For the Bag Head Supporters
 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/6739830



Fans can make a difference

By Phil Simms
Special to NFL.com


(Oct. 21, 2003) -- I noticed something somewhat unusual last weekend as I worked the Broncos-Vikings game in Minnesota, and I pointed it out on the air to my broadcast partner, Greg Gumbel. "Wow," I said, "They're all here and the game hasn't even started yet."

I was referring to the fans. And it is unusual these days to see a stadium full of people as the home team is being introduced. You go to the game, enjoy your good food and beverages in the parking lot before the game. But if you're paying all that money for a ticket to the game, you might as well be in your seat when the game starts, right?

I bring this up for a couple of reasons. There is a growing trend in all of sports. It's in the pros, but I've noticed it in college more than ever this year. And I'll even hear it on the occasions I get a chance to catch a high school game: people being immediately dissatisfied with what is going on in the game.

If the home team doesn't get a first down or move the ball in their first drive, you hear a noticeable booing, or at least some dissatisfaction from the fans.

I may be an announcer and a former player, but I am also a fan myself. And I don't understand what it is. It borders on animosity. The prevailing thought is "We can do better," or "You should be doing better." And it really perplexes me.

There's a lot about fan behavior that perplexes me. And I guess another reason I bring it up is the reaction of the Chicago Cubs fans last week when that poor kid reached out for the foul ball in Game 6 of the NLCS. Who can think fast enough when there is a fly ball coming in your direction at a major-league ballpark to think, "Oh no, don't try to catch this, because maybe the leftfielder has a chance at it?" Who thinks that fast? Anybody who says they can is not telling the truth.

But the reaction from everyone else -- the throwing of beer, the cursing, the meanness, even death threats -- are you kidding me? It's so absurd, it's amazing that we're even talking about it.


Randy Moss and the Vikings have the support of their fans.
On the other side of the spectrum is the response from the fans in Minnesota. It was positive all day long. I understand we're talking about an undefeated football team, but there were a couple of moments in the game where lesser fans might have reacted badly. Minnesota went three-and-out a few times and Denver was fighting back, but you never heard more than a few concerned groans. And when crunch time rolled around, when Denver was trying to drive for a tying score, the crowd was such a factor in the game. I know it's a dome, but they still have to make the noise -- and they did it at the right time. What an enjoyable experience for everybody involved.

It's always much easier to enjoy what you're doing than to moan or express hate and displeasure. That takes energy.

Maybe I'm not a good judge. But I love going to sporting events and I can't imagine going to a sporting event and cursing or booing the players. I might be quiet, but I just don't know why you would be vocal against the home team. Why would you want to do that?

Now, I'm sure the Vikings fans weren't as positive when their team was losing games. But you don't go from being the bitter kind of fan I'm talking about to being the fan that is there now. Nobody does that. My take is that Vikings fans probably handled the rough 2002 season much better than most NFL fans around the country would have.

There's no need for me to point out the bad fans, but I have done games where teams have just one loss and they're having a terrific year and the fans are on edge right from the start -- "Come on, satisfy me immediately or I'm going to voice my displeasure." I can hear it and see it right away in those stadiums, and there are plenty of them out there.

Unfortunately, I've noticed it more and more in NFL stadiums, and I notice it much more now in college football, too. Heaven forbid, that kid who is playing for scholarship money doesn't win every week!

The fans accept nothing but perfection. And it's not enough to just win these days -- you have to win with style. It's amazing to me when I read stories about "sloppy victories." I know how hard it is to win, especially in pro football, and any win should be appreciated.

It's just like politics: None of us majored in it and none of us know a whole lot about it, but we have an incredible amount of opinions towards it. The same goes for coaches and players in any sport. "He shouldn't have done this" or "He's not playing well," etc., etc.

I'm guessing that a lot of the fans I'm talking about probably don't read this column. But if you are one of them, just do me this favor: Have a positive outlook, and enjoy the game when you go. Be positive. You will be surprised how that can filter down to the field and help the home team play better. And maybe you can even be a part of winning the game.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

I posted this article for a reason. When things were going bad, there were some fans ( if you want to call them that) that had given up on the season. They even went so far as to wear bags on their heads, when the season still had hope.

Then their were fans and memebers on here that went so far as to say that the players had quit on the coaches. Some fans said that Benson really wasn\'t commited to winning and all he was worried about was making money. It seems like some fans were just looking for any reason to bash the team that they claimed to be fan\'s of. They said they were justified to say anything they wanted because they paid money to watch the Saints and they weren\'t getting their money\'s worth. I could go on and on about what was said, but you all know what was said on here.

I understand that fans want their teams to win, but why do fan\'s want to make statements that they obviously don\'t know ANYTHING about? Why be a fan like that? When things go bad for a while, why do some fans turn on their team? Why not stay postive for as long as you can? It\'s hard for me to understand how someone can bash a team so hard when things are going bad and when things turn around those same fans are back supporting the team like they never said anything at all........

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

OK, here we go. You give the guy an inch, he takes a mile.

A) Benson is more concerned with money than winning. Just b/c we\'ve beaten the two worst teams in the league the last two weeks doesn\'t mean that changed. They could win the damn Super Bowl and I would still believe that Benson is more concerned with money. Just b/c a team is successful in a given period of time does not mean that the owner is more committed to winning than to making money. Just b/c a team is unsuccessful over a given time does not mean an owner is more committed to making money than winning. You have to take the whole picture into account. Benson want money first, and a good team second.

B) \"They said they were justified to say anything they wanted because they paid money to watch the Saints and they weren\'t getting their money\'s worth.\" Damn right. I don\'t care if the Saints are 15-1. If they played like crap in that one I am fully justified to complain about it. I understand the point that you\'re trying to make, but saying that there\'s lots of hope left or expecting sunshine and flowers from the fans when your team if 1-4 in a year that should be a Super Bowl run year is going to get you negative comments. That\'s life Billy. It\'s justified and it\'s realistic.

C) \"I understand that fans want their teams to win, but why do fan\'s want to make statements that they obviously don\'t know ANYTHING about?\" I know when I\'m seeing poor play. I can stress my opinions about why it is occurring and those opinions, unless proven undeniably wrong by a completely unbiased analysis based solely on factual events, are just as valid as any other opinions. Your problem Billy, and this isn\'t a knock I\'m just being honest, is that you seem to believe that you know more than everyone else here, or you believe that your perceptions and opinions are, for some reason, more valid than others\'. They\'re not. Once you understand that, this will all make sense to you. This is the basic premise on which our society functions. In a Democratic state, there is no right or wrong, simply the prevailing opinion at that time.

D) \"When things go bad for a while, why do some fans turn on their team? Why not stay postive for as long as you can?\" History Billy. Those of us, and this very may include you, if it does then I applaud your resolve, have watched year in and year out pretty much always with the same results. If we had an average record of 10-6 over the last ten years with three Super Bowl appearances and 5 or 6 playoff seasons, then you might see a lot of fans saying everything is OK, it will all work out when the team starts out 1-4. Unfortunately, that\'s not the case. 1-4 for the Saints has almost always translated into a losing season, so it\'s natural and realistic to write off the playoffs or even hopes of a winning season. Finally, and this is most important. We\'re emotional Billy. When the team loses we come on this board and vent. It\'s not always rational thought. Perfect for instance was me saying Delhomme was a franchise QB. Can you honestly say that you would expect to hear that from me normally? I mean, I like Jake, I have faith in him, but c\'mon. Do I need to remind you of some of YOUR quotes? The one about being wrong? About how we were the worst team in football? C\'mon man, you know some of these are sarcastic or made out of frustration.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

WhoDat --

I really wasn\'t talking about you. OK -- But only a little bit.

First of all-- Anyone can say anything they want. But the things being said on this board went way beyond the poor play on the field. Some were saying that the players quit on the coaches, when they had NO WAY of knowing this and just the opposite was being said by the players. There were so many conspiracy theories on here that it was ridiculos. Also, keep in mind that some members were stating this as FACT and not opinions. I know they tried their level headed best to convince me of this. But we all seee that wasn\'t the case at all.

As far as Benson as money goes. I can\'t tell you for sure what\'s in the man\'s mind. My only arguement is that winning makes money and losing loses money.

I don\'t think I know everything. What I do know is when folks are talking about something they have absolutely no idea about. FWtex was a prime example. He went into things like he had insider information on and there was no way in hell he could know these things.

As far as some giving up on the season. That\'s fine. But, don\'t be trying to tell me I\'m a damn fool for not giving up. Which is exactly what some were telling me to do. It\'s just when they jump back on the band wagon, I\'m going to remind them when they told me I was a \"Dam Fool.\"

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Sorry, but I have to call BS on this one.

Simms\'s article is condescending. Prices for tickets to college and pro games increase every year, not to mention merchandise, concessions, parking. I\'m sure many of you on the board know how much it costs to take a family of four to the Dome for a game. Ridiculous? Maybe, but if you\'re a fan you don\'t mind, because it\'s entertainment. It\'s an escape.

I completely agree with his points about violent, drunken and beligerent fans, but I take exception to his tone and general attitude toward fans who want success and gratification at the games. We (the fans) pay for a product. If the product is not good, we have a right to voice our opinions. For example, If George goes to a Justin Timberlake concert, and Justin can\'t hit those high notes, George has the right to boo. In that same vein, if I go to a Saints game at the Dome, and the team doesn\'t show up and gets schlacked in a fifty-something to twenty-something blowout, I have the right to boo, wear a bag, call them the \"the Aints\", whatever.

Fans are not responsible for the hype surrounding pro and college teams. The teams are responsible. They build themselves up so that we will buy tickets. That\'s good business. The other side to that, however, is that the team has to be prepared to deal with disgruntled fans if the product does not meet expectations.

Ridiculous, Phil. I don\'t have to have a poly-sci major to vote, but my vote is a necessary component of the political system. I don\'t have to have ever touched a football, but without my ticket money and the ticket money of those like me, football would not be the multi-billion dollar business that it is.

Billy, yes, people were talking about the team quitting on the coaches, the owner not caring about winning, etc. I would think those comments would be the very least you\'d expect after the start this team had. I hope that we\'ve turned it around, but I don\'t understand why you criticize those who reacted negatively toward the Saints organization after a 1-4 start, especially given the hype we heard from the team during the offseason.

Think of it this way, at least people were coming to the boards, even if it was to complain. The alternative is that they don\'t come to the boards, which means that they don\'t care anymore.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

whowatches --

Of course fans are going to upset when their team starts out 1-4. But, to go making statements saying the players have given up was just making things up. There was no evidence that the players had given up !! NONE !! And now we see that wasn\'t the case at all. So, if y\'all get upset with the players, then I get upset with the fans that go around making stuff up about a team that I love. Stick to what you know or at least have SOME kind of evidence to support that theory with. Can you or ANYONE ELSE show me some evidence where the players quit?

Now, if someone is just an emotinal fan and want\'s to come in here and vent, then state that at the beginning of the post, because I have no way to know that. I\'m just sitting here reading this STUFF and I\'m taking it like they mean what they are saying.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

No, you cannot show undeniable evidence that those players had quit. You\'re right about that Billy. But you can almost NEVER show undeniable evidence of ANYTHING in sports.

What you can do, is come to an educated conclusion based on observed phenominom. For example, after week five the Saints had managed to go just 2-10 in their last twelve (including preseason) under Haslett. The offense, defense, and special teams were all sputtering. Players were throwing fits on the sidelines, and making obviously disgruntled comments in the media. Haslett kept babbling about not knowing what the problem was. Former players and managers were coming out and talking about how the organization is Mickey Mouse. Based on ALL of that information, and their PLAY ON THE FIELD, which was obviously uninspired, it is not unreasonable to believe that the players had quit on the team, or that hope was essentially lost for this season.

[Edited on 22/10/2003 by WhoDat]

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

You know, wearing a bag at games (is that what all this is about?) is tasteless and tacky. I\'m sure it bothers players because MOST of the players are working hard and trying to succeed. Sure, they\'re paid VERY well, but they risk a lot every week to play NFL football. If I were a player I\'d be offended.

However, and it\'s a big however, if I pay a hundred bucks for tickets and 20 bucks to park and get screwed minus the kiss for hot dogs and beer and such I\'ll wear a bag if I damn well please. Joe Horn can bite me!

Please understand that I\'m not the kind of guy who would do that. I only show up to support the team. I don\'t pay that kinda money to show up and ridicule the players, however, for that kinda money, if the team generally Sucks like, say, Arizona, I can\'t very well fault a guy for that. There are worse things he/she could be doing.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Good post, good post...

but what does this mean? \"...but they risk a lot every week to play NFL football.\"

What does an NFL player risk that Johnny Construction Worker does not? And does the guy hanging off of the steel beam a thousand feet up in the air get paid a million dollars for his work? What about the ER nurse who risks infection or injury with every patient she sees and has to take home images of mangled children or people dying every single day?

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

WhoDat --

You say that the folks talking about the players quitting was based off of an educated guess? What\'s educated about it? I watched the games and I saw no evidence of that? Did you? I read what the players were saying and they said just the opposite !! I\'m sure someone can come up with SOME reason for making a statement like that but it was hardly EDUCATED !! I could say McCarthy was quitting on the players by calling terrible plays and make an arguement, but how educated would that be? My point is that just because a team is losing that fan\'s don\'t have to make things up and that\'s EXACTLY what they were doing.

As far as the bag heads. They need to keep wearing \'em. It seems to have worked. Don\'t you agree??

[Edited on 22/10/2003 by BillyCarpenter1]

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

I only mean they\'re paid well in a tough occupation Whodat. I\'m not cuttin\' any slack and I agree with you 100 % about Johnny Construction Worker etc. I guess what I mean is that people throw the money thing around because the players are paid well. What I\'m trying to say is that, while the money is there for the players, MOST of \'em are trying VERY hard to do a good job. If I were a player makin the minimum or top 5 salary I\'d be one of the guys bustin\' my butt on every down, and the bag heads would piss me off. I also understand the fan who bought season tickets. That\'s a major investment, so I can see why some would display their displeasure that way. I still think it\'s tacky, and tasteless and disrespectful tho.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Saintfan - agreed.

Billy - do you read these posts? C\'mon hombre. Reread this:

\"For example, after week five the Saints had managed to go just 2-10 in their last twelve (including preseason) under Haslett. (REASON 1) The offense, defense, and special teams were all sputtering. (REASONS 2-4) Players were throwing fits on the sidelines, and making obviously disgruntled comments in the media. (REASON 5 & 6) Haslett kept babbling about not knowing what the problem was. (REASON 7) Former players and managers were coming out and talking about how the organization is Mickey Mouse. (REASON 8) Based on ALL of that information, and their PLAY ON THE FIELD, which was obviously uninspired (BIGGEST REASON), it is not unreasonable to believe that the players had quit on the team, or that hope was essentially lost for this season. \"

I just listed about 10 reasons why a person could come to the conclusion that the team was quitting on Haslett. I was one of them. Those are good reasons, and that belief is EDUCATED based on those events which I personally witnesseds.

\"What\'s educated about it? I watched the games and I saw no evidence of that? Did you?\" Yes, I did. See above.

\"I read what the players were saying and they said just the opposite!!\" No Sh!t huh? You mean the player didn\'t come out and say - \"Yeah, we quit on Jim. We\'re done. Season\'s over - pack it up guys b/c we certainly have.\" Is that what you expected? That\'s pretty ridiculous. Come one Billy. The team has won two in a row, so now you\'re talking about how ridiculous it is that everyone was saying that this team had quit. In a month, if they\'re 3-8, all these comments that you\'re making right now are going to look pretty naive, wouldn\'t you say? Those comments were all well founded and made for good reasons based on observed events. Just b/c you disagree with them now doesn\'t mean that they were unfounded then. Again, do you want me to show you comments you made during that time period?

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Yeah Yeah -- I hear ya. But I ain\'t buying any of it !!

With your theory then losing makes saying ANYTHING ok. It was pretty obvious to me that while the play on the field was poor that no one was giving up or quitting. Which players did you see quit WhoDat? Back some of this stuff up? All you\'re doing is trying to come up with some kind of reason to justify making these statements. The National Enquirer could come up with some reasons to why their storys are justified, but I\'ll stick to reading a more credible source !!

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Need proof? How about that 55-21 ass whipping we took. There is nothing you can tell me that would convince me that the Colts are that much better than the Saints. And with a score like that, it reeks of a defeated and put-out team.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Couldn\'t resist huh? How about we had 6 starters out on defense? How about blowouts happen, even to the best of teams. Did you happen to watch what the Colts did to the super bowl champion Bucs? I\'ll ask you the same question. Which player(s) did you see quit?

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

You really don\'t want me to play this game with you, Billy, you really don\'t. It\'s not like any of the players went on national TV and said, \"Yeah, I quit in the game.\" Too bad in your mind that\'s the only thing that would shut you up. Yeah, blowouts happen in the NFL, and it happens to teams that have given up on that particular game. Yeah, we had half our defense out- so what? Will that be an excuse for Tampa this weekend if they get blown out by the Cowboys? In case you haven\'t noticed, thier defense is pretty banged up too. Not only did they lose Kelly for the season, Lynch, Sapp, and Rice are all banged up as well. Let\'s take a look at some of the more injured teams this year
Philadelphia
Probable
G Jermane Mayberry (elbow); QB Donovan McNabb (leg/thumb); RB Jon Ritchie (hamstring); CB Lito Sheppard (toe); DT Corey Simon (foot/back); CB Troy Vincent (hamstring); G John Welbourn (leg); DE Brandon Whiting (hamstring)
Questionable WR Todd Pinkston (knee); CB Bobby Taylor (foot); RB Brian Westbrook (hip)
Doubtful
DE Jerome McDougle (ankle)
Out
S Brian Dawkins (foot); CB Roderick Hood (hamstring)

Worst loss so far was to New England, 31-10, and the Pats are leading the AFC North. On top of that, every other game they\'ve played was close, except for this one.

Oakland
Probable
S Derrick Gibson (shoulder); LB Eric Johnson (chest)
Questionable
G Mo Collins (knee); S Anthony Dorsett (elbow); RB Ronney Jenkins (ankle); T Lincoln Kennedy (calf); TE O.J. Santiago (hamstring); C Matt Stinchcomb (shoulder); DT Dana Stubblefield (ankle); DE Sam Williams (knee); S Rod Woodson (knee)
Doubtful
G Frank Middleton (quadricep); DT John Parrella (groin); WR Jerry Porter (abdomen); LB Bill Romanowski (concussion)

Worst loss so far was 31-10 against the Broncos, who are 5-2 at the moment. The rest of thier games, they lost by a touchdown or less.

But you\'ll probably ignore all this information, and continue to ask \"who did you see give up?\" If it was that evident during the game, you can be damn sure that I would not have been the only one to see it, and the player in question would have already been lambasted by the media. Plus, I know how easy it is to fall into the temptation of giving up. It is something that hangs on you constantly. Whether or not you give in, describes the type of player you are.

Is that what you would describe as a team that quit? I don\'t think that the Buccs quit in that game, I think the Colts caught them believing their own hype.










[Edited on 22/10/2003 by BlackandBlue]

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Yeah, I really do. If you are trying to tell me that when a team get\'s blown out that the reason for that is the players quit, then you\'ll have a better chance to get me to like \"George.\" You can talk about other teams but that\'s not relevant to the Saints. I know you put a lot of effort in looking up that information, but so what !!

Did Carolina quit against the Titans? I think not. I think things happen sometimes and blowouts happen. It sure seems that the Saints came together as a team here lately. Now, does that sound like a team that has given up? NO !! It sounds like a team that got humilated by the Colts and they had the resolve to get better. But, if you want to think that they gave up against the Colts. Then, this is America. Believe what you want to..

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

I\'m not the one that brought up other teams to begin with- you did! Did I say they gave up on the year, no, they\'ve proven that they haven\'t already. But they did give up in the Colts game. In my opinion, good teams do not get blown out. So, we either have a bad team on our hands, which I don\'t believe, or they gave up in the Colts game. I\'m believe that more than I do a bad team.
Since you really want to play this game, fine, let\'s play. I don\'t think Aaron Brooks is smart enough to be a starting NFL QB. I\'m going to need more proof than, \"Yes he is.\" What proof do you have that he is???

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Oh, really now. Well, would you say that teams that make it to the Super Bowl are good teams? Yes?? I guess all those team that got blown out in the Super Bowl quit too huh??

Soon as you explain this to me we can continue our debate !!

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

It should be noted that we\'ve had the toughest schedule in the league thus far base on our opponents records. ...for what it\'s worth...

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Yes, I also noted that. And we have one of the easiest for the remainder of the season.
I didn\'t want to post it though because the same thing happened last year and we got cocky and lost 5 of our last 8.

But I\'m secretly over-optimistic. ;)

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Gator --

I don\'t PAD or PAT myself on the back. I also I\'m not going around saying I was right about anything. Am I doing something to piss you off Gator? If I am -- Get over big boy !!

If you choose to wear a bag -- I\'ll tell you who I am to question it. I\'m the one who\'ll be calling you an idiot the second you slap it on? Ya dig Gator?

[Edited on 22/10/2003 by BillyCarpenter1]

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

LOL. Gator, if only I could be so eloquent! I love reading your posts man.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Don\'t be encourging him now. This could get messy!!

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

I was gonna call you gay but you said your azzhole stinks !! That would make you a stinking azz gay boy....

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Uuuummmmm, um, um, um... I\'m telling Joe on you two! ;)

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Sounds like George...

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

OK, I\'m going to have to call a penalty on this one.

Gator, you\'re mi amigo, but how in the hell can you call some one stupid and use incorrect grammar in the same sentence? Your = a possession of yours. Something you own. You\'re means you are. As in YOU\'RE too stupid...

c\'mon. You\'ve gotta have a time out for that comment.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

You\'re making your point well.
There is a reason their grammer sux, they\'re just careless

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Glad you caught that too, Tweaky. I guess we\'re the only two. I hate to have to go around correcting people, but dang! ;)

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

That\'s who\'sthe moron. Idiot.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

You get the same respect from me that you give Gator. You don\'t hurt my feelings. I\'m sitting right here feeling just the same as I did before we had this conversation.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Now I\'M offended!!!! :mad:

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Actually, I thought about you when I wrote that BnB, but I needed to use the number 2 in order to fit in with the whole theme of the post. You\'re definitely included TOO.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Are we having fun yet? Where in the hell did all this come from? Here I am sitting here trying to get over a small heart attack and I come on line to this? Holy Chit Rosco, We could be talking about the problems of the world or who killed J.R. on friggin Dallas, but NOOOOOOOOOOOO, instead we have 2 (count em folks) 2 members verbally abusing each other. At least this time it does seem to me that most of the other members are enjoying it. I cannot say, however , what the readers that don\'t post on here think. I will bet this though. I bet the 2 of you can get this out of your system soon Right? So get over it! Move on to some other moronic subject like? OH I GOT IT! It\'ll soon be Christmas, ya\'ll can talk about Mr. Hankey the Christmas Poo!

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Sorry about the stress there Joe -- I post an article by Phil Simms and it sets off all of this. Who knew?

I have learned 2 things from this experience though.

1. Folks don\'t like when you question how they react towards they Saints.

2. No one is ever wrong on here. Can I take back everytime I amitted I was wrong, because obviously I was wrong when I said I was wrong. See........I knew I was never wrong. WhoDat brought this to my attention.

[Edited on 22/10/2003 by BillyCarpenter1]

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

It\'s not that you\'re wrong Billy, it\'s that you continue to tell everyone else that they\'re wrong. People have opinions and all of them are like azzholes, everybody has one and they all generally stink. I guess what i\'m trying to get across to you is that quit telling everyone else that they\'re wrong, they have as much right to their opinion as you do. Quit taking every complaint about AB and the Saints in general personally, it ain\'t about you. It\'s a team thing. Life and death doesn\'t hinge on whether the Saints win or loose, but it sure makes it more fun when they win.

For some of us this team is like our kids. We want the best for them,we know what they have in them,we know what they are capable of. When they don\'t produce it hurts us like it would any parent. We expect the most and best out of our kids everyday, to us that have been around for all these years,we want to see them go get it all! When they don\'t produce it hurts us. Plain and simple.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

I\'ll take that into consideration Joe. But, I think if the Saints are like their kids, that they are abusing their child. Therefore, I reserve the right to smack them around a few times... :o

Besides, if not for me, who is everyone gonna kick around???

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

No, I said you cannot be wrong without perponderence of evidence. For example, if you said that Albert Connell would be the next Joe Horn, you were wrong. What I\'m saying is that you cannot be wrong in an opinion if there is not enough evidence to clearly sway the decision one way or another.

For the Bag Head Supporters
 

Ok Billy, I\'ve never been one to give up on anything in my life but I give up on you. You have never been wrong since you\'ve come to this board and from the looks of things you never will be wrong. You turn everything around so it meets your requirements. No one else is allowed an opinion except you. Here\'s what I\'m going to do with you. I will not answer any more of your posts that don\'t have merit to them, I will be the one to judge the merit. Keep treating members the way you do and you will have a miserable time on here. These folks, though I might not always agree with them, I always respect them, I hope they respect me. Not to sure you do but that\'s different. As long as you keep it clean you won\'t have a problem with me or from me. However, do as you have been known to do and you know what I will have to do.