C'mon...foolish? They won a SB without him? Not sayin' he's going anywhere...I just don't think it's foolish to think he might be.

i cannot stand that argument....."we won without him"

that doesnt make us a better team..that doesnt make bushrod better

the doesnt mean our offense was better......it definitly doesnt mean the LT position was better

we won a super bowl without all the players we are going to draft and without any player we might bring in through free agency.....so why should we even show up to the draft?

i hate that argument because it doesnt make sense.......so what if we won the super bowl without him.....we are a better team with him

Here's how it makes sense. You're Mickey Loomis, and someone says, "OK...I'll give you the number one pick overall in the draft for JB."