in regards to Bush vs. Sharper, is it possible that if we aren't overpaying for Bush, than paying a competitive price for Sharper is not such an issue?

It's not that complicated and y'all are being too sensitive. We are overpaying for Bush and can't afford the much needed and worth it Sharper.... why is it tragic to compare the two together? I just can't stand reading about salary limits preventing Sharpers return, knowing how much Reggie is robbing the saints for..... don't know how y'all can, but that's you .....sometimes, ignorance is bliss!

If we were talking about salary balance between any other players on the roster vs. Sharper, etc.... no one would be reaching for their shotguns. Why, because it's appropriate. It's what teams do, balance budget vs. volume of quality per player vs. priority, etc. But, because it's Reggie Bush (face of the saints), everyone wants to put on their stubborn caps.

I also think it's hypocritical that everyone's got something to say about Sharper along the lines of "just shut up and take what you can get", and "you're lucky they even want you here".... and at the same time, express no concern for the ridiculous chunk of change Reggie is set make. So everyone cares that Sharper (NFL defensive MVP caliber player) is looking for more money, but could care less what Reggie (high draft disappointment) is making. It just seems backwards, ignorant, hypocritical.... what have you.