|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; The players' use of an NFL game with a captive audience to air their salary agenda is a violation of ethics, plain and simple. People shell out bucks to be entertained, not to be manipulated into rubber stamping players' debatable ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
|
The players' use of an NFL game with a captive audience to air their salary agenda is a violation of ethics, plain and simple. People shell out bucks to be entertained, not to be manipulated into rubber stamping players' debatable plea for a more favorable contract. It makes no difference whether the players' cause has merit or not. The fact that they are using an entertainment forum to plead their personal cause is way out of line.
A gentleman posted on this thread previously that he is a teacher. Awesome. If you, sir, were to use your classroom as a forum to air your personal grievances or causes, you should rightly expect to get your south side chewed by your school administrators. Or be fired. And rightfully so. You are being paid to teach, not to appeal for support of your personal causes AT WORK. The same is true for all of us. And the same is true for NFL players. Fans are paying to be entertained by them, not to support their quest for more money. Or whatever they want more of. If players want better contracts, great. They should go seek them on their own time. But they should not use an NFL game that people pay to see as a forum to explicitly forward their cause. I don't care about NFL labor disputes. And I object to way in which NFL players are going about seeking my support in their dispute. It is unethical, it is manipulative, and it pizzes me off. |
Last edited by TopCow; 09-12-2010 at 09:49 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Citizen
|
Originally Posted by TopCow
I think that was the point though top. The players KNOW, that without them, the owners are dead in the water. Like it or not, pay or no pay, they have the upper hand. Players get locked out, owners get scrubs, fans don't watch, players win. That's just the way it is.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
|
Originally Posted by saintpaul25
You may be right for many people, but not for me. If players press this agenda to the point of a lockout, I would drop NFL football altogether. I don't need its addictive rush that badly.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Citizen
|
Ok, if the lock out occurs, it will be the owners that do it, not the players. Basically, if I understand it all correctly, if the players don't agree, to the new bargaining agreement, by a certain date, then the owners will lock them out. Not a strike persay. A forced strike is more like it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|