Practice Squad

strato · 09-05-2010, 01:57 PM

No loss with woods...he wasnt the answer...and C.V what a wasted pick..Maybe we bring Clancy back what do you think Danno?

biloxi-indian · 09-05-2010, 02:05 PM

Originally Posted by strato

No loss with woods...he wasnt the answer...and C.V what a wasted pick..Maybe we bring Clancy back what do you think Danno?

In future years draft the Saints should skip the 4th round and accumulate more 7th rounders!

To think the Saints traded up to get Woods. Complete waste!

foreverfan · 09-05-2010, 02:13 PM

Originally Posted by biloxi-indian

In future years draft the Saints should skip the 4th round and accumulate more 7th rounders!

To think the Saints traded up to get Woods. Complete waste!

Yea... get a bunch of 7th rounders and draft LBs.

Danno · 09-05-2010, 02:10 PM

Originally Posted by strato

No loss with woods...he wasnt the answer...and C.V what a wasted pick..Maybe we bring Clancy back what do you think Danno?

My guess is that Gregg Williams probably has a long list of 2-down run cloggers he can call if needed.

The athletic 1-gap penetrators (easy boys, I'm talking football) are probably harder to find, and since we attack versus react he probably desires more 1-gappers like Hargrove.

I think Clancy will be back after his entire salary is no longer guaranteed. And I think Clancy knew that was the plan before he even signed with us.

strato · 09-05-2010, 02:13 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

My guess is that Gregg Williams probably has a long list of 2-down run cloggers he can call if needed.

The athletic 1-gap penetrators (easy boys, I'm talking football) are probably harder to find, and since we attack versus react he probably desires more 1-gappers like Hargrove.

I think Clancy will be back after his entire salary is no longer guaranteed. And I think Clancy knew that was the plan before he even signed with us.

I agree ..DT is the least important pos in G.Ws scheme...but we do need some depth there..and i agree about Clancy....what do you think about us trading for a LB?...

Danno · 09-05-2010, 02:18 PM

Originally Posted by strato

I agree ..DT is the least important pos in G.Ws scheme...but we do need some depth there..and i agree about Clancy....what do you think about us trading for a LB?...

I think if a good trade is offered, we'll jump on it. I also think GW is convinced he can get by with what he has if needed.

We won't reach out of desperation, but we'll damn sure listen to offers.

09-05-2010, 02:05 PM	#2
biloxi-indian Site Donor Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Southlake, TX Posts: 1,706	Originally Posted by strato No loss with woods...he wasnt the answer...and C.V what a wasted pick..Maybe we bring Clancy back what do you think Danno? In future years draft the Saints should skip the 4th round and accumulate more 7th rounders! To think the Saints traded up to get Woods. Complete waste!

09-05-2010, 02:13 PM	#3
foreverfan 12,000 BS Posts Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Metairie, LA Posts: 13,457 Blog Entries: 5	Originally Posted by biloxi-indian In future years draft the Saints should skip the 4th round and accumulate more 7th rounders! To think the Saints traded up to get Woods. Complete waste! Yea... get a bunch of 7th rounders and draft LBs.

09-05-2010, 02:10 PM	#4
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,758	Originally Posted by strato No loss with woods...he wasnt the answer...and C.V what a wasted pick..Maybe we bring Clancy back what do you think Danno? My guess is that Gregg Williams probably has a long list of 2-down run cloggers he can call if needed. The athletic 1-gap penetrators (easy boys, I'm talking football) are probably harder to find, and since we attack versus react he probably desires more 1-gappers like Hargrove. I think Clancy will be back after his entire salary is no longer guaranteed. And I think Clancy knew that was the plan before he even signed with us.

09-05-2010, 02:13 PM	#5
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Originally Posted by Danno My guess is that Gregg Williams probably has a long list of 2-down run cloggers he can call if needed. The athletic 1-gap penetrators (easy boys, I'm talking football) are probably harder to find, and since we attack versus react he probably desires more 1-gappers like Hargrove. I think Clancy will be back after his entire salary is no longer guaranteed. And I think Clancy knew that was the plan before he even signed with us. I agree ..DT is the least important pos in G.Ws scheme...but we do need some depth there..and i agree about Clancy....what do you think about us trading for a LB?...

09-05-2010, 02:18 PM	#6
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,758	Originally Posted by strato I agree ..DT is the least important pos in G.Ws scheme...but we do need some depth there..and i agree about Clancy....what do you think about us trading for a LB?... I think if a good trade is offered, we'll jump on it. I also think GW is convinced he can get by with what he has if needed. We won't reach out of desperation, but we'll damn sure listen to offers.

09-05-2010, 01:57 PM	#1
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	No loss with woods...he wasnt the answer...and C.V what a wasted pick..Maybe we bring Clancy back what do you think Danno?