy. The Saints, not the Colts have the better offensive unit. Saints have 4 big time recievers to the Colts' 2 1/2 (Collie is not that wonderful). The Saints have 3 RB's to the Colts' 1. Let's call the TE position a wash. Besides that, the number 1 offense in the NFL this season is New orleans. The Colts aren't even number 2. The Colts have the 25th rushing O where the Saints led the league for much of the year until PT got hurt (who is fully healthy again). The Saints can run well and extend drives.[/QUOTE]
indy4192 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 122

02-02-2010, 07:18 PM	#4
SAINT_MICHAEL 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 446	Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours? Originally Posted by indy4192 There is no question the Colts have the better offensive unit, Really? Well, how about this to make you question it? The Saints and Colts played 6 common opponents this year; the Dolphins, Jets, Cardinals, Rams, Pats, and Bills. We'll take out the Bills as I know you will say you guys didn't try. So between the remaining 5 teams, if you look at average of yards gained and points scored it boils down to this: Colts 399.5 ypg 30.0 ppg Saints 415 ypg 33.8 ppg So, explain to me how there is no question that the Colts have the better offense. I'm not saying the Saints ARE better. I'm just saying that there is no question your statement is stupid.
SAINT_MICHAEL 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 446

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/24624-colts-receivers-better-than-ours.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest Austin Collie News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	02-02-2010 02:54 PM	2